It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by femalepharoe
reply to post by freakjive
The point it illustrates is that you must INDEED me SPECIFICALLY MASONIC affiliated..it says it right there in the rules of admission you posted.
lol...
If fake URLs are created so easily you could have at least posted a fake URL that demonstrates your point.
edit on 25-4-2012 by femalepharoe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by freakjive
Originally posted by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by freakjive
Just posted this in another thread:
www.youtube.com... - can't embed this one?
What the heck is going on here...besides fraud? The Iowa State GOP chairman Steve Strawn resigns after the confusion.
Looks like Ron Paul may win Minnesota too.
spec
edit on 24-4-2012 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)
Let's try this link (the YT code in your video was longer than normal):
Good stuff, Spec!
Originally posted by freakjive
Originally posted by femalepharoe
reply to post by freakjive
Have you ever heard of lying?
1. Why is that page denied on Paul's site?? Obviously it was there
2. How is it that Paul's wife is an Eastern Star and he is NOT a Mason?
Just use some common sense on these two questions.
Yes...let's use your logic in the same way.
Point 1 - A fake URL can be created at will, on-the-fly. Say for instance: www.abovetopsecret.com/fairydust/magicsprites/
Originally posted by freakjive
Originally posted by femalepharoe
reply to post by freakjive
The point it illustrates is that you must INDEED me SPECIFICALLY MASONIC affiliated..it says it right there in the rules of admission you posted.
lol...
If fake URLs are created so easily you could have at least posted a fake URL that demonstrates your point.
edit on 25-4-2012 by femalepharoe because: (no reason given)
You're just being obtuse for the sake of being obtuse. Read the other affiliations. It DOES NOT mean that Ron Paul is a freaking mason. Her father, brother, uncle, etc could have been her affiliation. It says so RIGHT IN THE IMAGE I POSTED!!!
I did post a fake URL. It's right there.
I'm done with this discussion.
Originally posted by femalepharoe
reply to post by NightFlight
He's NOT??
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
Don't kid yourself.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
So...in other words,
Ron Paul is a Mason?
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions.
But I do wonder why you are listening to anything Rachel Maddow says. She is a far left liberal crack pot! If she begins to defend Ron Paul not sure if I can even start to begin to take him seriously. If I ever begin to.
Originally posted by freakjive
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
Actually, it should be noted that I have no problems with freemasons. I wouldn't have any difference of opinion of Ron Paul if he was in-fact a member.
All of the freemasons that I know or have known personally have all been upstanding citizens who would give you the shirt off their back if you were in need.
The only point I was making is that Ron Paul has said it himself. He is not nor ever has been a freemason.
We're just bearing witness to his haters contriving whatever they can to make him look bad.
Originally posted by femalepharoe
reply to post by NightFlight
He's NOT??
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
Don't kid yourself.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
Originally posted by freakjive
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
Actually, it should be noted that I have no problems with freemasons. I wouldn't have any difference of opinion of Ron Paul if he was in-fact a member.
All of the freemasons that I know or have known personally have all been upstanding citizens who would give you the shirt off their back if you were in need.
The only point I was making is that Ron Paul has said it himself. He is not nor ever has been a freemason.
We're just bearing witness to his haters contriving whatever they can to make him look bad.
I have no problem with you pointing out that he is a mason, or defending that he isn't...
>> I'm just making the point that;
A) It doesn't matter.
B) Unless someone owes allegiance to another organization that might supersede America, it's a personal thing.
C) Candidates are going to NOT reveal things that alienate a lot of voters.
Like Ron Paul could be an atheist -- but no atheist can ever get elected in our current society. Being an atheist has no bearing on ethics and they aren't the people who blow themselves up.
Since freemasons are generally benign and don't evangelize themselves -- they aren't a PIA like so many other groups. Everybody has about 30% crazy in their heads -- so it just matters WHAT they are crazy about and how they apply it. If we throw stones about stupid things -- everybody will be stoned.
So that means the whole argument;
A) Doesn't matter.
B) Cannot be settled without video evidence.
C) Would only diminish the conversation on important subjects.
In other words; don't feed the trolls.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by freakjive
We had been awfully quiet on this board until the last week or so in regards to Paul threads. I was afraid that the movement was dying. Well, it's really just getting started.
So you admit you are just here to spread Ron Paul propaganda? that's good to know! I'll be waiting for when he drops out in August! He might be able to sway some Romney and santorum voters but he's not going to win a single state tonight. Wait and see! 500 delegates down the drain right there. No way he can win!
PS I dont trust anything Rachel Maddow says, why do you?edit on 24-4-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)