Banks Cooperating With Each Other and Police to Track Occupy Protesters

reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux


Well.. I shouldn't have said here. I mostly meant on my facebook so others in my town can recognize him.

Although I wouldn't see any problem with posting them here, there should be consequences to those kinds of actions.

Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by RSF77

 

Sure, my resistance to your tyranny is nonsense. This has nothing to do with this internet forum and everything to do with the words you are on record for - words by the way I and others, see Sonny's post above, will zealously defend you have the write to post - which reveal you have absolutely no regard for the unalienable rights of all. Do you need me to dumb that down for you? You only care about your own rights and the rights of those you chose to care about, and could care less about any other persons rights.

Honestly, I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I think you might be a shill.

You keep making all these broad assumptions about me and stuff, if you are a real person then you got some problems.

reply to post by thehoneycomb


I don't see any problem with any of those?

Kids demonstrating free speech, a kid sleeping, a clever sign about corporations undermining the constitution (i don't think you understood that one). Just because some socialists come out doesn't mean it represents the majority of these protests. I stated in my post that there is a difference between the original ones that were trying to be co-opted in bigger cities and the REAL protests that spread like wildfire throughout America. Also that's not a lot of "negative" (implying any of it is REALLY negative) for months and months and probably hundred/s of thousands of protesters/supporters. I am saying that what I posted is a legit view of what the occupy camps/protests looked like 99 percent of the time. Not when a couple kids trying to throw their voice about socialism in the mix (No one was having that, and when an Obama supporter tried to co-opt the Occupy I went to he was shut out, allowed to stay, but not included in decision making anymore). However the police acted like animals pretty consistently throughout the whole time, and politicians acted like fools, having police destroy the camps only to let the protestors back in. It exposed a lot of problems in this country.

The only problem Occupy has is people like you wanting it to be something it isn't so you can justify not standing up for anything and bad mouthing those who do.

reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux

Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by RSF77

 

Sure, my resistance to your tyranny is nonsense. This has nothing to do with this internet forum and everything to do with the words you are on record for - words by the way I and others, see Sonny's post above, will zealously defend you have the write to post - which reveal you have absolutely no regard for the unalienable rights of all. Do you need me to dumb that down for you? You only care about your own rights and the rights of those you chose to care about, and could care less about any other persons rights.

Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.

reply to post by sonnny1


Tell me how and I'll pass it along

reply to post by RSF77

Honestly, I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I think you might be a shill.

You keep making all these broad assumptions about me and stuff, if you are a real person then you got some problems.

\

I have made no "assumptions" about you and am responding directly to your own words, of which now you backpedal and hope to somehow escape by calling me a shill. I am shill for unalienable rights for all people. Just who the hell are you a shilling for?

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Please. Actions speak louder than words.

Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by sonnny1

 

Right, and so does my voice. That quote was my voice.

But it doesn't make it right,just like it doesn't make an Anarchist right,in destroying property.Either the REAL law,catches these guys,or OWS reigns them in,or the worst possible outcome,a business owner taking out his aggression, out on one of these people. Regardless,I see it as an ominous sign,that this will probably spiral out of control,if not checked soon.

Personally,I would think you could understand that the rules/laws/rights apply to everyone,even the Anarchist, that doesn't want to abide by those rules.


I think OWS is and always was a co-oped agenda driven movement. There is too much evidence,supporting that theory.

Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by RSF77

 

Honestly, I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I think you might be a shill.

You keep making all these broad assumptions about me and stuff, if you are a real person then you got some problems.

\

I have made no "assumptions" about you and am responding directly to your own words, of which now you backpedal and hope to somehow escape by calling me a shill. I am shill for unalienable rights for all people. Just who the hell are you a shilling for?

Then what the hell are you talking about my "tyranny" and #?

Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by RSF77

 

Sure, my resistance to your tyranny is nonsense. This has nothing to do with this internet forum and everything to do with the words you are on record for - words by the way I and others, see Sonny's post above, will zealously defend you have the write to post - which reveal you have absolutely no regard for the unalienable rights of all. Do you need me to dumb that down for you? You only care about your own rights and the rights of those you chose to care about, and could care less about any other persons rights.

Really? WTF are you talking about?

Do you know?

reply to post by thehoneycomb

Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.

What are you suggesting here, sport? That the zealous defense of unalienable rights for all people is an offense to you? Sigh.

reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux


Uhm yeah thats it....way to think outside the box.

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by sonnny1

 

Tell me how and I'll pass it along

No reason to wear a mask........That should be the first rule. Second,If the protest is moving,and some in the protest start to do that kind of damage,either get the police involved,or police them yourselves. Not hard to do. Citizens arrest,does work.

reply to post by thehoneycomb


..what?
That didn't make sense as a response to my post.

Early bird gets the worm, if the shoe fits.

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


I know. It's just crazy how a lot of posts on here just plain don't make sense anymore, gee I wonder.

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Of course it didn't make sense to you.

Chanting slogans and holding signs does nothing for the common man. ACTIONS speak louder than words.

reply to post by RSF77

Then what the hell are you talking about my "tyranny" and #?

I have all ready quoted your tyrannical views here, and then Sonny did the same here. Whether you are pretending to be obtuse or actually are matters not, all that matters is that you are far more dangerous than this imaginary "invasion" you speak of.

reply to post by thehoneycomb


Chanting, holding signs = actions.
You sitting in your chair making nonsensical posts = words.

reply to post by GogoVicMorrow


Think what you want.

reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux


Then I would say you have a reading comprehension problem.

Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux

 

Then I would say you have a reading comprehension problem.

Of course you would. What else can you do? You told me that if I had nothing but criticisms I should be silent, and that if I have nothing "good" to do I should move out of the way. My poor reading comprehension inferred that my own tireless efforts to defend the rights of all people is nothing "good" by your estimation, and my criticism of your dismissal of unalienable rights, according to my poor reading comprehension, means in your world view I should be silent. Kim Jong-il and his silly son would be very proud of you. Pol Pot would be very proud of you. Stalin would be very proud of you, but hey, their reading comprehension is probably better than mine.