Ron Paul Backers Prepare Takeover

reply to post by Doalrite

You know what makes you look stupid... bold capital extra sized letters... if you cant actually argue your point just scream it louder till people give in... is that it?

Yes, thats it. I am asking you to stop insulting people because i cant "make my point". Thanks for playing.

P.S. Its called a "headline".

Originally posted by Doalrite

Originally posted by TsukiLunar

STOP CALLING PEOPLE DISINFO AGENTS, SHILLS AND TROLLS IF YOU CANT KEEP UP THEN ACCEPT YOUR LOSS DONT HURL INSULTS IT MAKES YOU LOOK STUPID

Jesus Christ people. Get a goddamn grip. First one to throw in an insult losses the argument.

edit on 30-4-2012 by TsukiLunar because: (no reason given)

You know what makes you look stupid... bold capital extra sized letters... if you cant actually argue your point just scream it louder till people give in... is that it?

Exactly, where did I, or you in fact resort to the use of capital letters and increased sized lettering to put our points across? We didn't, and that sort of posts just appeals to the "common masses", who don't care to research into anything and believe what their MSM tells them or in fact, BIG CAPITAL LETTERS!!"

You are not a mod, nor did you have such rights to peddle your opinion in large lettering to try and force your opinion on everything. Thank you,and good day.

Also, "lossing" an argument is non existent,
2nd line.

reply to post by TheOngoingJourney


What the hell do you even mean?? I am asking you to stop insulting people and you say your not going to listen because i used "Big Capital Letters"? My bad, I had no idea that you could insult people, but I myself am banned from using the headline tag?

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by TheOngoingJourney

 

What the hell do you even mean?? I am asking you to stop insulting people and you say your not going to listen because i used "Big Capital Letters"? My bad, I had no idea that you could insult people, but I myself am banned from using the headline tag?

Come on, you are trying to tell me that you have to resort to making your argument stand out by posting it in larger lettering than the standard ATS lettering, and also in bold text because you really want to make it stand out, and not stand out on it's own for it's positive effect it will have on all those involved in this debate?

Where do you see me or any other Ron Paul support resorting to using enlarged text or bold text to try put across their opinion?

Does it not make you see in the slightest that you are trying to force your opinion across by SHOUTING it at anyone who disagrees with you?

Also, I don't see how I insulted anyone, that is my sincere observation on ALL of the posts I have seen from Outkast Searcher. He fervently searches out Pro Ron Paul threads to deconstruct. How that opinion is an insult is beyond me, let alone it is in the standard ATS sizing, not BOLD AND LARGER LETTERING.

reply to post by TheOngoingJourney


See, here is the thing.

First, I "Shouted it(?)" to catch attention. You are right on that. So freaking what?? I was not pushing an opinion. I was asking people to stop insulting others. I am sorry you cant handle it.

Second, OutKast is human too. It may not hurt his feeling or make him mad when you people call him a shill or troll, but what if it did? He puts a lot of thought and research into his post and having them insulted, not on their merit, but on their political position is insulting to everyone who has ever debated seriously.

Thirdly,

I CAN USE CAPITAL LETTERS AND THE HEADLINE TAG IF I WANT

Fourthly, Ron Paul sure the hell would not condone ganging up and insulting your opposition.

reply to post by TinfoilTP


Your own media is corrupt to the core! I seek my news from all available sources like we all should!

Why don't you head back to your Faux forums?

Our commitment to Dr. Paul and America is unshakable! We will not settle for Mitt Obamney or the Douche that is in office now! More of the same is not going to be ok with me!

Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!

Originally posted by TheOngoingJourney
I think it is obvious that Outkast Searcher is a disinfo agent and he always seems to be first on the scene of any pro Ron Paul thread. His unwillingness to accept facts on anything that represents anything pro Ron Paul is very clear and shows what he is here for. Ignore at all costs!

Is ANYONE allowed to respectfully disagree?

Its a free country. People are allowed to disagree with you. If I don't like RP's domestic policies, which I DON'T. I choose not to vote for him. Its my right, and I am not automatically wrong because I don't agree with you. And no, I am not crazy about Obama, but I will take him over someone who wants to remove every protection the 99 percent has against the one percent. Also you (RP supporters) claim to espouse freedom. Does that include the freedom to disagree? If not, freedom is not what you are pushing, its something else. Ask any German.

Why does a Thomas Paine quote come to mind at this point....

“Lead, follow, or get out of the way.”

reply to post by TsukiLunar


Great vid.

Most people don't realize what kind of damage they are doing to others when they belittle them.

reply to post by openminded2011


On the internet?

No...

but its possible... but inflated ego's n all... kind of... make it extremely difficult.

Originally posted by openminded2011
Even if Ron Paul were to win the nomination, and the election, there is no way on Earth he will ever push his agenda through the corporatist congress and Senate. Ain't gonna happen. We are talking about a lame duck presidency at best.

Yeah, okay. That's fine. I'll take it.

I'll take a lame duck presidency over one which digs us further into a hole of lost liberty, out of control debt, and innocent people needlessly dying ANY DAY

Originally posted by openminded2011 And no, I am not crazy about Obama, but I will take him over someone who wants to remove every protection the 99 percent has against the one percent. .

edit on 30-4-2012 by openminded2011 because: (no reason given)

Just a question, and a real one out of curiosity, not rhetoric.. if Ron Paul, or in general, Libertarian policies would be such a win for corporations and big business, then why are they putting their money behind Obama and Romney? Why don't they put their money behind Ron Paul? And don't say 'because they know he can't win'.. if what you're claiming is true, that RP's policies would so greatly benefit them, they would have started funding a Libertarian movement long before Dr. Paul

Originally posted by Sek82

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Ron Paul couldn't beat Mitt Romney in a debate...he would have no chance against Obama. The debates are Obama's gold...Ron Paul will look silly next to him with his oversized suit, jittering and nervous chuckling and crazy laugh when he is trying to make a point.

Oh he don't like Ron Paul.

Americans realize after watching Obama play golf for three years while raising debt ceiling that being great at the debate podium doesn't equate to being a good President. Being a smooth talker won't be as much help the second time around. Well maybe it will on the easily amused.

Some people want to keep their benefits though, that is understandable.

Yeah, you are damm right some people want to keep their benefits. They want their social security, medicare and medicaid cause they paid for it in the first place. Why should I give a monkeys ass about states rights?

I will give him some credit though as he apparently dislikes the FED and is for limited international intervention.

But the problem with voting for paul is that you vote republican and people have been burned with the likes of nixon, reagan, bush jr and bush sr. You have to expect people will be quite reluctant to play the same card again.

I personally would rather vote for the worst democrat then vote for the best republican. Like me or hate me, that is who I am! And i would rather vote for a true socialist than vote for a democrat, but then again that seems a lost cause as everyone is being herded into the big parties.

Originally posted by bacci0909

Originally posted by openminded2011 And no, I am not crazy about Obama, but I will take him over someone who wants to remove every protection the 99 percent has against the one percent. .

edit on 30-4-2012 by openminded2011 because: (no reason given)

Just a question, and a real one out of curiosity, not rhetoric.. if Ron Paul, or in general, Libertarian policies would be such a win for corporations and big business, then why are they putting their money behind Obama and Romney? Why don't they put their money behind Ron Paul? And don't say 'because they know he can't win'.. if what you're claiming is true, that RP's policies would so greatly benefit them, they would have started funding a Libertarian movement long before Dr. Paul

Because obama is center-left and romney is center-right. Is this not obvious enough?

Ron Paul is right. Out of curiousity where were all the american super-patriots during the occupy protests and why where there soooo many tea party hypocrites on ATS constantly denigrating the movement along with all the paid neo-conservative trolls?

Please answer me these questions if you want to be taken seriously..........

Originally posted by bacci0909

Originally posted by openminded2011 And no, I am not crazy about Obama, but I will take him over someone who wants to remove every protection the 99 percent has against the one percent. .

edit on 30-4-2012 by openminded2011 because: (no reason given)

Just a question, and a real one out of curiosity, not rhetoric.. if Ron Paul, or in general, Libertarian policies would be such a win for corporations and big business, then why are they putting their money behind Obama and Romney? Why don't they put their money behind Ron Paul? And don't say 'because they know he can't win'.. if what you're claiming is true, that RP's policies would so greatly benefit them, they would have started funding a Libertarian movement long before Dr. Paul

In my opinion, to lend the impression he is incorruptible. They want both sides of the isle stacked. Not to mention the fact that he embraces their ideology quite nicely. He is anti union, pro free trade, anti labor. He wants to eliminate federal laws in place of state laws, which are easier buy off. He will create the infrastructure that corporate feudalism will thrive in. They dont need to throw money at him for him to accomplish it because he already has a lot of people buying the story. Thats my opinion.

Here you go...enjoy the video!

The Koch Brothers, both multi-billionares with interests in mining and looser government regulations.

Sarah Palin and Ron Paul= Republican astroturfing

The Koch Brothers, both multi-billionares with interests in mining and looser government regulations.

Sarah Palin and Ron Paul= Republican astroturfing

All you have to do is connect the dots. RP and the Koch brothers are joined at the hip ideologically.They both want to shrink the state. How do the poor and the middle class benefit from that? They don't, but the 1 percent will benefit tremendously. By making predatory capitalism safe from big government by eliminating it altogether under the guise of of "freedom" and "liberty". Ok here is a question, who will have the most freedom in that new America, a paycheck to paycheck worker, now without ANY protections previously afforded by things like social security and labor laws, or a multi millionaire?? Who does shrinking the government serve the most of those two people? Where will that paycheck to paycheck worker have ANY recourse? In the state courts? Doubtful as they will quickly be paid off. The endgame of free marketeers hiding behind this Trojan horse is that only those with money and power will be free, the rest of us will be their slaves (we are already 99 percent of the way there, but this will finish it). WAKE UP.