It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
reply to post by sealing
You have to purchase auto insurance if you want to drive, not if you simply want to live in this country.
Most everyone will use the health services eventually...one of the flaws in life is that we eventually start breaking down...and when that happens, someone calls an ambulance.
Auto Insurance is required only if you plan on using the road...however, if you 'accidently" had to drive, your not exempt from requiring insurance...
People don't plan on getting sick...but people do, everyone does..not a single person has ever not gotten sick and ultimately died from it..batting 100% here. So, until such a time as disease, sickness, accidents, and death is overcome, then its fair to say there is a very high percent chance (like 99.99) that you, me, and everyone else will be using the hospitals, emergency rooms, etc.
So...insurance mandates seems to be very comparable to auto insurance mandates
Election Process is RIGGED – There is no “Vote” The puppet we call the “President” is appointed by the organized crime cartel. It is a giant HOAX. The fact is that we the people have never really voted in our entire collective lives for anything more than an increasingly more transparent puppet show. -Clint Richardson LINK
Originally posted by RealSpoke
I can't believe some of these people that think Romney will be any different than Obama. Stop living in the MSM fantasy that there is. LINK
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Because you have been "programmed" to believe LIES your entire life... Until you come face to face with REALITY and understand that everything you know is a lie, you will NEVER be entirely convinced of the truth.
"People choose ignorance on purpose in order to feel comfortable. It is basically an indication of weakness, and we live in a country of very week minded people. Our minds have been weakened by media overload and from the soft living of modern life."
Originally posted by xxSouthernGirlxx
It really doesn't matter who you vote for. We do not pick the president. We haven't in a very, very long time.
"God had spoken to me and said, "Since America wants wickedness and wants evil, I will give it to them until they choke to death on it. I will also give them wicked leaders after their own wicked hearts. Since they no longer find it fit to acknowledge me any longer I will turn them over to their own wicked devices."
Source
< br />
Gary Hubbell: The Redneck tree hugger says Obama is savior of America’s future
Excerpt: "Barack Obama is the best thing that has happened to America in the last 100 years. Truly, he is the savior of America’s future. He is the best thing ever." LINK
Obama as Savior - "I disagree that Obama is a different person that he said he was. I still believe he is a man of integrity and has attempted to do more in his first year in office than any president since FDR. I can't even imagine what our lives would be like today if he hadn't won and instead we had McCain/Palin in the white house. Now that is a sobering thought indeed." LINK
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by SaturnFX
... created a improvement of healthcare (still incredibly and woefully short of anything sensible or effective mind you..damn republican plan of nothingness), ...
"Republican plan" my ass.
I detest what Republicans have become, but at least be honest and give them their due. In the house, exactly ONE Republican voted yea on it. ALL of the rest voted nay.
I agree. They are two clown-puppets competing for the role of Punch.
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
First and foremost.. I think it is necessary to point out that this is not a Pro Romney Argument. Romney and Obama are two peas in the same pod.
Here I disagree. Whoever wins the election will only be permitted to do the will of the Real Authority, just as the current string of villains is doing. When you fight Authority, Authority always wins. You might point to your hero, Jefferson, as an example of one who stood up to tyrants, but what he did was in full cooperation with the Real Authority. He was not a monarchist, an oligarch or a plutocrat. He was the servant of the Will that controls things in this universe. You have to back up to get a larger perspective of what he was doing to see that. I am sure you have done so to a great degree. What I see is that all leaders of men are the same. They all serve the One. How much more, then, do we also all serve the One?
I urge each and every one of us to vote third party this election cycle and end this two party monopoly on American governance.
I don't see AN evil. I see a long procession of men, serving the Creator, dishing out the necessary suffering to humankind. Suffering, as I have been made aware in this life, is one of the best teachers one can have. In fact, in my whole life, I cannot look back on one bit of suffering I have enduredthat did not benefit my character. How about you?
There is no "lesser evil" there is only two people who pander to different people yet have the same views when it comes to their voting record.
I agree here. I think it would be awesome if everyone were once and for all disabused of the idea that choosing your leader equates to choosing (and getting) the kind of life that you want to live. People need to be their own leaders, and I can think of no better way to encourage that than complete disillusionment with the political process.
In 2012, lets throw a wrench in their plans. Lets write in candidates, vote 3rd party and reclaim the ability to actually choose our leaders. Please urge everyone you know to do the same.
how better to alert humanity that money is a fraud, and usury is a compound fraud?
Without further ado here are my 10 reasons not to vote for Obama this election cycle. [...]
#1
Obama has added $6 trillion to the national debt in his one term.
Frankly, I would rather any day be in the hands of the military (being a former military man myself) than in the hands of the mercenary corporate prison system.
#2
NDAA. Indefinite military detention, no attorney, no trial.[...]
He is only doing as his masters dictate, and his masters answer to the Master of the universe. Perhaps the pressure of unjust, fictitious corporate rules is being upped in order to encourage humanity to be more self-responsible?
#3
He signed an extension to the patriot act despite running on a platform that attacked the Patriot act and promising that if the extension crossed his desk he would not sign it.
I see this as yet more of the same... idiocy committed in the name of waking humanity. What people tolerate, they endorse. Americans tolerated this. I am not an American. I am a human being. I did not endorse that action. I fired the gov't some time ago (see sig)
#4
Libya. Obama authorized military action in Libya (otherwise known as war) without consulting congress, this alone is an impeachable offense in my eyes. His reasons for not consulting congress, he wanted to legitimize the UN... His words.
so what are you going to do about it?
#5
Obama care. No other president in the history of the country has ever assumed that they have the power to force american citizens to purchase a product. The federal government obviously does not have this power.
what do you mean "We", kimosabe?
#6
Obama has authorized the use of military drones to attack country's we have not declared war with. We are killing innocent people with these drones in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and only god knows where else.
and you were expecting..?
#7
Despite Obama claiming to be against SOPA, he went ahead and signed ACTA.
what a perfect illustration of a scam. I think they were great. they got my attention pointed in the right direction. I am now free. How was this a disservice?
[...]
#9
The Bailouts.
Just pushing to see what Americans will put up with (which is a lot).
#10
The seizure of GM and Chrysler, the transfer of bondholder wealth to unions, and the dumping of the GM stock at a loss
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'll agree with you...but add a caveat. We definitely have to vote out Obama. I agree. No question. The future of our nation is decided by the vote in Nov and that is sure no understatement this time around. However......
Originally posted by TheTardis
Bush didnt break anything. Was he perfect? No but better than what we have now and way better than Clinton who was impeached. He was handed a pretty bad lot from Clinton. He put more money in our pockets and gas prices were lower. No other president had the kind of problems to deal with that he did. 9/11 was a nightmare. I cant imagine how Gore or Obama would handle that mess.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'll agree with you...but add a caveat. We definitely have to vote out Obama. I agree. No question. The future of our nation is decided by the vote in Nov and that is sure no understatement this time around. However......
With Obama...Please, as you note by saying write-ins, lets make sure every incumbent of either party who has been there more than 2 years, is shown the door. I don't care if he's the dear old grand dad of your political district and everyone just loves HIM while hating everyone else. Everyone feels that way, it seems, so everyone gets re-elected.
Lets toss Obama...but EVERY office holder as well, right behind him. House members come up every 2 years and Senate comes up on alternate elections every 6 per term. That means we have only 4 years and 2 elections to effectively flip the House right down to the last rotten member. Seniority makes no difference when the vote doesn't work. The Senate takes a bit longer...but within a fairly short time we can have *EVERY* current Office Holder OUT...if people will just knock off the 'everyone BUT my guy is bad' garbage. They ALL have to go.
Originally posted by Mach5
I find it rather ironic that support for Ron Paul has severely declined (I meanSEVERELY) in comparison to last time. Is it because in a short couple years, the government has blocked all incorruptible free thinkers and demonized them?
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
I won't be voting because NONE of the candidates represent me.
Obama is a war president who signed away our civil liberties.
Romney is a flip flopping corporate shrill.
Gingrich won't win and thank goodness. He's the douche of the century.
Paul has no chance and even has some batsh*t crazy ideas.
Then you have just voted for Obama by not participating in the system. I would rather see you vote for him than not vote at all. I certainly don't want to see him win by default. Either way, you are accepting what we have now and are willing to go further into the socialist rabbit hole. It will be very dark down there. You are doing just what they are hoping for.edit on 19-4-2012 by Nite_wing because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
I won't be voting because NONE of the candidates represent me.
Obama is a war president who signed away our civil liberties.
Romney is a flip flopping corporate shrill.
Gingrich won't win and thank goodness. He's the douche of the century.
Paul has no chance and even has some batsh*t crazy ideas.
Then you have just voted for Obama by not participating in the system. I would rather see you vote for him than not vote at all. I certainly don't want to see him win by default. Either way, you are accepting what we have now and are willing to go further into the socialist rabbit hole. It will be very dark down there. You are doing just what they are hoping for.edit on 19-4-2012 by Nite_wing because: (no reason given)
Voting is an illusion.
You think you have a choice but you don't. Sorry if you feel voting actually helps anything.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Mach5
I find it rather ironic that support for Ron Paul has severely declined (I meanSEVERELY) in comparison to last time. Is it because in a short couple years, the government has blocked all incorruptible free thinkers and demonized them?
What do you mean support for Paul has declined? He has more than doubled his vote in many of the the primaries this time around.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Mach5
I find it rather ironic that support for Ron Paul has severely declined (I meanSEVERELY) in comparison to last time. Is it because in a short couple years, the government has blocked all incorruptible free thinkers and demonized them?
What do you mean support for Paul has declined? He has more than doubled his vote in many of the the primaries this time around.
Not really. The trend of supporting Paul has indeed decreased because the mainstream media really did succeed at throwing him out of the race....by ignoring him.
In 2008 his popularity was through the roof. Hell, even Rage Against the Machine supported him. But this time around, we're really hearing some of his wacky ideas and losing a good chunk of his young fan base. He is doing "okay" in the primaries but not great....however in the general election, you'll see a large amount of Democrats and Independents come out and show their support for the guy. If anything, if I "HAD" to vote, it would be for Ron Paul but since I have a choice...
No thanks.
People really have lost hope in this upcoming election.
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Mach5
I find it rather ironic that support for Ron Paul has severely declined (I meanSEVERELY) in comparison to last time. Is it because in a short couple years, the government has blocked all incorruptible free thinkers and demonized them?
What do you mean support for Paul has declined? He has more than doubled his vote in many of the the primaries this time around.
Not really. The trend of supporting Paul has indeed decreased because the mainstream media really did succeed at throwing him out of the race....by ignoring him.
In 2008 his popularity was through the roof. Hell, even Rage Against the Machine supported him. But this time around, we're really hearing some of his wacky ideas and losing a good chunk of his young fan base. He is doing "okay" in the primaries but not great....however in the general election, you'll see a large amount of Democrats and Independents come out and show their support for the guy. If anything, if I "HAD" to vote, it would be for Ron Paul but since I have a choice...
No thanks.
People really have lost hope in this upcoming election.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by nenothtu
Negative. I will not be patronizing hospitals, nor will I be purchasing "health care insurance", mandate or no. Not gonna happen. I can die in bed at home just as comfortably as I can die in bed in a hospital, and quite a bit less expensively.
Nope, I'm not participating in your "health care" lotto in any form.
You get in a car accident, or are found unconsciouss anywhere....you will be participating in the hospital system.
You don't have a choice...sorry.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by SaturnFX
... created a improvement of healthcare (still incredibly and woefully short of anything sensible or effective mind you..damn republican plan of nothingness), ...
"Republican plan" my ass.
I detest what Republicans have become, but at least be honest and give them their due. In the house, exactly ONE Republican voted yea on it. ALL of the rest voted nay.
in the 90s, The Clinton administration tried to pass a universal health care system.
The GOP refused this, and instead offered up a mandated health insurance counter to it.
It was their plan, Deal with it.
You say you don't like what republicans have become? interesting, because year after year, they are becoming more and more fringe right. And the Dems are taking up old platforms of the former republicans. So..I guess your a Democrat now.
I personally want a unversal/single payer system frankly...so, neither side got what they want...the "new" republicans don't like the old republican idea of the individual mandate, instead keep things same ole same ole (aka, let our taxes pay for unpaid hospital bills as usual) and the older school Dems want it simply absorbed from the front through a tax fee, and everyone is covered..then we don't have to even discuss health care anymore.
Life, Liberty, and the persuit of happiness. Frankly, I would rather my tax dollars going towards curing someones cancer verses making a bomb to help out some company..just my view on things.
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
#5
Obama care. No other president in the history of the country has ever assumed that they have the power to force american citizens to purchase a product. The federal government obviously does not have this power.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by sageofmonticello
#5
Obama care. No other president in the history of the country has ever assumed that they have the power to force american citizens to purchase a product. The federal government obviously does not have this power.
Except Social Security insurance, Medicare Insurance, Unemployment Insurance...all purchased in every paycheck.
This is where you say, yes...but that is through the government and not private industry...