It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So there are millions of pages of data available and all you need to do is google it.start anywhere there is so much data that you couldnt miss if you tried,just type in your question and start browseing.In fact its impossible to not get relevant data,first google then youtube and its humanly impossible to miss loads of relevant data.
da·ta noun pl but singular or pl in constr, often attributive \ˈdā-tə, ˈda- also ˈdä-\
Definition of DATA
1
: factual information (as measurements or statistics) used as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or calculation
2
: information output by a sensing device or organ that includes both useful and irrelevant or redundant information and must be processed to be meaningful
3
: information in numerical form that can be digitally transmitted or processed
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by one4all
So there are millions of pages of data available and all you need to do is google it.start anywhere there is so much data that you couldnt miss if you tried,just type in your question and start browseing.In fact its impossible to not get relevant data,first google then youtube and its humanly impossible to miss loads of relevant data.
You seem to be confusing wild, baseless claims with data. Here, let me help:
da·ta noun pl but singular or pl in constr, often attributive \ˈdā-tə, ˈda- also ˈdä-\
Definition of DATA
1
: factual information (as measurements or statistics) used as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or calculation
2
: information output by a sensing device or organ that includes both useful and irrelevant or redundant information and must be processed to be meaningful
3
: information in numerical form that can be digitally transmitted or processed
www.merriam-webster.com...
Originally posted by DJW001
Yes, I am familiar with Svensmark's work and find it intriguing. It might be the most important insight into long term climate change since Milankovich. It has yet to be proven, however.
Originally posted by one4all
reply to post by DJW001
When you watch scientists and archeologists and other professionals talking about past pole shifts and their effects on the planet,it becomes data,when you hear military personell and NASA insiders saying similar things their words become data,you cannot muffle another persons voice because your own personal level of proof isnt met,you can define yourself more and more of a contrarian as the data mounts but surely you wont choose to remain in a self-inflicted state of denial of the mounting data that runs counter to one perspective and is supportive of another.
we must define reality before we can begin to delineate what is fact and then if that fact is strong enough to change our individual perspective then we will make that free will choice,but by not aknowledgeing other human beings personal testimony and demanding fact beyond anothers truth we are creating a self-imposed state of ignorance of reality,now I am not disputeing or debateing facts here,i am saying you arent even ready to delineate reality yet so how can you hope to use facts to define your own personal perspective??You cannot rely on the written word more than the spoken word,a humans voice in front of you must carry more weight than any written word,and as soon as you choose to play word games you create a self-imposed state of stsis,where you refuse to learn anything beyond that which you can verify through the writeen word,which coincidentlly is the easiest way to misrepresent,manipulate,and lie to another human being.So you need to rethink your approach to defining you REALITY before you go searching for facts.Your reality is defined by the actions of other humans around you .not your individual utopian view of the world that you construct through suppression of your fellow mans word and truth.
.
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
Meanwhile, I will continue to promote the idea that climate change is affected by changes in the Earth's magnetic field. I have connected the two subjects in this thread, and I'm running with it.
No, you haven't. You have spammed a series of unrelated references about geo-magnetic migration without actually establishing a case for them to be related to climatic changes. Only one of your sources supports this premise, and you still haven't explained it in your own words. In the meantime, you've been acting like a peevish child, insisting I look up the exact number of climate scientists who believe that the recent severe weather has been caused by global warming. If you cannot find data that supports your contention and piece together a reasonable argument, don't take it out on me.
When we post without sources and/or citations in support of our threads, we are scolded. When we post sources and/or citations in support of our threads we are "spamming".
O.K.