It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by evilution
But all of a sudden he knows as fact that aliens do not exist in any form other than wild imagination? Uhh, uhh!
Originally posted by evilution
Another Galileo Galilei moment?
Originally posted by 11thdimension
OR-Perhaps he was paid a special visit or phone call?Not saying what he said is or is not the truth,but a flip flop like that seems a little bizzare.Only he knows for sure IMO.
"I just realized that I was spending far too little time with my family, especially my grandson pursuing subjects of fruitless and pointless speculation. I feel that for too long I have been mislead about the subject of UFO's and aliens which I now know do not exist in any form other than wild imagination. This will be my last post here on the FF on UFO's or any related subject and my good friends will not email, pm, bother me or speculate on this matter because the truth is I was wrong and open speculation will only cause me further embaressment"
If anything, Lear's position and story have gotten weaker over the years, not stronger. I can't see an entity (government or alien) failing to silence him a decade ago yet choosing to do so now. He's well out of his prime as a figure in the UFO world.
Originally posted by mwm1331
While he was posting on the guest speaker thread I kept wondering why the members of ATS were giving this guy the time of day. ... he was mentally deranged. Why he was given any credibillity in the first place is beyond me
While he was posting on the guest speaker thread I kept wondering why the members of ATS (who for the most part seem to be intelligent critical persons) were giving this guy the time of day.
Originally posted by Durden
Whatever the reason for this sudden turnaround by mr Lear, it seems to me that he opens himself up to even more ridicule by saying it was all fiction. Then again, this may very well be the most effective manner in which to pull away from the whole thing once and for all.
My question is why weren't any of his more fantastic claims looked at with the same scepticism as say the claims of George Bush in the run up to the iraq war?
For example his claim of mile long domes on the moon?