It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The existence of an object anything like Nibiru (which, as Sitchin would have us believe, periodically enters the inner Solar System) is a physical impossibility. It would disrupt the orbits of the planets hopelessly.
Is there proof that 1 billion years ago nothing rogue came through the inner solar system? I don't think so.
Originally posted by lightmeup04
reply to post by eriktheawful
We know the orbital mechanics for how long?? And our solar system is how old?? I don't think we know a whole lot.
Lightmeup04
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
If a rogue planet entering the solar system would disrupt planetary orbits "hopelessly", potentially causing chaos within the solar system
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
wouldn't a rogue planet theory easily explain the odd orbit of mars
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
and the existence of the asteroid belt....which could be the remains of a 5th planet in the solar system but destroyed by the rogue planet?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
The name eludes me, but there is a theory/equation used by planatery scientists to calculate how many planets a star should have, and using that equation means that our solar system should have a planet exactly where the belt is.
There is nothing odd about the orbit of Mars.
The asteroid belt is not the remnants of a destroyed planet. There is not enough mass in all of the asteroid belt to form our Moon.
I think you are talking the "Titius-Bode Law
Couldn't a large rogue planet impact a smaller planet, leaving behind some remnants of the impact, and "pull" the rest with it out into space? One theory suggests that this would be the real explanation of the existence of comets.
Planetesimals within the region which would become the asteroid belt were too strongly perturbed by Jupiter's gravity to form a planet. Instead they continued to orbit the Sun as before, while occasionally colliding.[26] In regions where the average velocity of the collisions was too high, the shattering of planetesimals tended to dominate over accretion,[27] preventing the formation of planet-sized bodies. Orbital resonances occurred where the orbital period of an object in the belt formed an integer fraction of the orbital period of Jupiter, perturbing the object into a different orbit; the region lying between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter contains many such orbital resonances. As Jupiter migrated inward following its formation, these resonances would have swept across the asteroid belt, dynamically exciting the region's population and increasing their velocities relative to each other.[28]
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103512001182
Icarus
Available online 3 April 2012
In Press, Corrected Proof
Explaining why the uranian satellites have equatorial prograde orbits despite the large planetary obliquity
* A. Morbidelli a,
* K. Tsiganis b,
* K. Batygin c,
* A. Crida a,
* R. Gomes d,
* a Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Boulevard de l’Observatoire, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France
* b Department of Physics, Section Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
* c California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, MC 170-25 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, United States
* d Observatório Nacional José Cristino, Rua General José Cristino 77, CEP 20921-400 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
* Received 16 November 2011. Revised 23 March 2012. Accepted 27 March 2012. Available online 3 April 2012.
Abstract
We show that the existence of prograde equatorial satellites is consistent with a collisional tilting scenario for Uranus. In fact, if the planet was surrounded by a proto-satellite disk at the time of the tilting and a massive ring of material was temporarily placed inside the Roche radius of the planet by the collision, the proto-satellite disk would have started to precess incoherently around the equator of the planet, up to a distance greater than that of Oberon. Collisional damping would then have collapsed it into a thin equatorial disk, from which the satellites eventually formed. The fact that the orbits of the satellites are prograde requires Uranus to have had a non-negligible initial obliquity (comparable to that of Neptune) before it was finally tilted to 98°.
Keywords
* Uranus;
* Uranus, Satellites;
* Satellites, Formation;
* Satellites, Dynamics
Would you call this law "industry standard" for all other solar systems though?
Originally posted by Avalessa
Nibiru does not exist. I'm sorry to say, but it doesn't. Other planets exist, but Nibiru doesn't. There is no such thing as a winged planet hat will save humans from disaster. You can't steer a planet.
Sitchin published a book, The End of Days, which set the time for the last passing of Nibiru by Earth at 556 BC, which would mean, given the object's supposed 3,600-year orbit, that it would return sometime around AD 2900.[17]
My question is can it travel at the exact same speed as Neptune all the time?
Originally posted by Avalessa
Nibiru does not exist. I'm sorry to say, but it doesn't. Other planets exist, but Nibiru doesn't. There is no such thing as a winged planet hat will save humans from disaster. You can't steer a planet.