It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by foible
Here is a section of one of the photos tweeked a bit in photoshop, to show the obvious artifacts from pasting the UFO onto the scene. DEBUNKED!
edit on 13-4-2012 by foible because: Didn't insert image correctly
Originally posted by foible
Here is a section of one of the photos tweeked a bit in photoshop, to show the obvious artifacts from pasting the UFO onto the scene. DEBUNKED!
edit on 13-4-2012 by foible because: Didn't insert image correctly
Those who use the World Wide Web may be familiar with the irregularities known as compression artifacts that appear in JPEG images, which may take the form of noise around contrasting edges (especially curves and corners), or blocky images, commonly known as 'jaggies'. These are due to the quantization step of the JPEG algorithm. They are especially noticeable around sharp corners between contrasting colors (text is a good example as it contains many such corners). The analogous artifacts in MPEG video are referred to as mosquito noise, as the resulting "edge busyness" and spurious dots, which change over time, resemble mosquitoes swarming around the object.
These artifacts can be reduced by choosing a lower level of compression; they may be eliminated by saving an image using a lossless file format, though for photographic images this will usually result in a larger file size. The images created with ray-tracing programs have noticeable blocky shapes on the terrain. Certain low-intensity compression artifacts might be acceptable when simply viewing the images, but can be emphasized if the image is subsequently processed, usually resulting in unacceptable quality.....
If it's a real photo, he's toast already, and the MIB's are en route. If it's a fake photo GEL is gonna toast him! Posting a story like this is a no-win situation, and I commend anyone treading out on the thin ice!
Originally posted by Unity_99
Originally posted by foible
Here is a section of one of the photos tweeked a bit in photoshop, to show the obvious artifacts from pasting the UFO onto the scene. DEBUNKED!
edit on 13-4-2012 by foible because: Didn't insert image correctly
I don't even believe this kind of thing anymore.
Tweaked a bit in photoshop you say?
There is an enormous and unusual exotic type of energy used in the crafts, with shielding capacity, bubble capacity, they can vanish, rapidly oscillate, zigzag, just amazing behaviors.
I really don't believe any conclusions you're drawing.
I've had enough of being led down the garden trail by the debunkers who can attack people nonstop.
These 3 images cover 21 seconds, 1 meter elevation difference, a slight movement in both latitude and longitude and could not have ALL been taken with a single push of the button. Even if the timing is "off" like he claimed, and they were indeed 3 consecutive images, one would have been blurry since he moved.
Originally posted by Unity_99
I'm going to repeat this, because what I posted about "time" may have been a distraction, however the principles of usage of the reality of "no time" and compartmentalizing infinities (which s a hallmark of ET), can apply to anything including oddities when you take pictures. Which is why I posted it.
The point is, if you click rapidly, and your ufo is all over the place, no conventional craft could do that. ET can, Et could be upside down, zigzagged across the sky, vanished, reappeared, oscillating and moving, in fact if anything, this gives a bigger probability to it being ET.
However, I suspect our black ops have some of this tech too. But their crafts, even exotic ones, still tend to fly straight like jets or planes.edit on 13-4-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BIHOTZ
These 3 images cover 21 seconds, 1 meter elevation difference, a slight movement in both latitude and longitude and could not have ALL been taken with a single push of the button. Even if the timing is "off" like he claimed, and they were indeed 3 consecutive images, one would have been blurry since he moved.
what I don't get is this.
We are talking about technology we don't understand. We know it can go thousands of miles an hour and then stop on a dime. We know it can zig zag, drop rise and go in ANY direction in seconds. What is this argument based on? sound knowledge of the physical limitations of this craft?
He moved so it would be blurry? really? I have taken pictures running and they turned out fine. I am not a master photographer but I can do this. I did it the other day with my friends dog running while I chased him in the opposite direction.
You are telling me that that argument is definitively PROOF this poor guy faked this. Pfft. Like anyone here is an expert on the laws of physics these crafts operate within. We even think they might bend space time. WTH
I think this guy is a victim of ban happy-ness.
I have read utter crap from people here and yet they remain. mind you that is fine.
You could say hoax if you found the exact object he filmed. Or you reproduced the similar pictures yourself. To go on a hunch and offer such a weak argument for basically offending a fellow skeptic is just lame. You say it is impossible, because you know how these crafts operate huh. Where did you guys get that education. I would like to know so I can send my kids there. Maybe then they can learn how to build flying saucers and teach people about how they work.
hell maybe he made a mistake renaming them. who cares that is CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence not definitive proof to reject this guy and yet respect other dumb claims based on jell-o arguments.
it just gets me how absolutely convinced you people are. Damn. You guys have all the answers don't you.
edit on 13-4-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)edit on 13-4-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BIHOTZ
reply to post by Vasa Croe
yes and yet we all agree he RENAMED THEM so it could have been anything originally.
besides that are you absolutely sure that what is in the pics is fake?
here
A.Object 1 2 and 3
Date/Time 1812:15:15 15:15:15
should I attach a picture of something real to that label I just made of time and place for you to say it is not there as well?
It's not unusual for GPS coordinates to "walk" while the receiver is actually stationary. The NAVSTAR constellation is about 22,200 kilometers above the Earth, and the satellites are constantly moving with a 12 hour orbit. Your position is determined by your place at the intersection of a minimum of 3 "shells" around the satellites You are at the point where all 3 intersect), which are constantly moving as the satellites orbit. Because of that motion, it appears that the receiver is moving when it really isn't