It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Matt1951
reply to post by RealSpoke
There is nothing wrong with alternatives. But not nuclear - which is the worst. And probably not solar (too expensive) or wind -the large wind turbines are too expensive and an environmental problem.
Tesla had the answer - one day we will relearn what he tried to give us.
In the mean time, better to burn oil and coal than create more Fukushimas.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Originally posted by Brotherman
reply to post by ChaoticOrder
Thank you for posting that video I didn't have the ability to watch the whole thing but I did listen to it in its entirety and will have to go back and watch it/listen again as I'd really like to grasp what the old man is saying.
No problem, I would suggest you watch it properly. Shortly, when I get a bit of free time, I will pop back into this thread and take what we learnt from that video and make some mathematical estimations based on current figures of oil consumption and expected recoverable reserves.edit on 1-5-2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Iconic
Last night I watched a documentary, called Collapse.
When it started, there was a man in a chair, rifling cigarettes and facts alike, and laying the groundwork of why the financial instiutions of our country, or world even, has failed us on levels that are insane!
He was a whistleblower against the CIA for drug dealing in the 70s-80s, when he was a detective for NYPD, and followed a path of calling out murderers, and financial "WTFs" from our government, to put it lightly.
Well anyway, I searched around and couldn't find this around here, and finally found the full video on youtube. IF THE VIDEO GOES DOWN, which it might in like a week, then just search the internet,
I PERSONALLY BELIEVE: This documentary is extremely eye opening about the dots being connected in front of us. This situation described in the documentary is so big, and encompassing, that we NEED someone to link it all for us, unless we have a conspiracy room with pushpins pictures and string.
ATS, ENJOY!
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by Matt1951
Peak oil is a myth. With current technology, oil can be extracted from North Dakota at $80 per barrel. North Dakota is booming. North Dakota has more oil than Saudi Arabia. The US will be able to supply all its needs, and export a lot more, within 10 years.
The global warming idiots hate this. But it is reality.
i'm always confused by deniers of global warming...if i read what they say correctly
" go ahead and burn as much fossil fuels as you like, because this has no correlation to global warming"
to me...having billions of tons MORE of "burnt exhaust" particulates along with the increase in CO2 (a gas that we EXHALE out of our lungs) in our atmosphere is not exactly a good thing, even if it does not warm the atmosphere as the deniers say. i do not want to breathe more CO2 into my lungs....how simple is this to understand?
Originally posted by Matt1951
reply to post by epsilon69
I don't think peak oil is a conspiracy. It just is wrong. As HL Menken wrote, for every complex problem, there is a simple, neat solution - that is wrong.
Peak oil is propagated by the nuclear industry as it benefits them.
We can and should seek alternatives that are low cost and practical, such as distributed (small) wind, and hemp. Hemp is a "weed", it doesn't need fertilizer, and grows on land that is not useful for other food crops.
Reserves of oil are always drastically understated. We probably have hundreds of years of oil available, with what has already been discovered. And as someone else here wrote, it may truly be inexhaustible. The oil companies have been developing the technology to extract this oil, so I do not view them as part of a conspiracy.
While in general electrical engineers have dismissed Tesla's wireless transmission of electricity, MIT researchers have demonstrated the practicality of this approach. The key was magnetic resonance.