It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...it is now impossible for America to keep the title of world superpower...
Originally posted by CrimsonKapital
You read the title correctly, I'm so sick of hearing people from the West stating that the decline and fall of America/Europe has been engineered by pro-globalist agents in order to usher in a one world order.
Well let me give you a sad reality check, no it isn't whilst your countries might be going downhill it doesn't mean the world is ending, the East is a rising power and those institutions which once operated in the West are now moving to the East.
You all seem to think the collapse of the West would destroy the world, and that ALL nations including China would collapse. What a load of bulls**t.
The West had its time as the dominant world power and now it is struggling to come to terms that its reign is over, so as it struggles it is making up excuses such as "its been engineered by the nwo".
The East is rising..
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
...it is now impossible for America to keep the title of world superpower...
Mistaken...as long as America maintains the world's largest stockpile of strategic nuclear weapons it will remain a superpower. You really don't think America is willing and/or ready to give up this title, right?
i believe you're talking about the government.....i'm referring to people.........you know innocent people. we (the american people) didn't do any of those things.
Originally posted by TheMatrixusesYou
What??!!
You're all wrong. The West didn't just lose the power as in we dropped the ball. The power was wrestled from our hands in an underhanded, behind the scenes set of strategic moves that are still taking place as we speak.
The central government should never have gotten as much power as it has now. If our population was vigilant, this wouldn't have happened. Unfortunately the British and others have steadily been working behind the scenes paying off our elected officials while we slept and now this is the outcome.
The rise of the east is just part of the plan, you dilts. Elements of our federal government raising taxes and making it illegal to make certain items in America have caused the movement of millions of jobs to move abroad.
Unions have been a big factor involved in causing prices and wages to rise too high for the sustainability of businesses. That of course is the progressive left which has its roots in Europe.
Do some critical thinking every once in a while cuz your lack of which is making me hurt!
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
It took more than my lifetime for it to rebound. It will take much of my childrens lifetime to rebound. Maybe my grandchildren will see it good again.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
Originally posted by TheMatrixusesYou
What??!!
You're all wrong. The West didn't just lose the power as in we dropped the ball. The power was wrestled from our hands in an underhanded, behind the scenes set of strategic moves that are still taking place as we speak.
The central government should never have gotten as much power as it has now. If our population was vigilant, this wouldn't have happened. Unfortunately the British and others have steadily been working behind the scenes paying off our elected officials while we slept and now this is the outcome.
The rise of the east is just part of the plan, you dilts. Elements of our federal government raising taxes and making it illegal to make certain items in America have caused the movement of millions of jobs to move abroad.
Unions have been a big factor involved in causing prices and wages to rise too high for the sustainability of businesses. That of course is the progressive left which has its roots in Europe.
Do some critical thinking every once in a while cuz your lack of which is making me hurt!
Great post.
No one knows what the hell is going on, anymore.
To paraphrase Jon Stewart on The Daily Show, last night...
Oh, the irony... Germany was defeated, emphatically, in WWII - now, 70 years later, they have no army, yet control ALL of Europe.
Originally posted by Torbu
reply to post by TheMatrixusesYou
It can also be argued that a non-selfish behaviour is also a selfish behaviour so that communism or socialism actually could work precisely because of selfishness as the capitalism does. The only difference is that socialism is more evolved than capitalism and communism more evolved than socialism. After all capitalism is quite close to the law of jungle, isn't it?
About Jesus and the teaching you may as well say that after all you do what is written in the bible from self interest as you want to end up in heaven not in hell... But there, I think, the real or at least official lesson, is that you should not be selfish.
And in order to stay on topic, I think it's not quite hard to understand that having more ppl focused on the same task is better than having fewer ppl staying focused on that same task and competing among them. Sure there is a balance somewhere on the amount of ppl that are usefull for a given task and over that team size the synergy stops working, but if you can, and with the new technologies you can, coordinate ppl nicely, the results can be quite amazing... take whatever open source project as an example.
Originally posted by Torbu
reply to post by TheMatrixusesYou
It can also be argued that a non-selfish behaviour is also a selfish behaviour so that communism or socialism actually could work precisely because of selfishness as the capitalism does. The only difference is that socialism is more evolved than capitalism and communism more evolved than socialism. After all capitalism is quite close to the law of jungle, isn't it?
About Jesus and the teaching you may as well say that after all you do what is written in the bible from self interest as you want to end up in heaven not in hell... But there, I think, the real or at least official lesson, is that you should not be selfish.
And in order to stay on topic, I think it's not quite hard to understand that having more ppl focused on the same task is better than having fewer ppl staying focused on that same task and competing among them. Sure there is a balance somewhere on the amount of ppl that are usefull for a given task and over that team size the synergy stops working, but if you can, and with the new technologies you can, coordinate ppl nicely, the results can be quite amazing... take whatever open source project as an example.
So if you are going to compare capitalism with communism from a productive point of view I think capitalism is always going to lose. Not that in capitalism people work less, they actually might be working more overall but there is too many people with a selfish will to success for themselves. And being honest... if success means I have a bigger house than you do, we can't both succeed.
It can also be argued that a non-selfish behaviour is also a selfish behaviour so that communism or socialism actually could work precisely because of selfishness as the capitalism does. The only difference is that socialism is more evolved than capitalism and communism more evolved than socialism. After all capitalism is quite close to the law of jungle, isn't it?
Originally posted by freakjive
Take it...you can have all the power you want. I as a westerner and an American am simply tired of dealing with the responsibilities that come with being the world's dominant power.
I never wanted it to begin with. I was just dealt this hand. I'll do what I can to change it.
Good luck!
So one state out of 50 in the USA is capable of turning Australia into a parking lot. I know Australia was started as a penal colony, so I know the genetics for trolling, psychopathy and delusion run high there and could explain why the majority of Academic wackjobs are from Australia, the land of inbred criminals.