It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
Many have noticed the recent increase in extreme weather:
And the overwhelming majority of meteorologists and climatologists attribute it to global warming, not geo-magnetic field changes.edit on 16-5-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Svensmark's Theory Explained
A team of more than 60 scientists from around the world are preparing to conduct a large-scale experiment using a particle accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland, to replicate the effect of cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
They hope this will prove whether this deep space radiation is responsible for changing cloud cover. If so, it could force climate scientists to re-evaluate their ideas about how global warming occurs.
www.viewzone.com...
Meanwhile, I will continue to promote the idea that climate change is affected by changes in the Earth's magnetic field. I have connected the two subjects in this thread, and I'm running with it.
A team of more than 60 scientists from around the world are preparing to conduct a large-scale experiment using a particle accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland, to replicate the effect of cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
They hope this will prove whether this deep space radiation is responsible for changing cloud cover. If so, it could force climate scientists to re-evaluate their ideas about how global warming occurs.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
A team of more than 60 scientists from around the world are preparing to conduct a large-scale experiment using a particle accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland, to replicate the effect of cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
They hope this will prove whether this deep space radiation is responsible for changing cloud cover. If so, it could force climate scientists to re-evaluate their ideas about how global warming occurs.
And if the results are negative, will you accept them?
Edit to add: Incidentally, who is regurgitating now?edit on 16-5-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
Meanwhile, I will continue to promote the idea that climate change is affected by changes in the Earth's magnetic field. I have connected the two subjects in this thread, and I'm running with it.
No, you haven't. You have spammed a series of unrelated references about geo-magnetic migration without actually establishing a case for them to be related to climatic changes. Only one of your sources supports this premise, and you still haven't explained it in your own words. In the meantime, you've been acting like a peevish child, insisting I look up the exact number of climate scientists who believe that the recent severe weather has been caused by global warming. If you cannot find data that supports your contention and piece together a reasonable argument, don't take it out on me.
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Latitude Longitude year
80.815 -109.568 2001
81.268 -110.89 2002
81.714 -112.344 2003
82.193 -114.095 2004
82.623 -115.892 2005
83.127 -118.178 2006
83.579 -120.578 2007
83.981 -123.067 2008
84.37 -125.881 2009
84.742 -129.077 2010
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by hp1229
Words of wisdom. Thank you for your reply.
Originally posted by alfa1So good news then.
The magnetic pole is heading towards the rotational pole.
Things are going towards a "normal" situation.
If the results are positive, will you accept them?
Originally posted by grey580
Why does this
Remind me of this?
Talk about eerie coincidence.