It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by Frith
While the Democrats have their problems, there are clearly differences between the two parties, and the Republicans are far more for big government, and government interference in how we live our lives.
Conservative claims that the Republicans are for smaller government are pure fantasy. They refuse to look at the reality of what Republican politicians actually do. They promise one thing, but deliver another.
Originally posted by LErickson
Originally posted by Jobeycool
Do you realize all the rights you fight for in America as a liberal would be gone under Sharia Law.Factual 100% true.
That is not even a little bit true.
I wish you people would educate yourselves about Sharia law just a little. That would help. Listening to FOX news does not count.
Tell me again why I am not threatened by my Muslim neighbor who does follow Sharia law? I am not a dead infidel yet.
Originally posted by braindeadconservatives
SO Erickson, since you are liberal
I wanna know why you like to murder little babies for fun?
Since you would rather be in Russia, why don't you just move there
and let the rest of us be? I sincerely want to know
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Again you are lambasting me for something you know nothing of.
Clearly in another thread you did not know anything of Margaret Sanger and the fact that she started Planned Parenthood and you do not know of the Rockefeller de-population agenda(just study the UN Agenda 21 already) so it was easier to just call me racist since you cannot argue a truly intellectual point on the matter.
Next, you do not understand the implications of Sharia Law in our Constitution, so again just lambaste me with nothing but rhetoric.
Again, it requires deeper study than you have achieved.
Unless you can point by point prove to me you know something about the subject.
How about if you tell me what you find intriguingly great about Sharia?
Perhaps you heard that it's some kind of great accounting principles.....that is it is against certain banking tendencies. But then oh Timothy Geithner should have known better when he was advocating for AIG Sharia Compliant insurance. He is Establishment accountant is he not?
Originally posted by Propulsion
Top reasons why Sharia law is bad…
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by LErickson
I totally disagree with you on Sharia law.
The purpose of Islam, like Catholicism, is world domination.
What the Muslims need is a good ole Protestant movement against the radicals, eliminating the extremism of Islam.
Originally posted by seabag
As others have pointed out, Muslim beliefs are firmly against homosexuality and Muslims are commanded to live by Sharia. Here is one of hundreds of examples:
I still don't see how supporting both isn't a conflict of interest...
Originally posted by seabag[/i
1) Homosexuality and Muslims - Devote Muslims kill homosexuals for being homosexual (fact). Yet, liberals support both the Homosexual agenda in America as well as Muslim Sharia Law. What gives?
They are 2 different things. I have no interest in getting involved in anyones sex life or religious life. Both are intensely personal and in return I don't want anyone sticking their nose in mine. As long as children or animals are left out and all parties are consenting adults really, I would have to ask why one person would feel compelled to get into such personal things with others, especially strangers. Not all Muslims practice Sharia and not all gays like fisting. Neither is of interest to me.
2) Racism – (Hot topic these days…I know…I will tread lightly) It seems liberals keep the term “racists” alive. Why are vocal black democrats given praise by the left (Sharpton, Jackson, Rangel, Shiela Jackson Lee, etc) while vocal black conservatives (Clarence Thomas, Alan West, Herman Cain, etc) called names by the left?
The term is alive because the disease is thriving. It goes in every direction and is not solely a black/white thing. It is a disease of ignorance. Thomas is supposed to be a nonpartisan supreme court judge. These appointments are for life in order to keep politics out. I am not going to list the things he has been participating in as all know them, for me I didn't like him going back to what he did to Anita Hill.
Also, why do liberals continue to promote social programs that enslave blacks at poverty level? Left policies have NEVER led to black prosperity (Chicago, Detroit, ALL of California, etc are good examples) yet they get the majority of the black vote. What does the left offer that should inspire black Americans and keep their vote? I think the tide is turning, by the way. This video is a good illustration of what I’ve said.
Do you think only black people participate in social programs that are awful? Are all of the poor only black? That would be news to me. There are lots of reasons to support social programs because they promote opportunity. They are also a lot better than the alternative of doing nothing. Most of the social programs do perpetuate poverty or at least encourage it. How about working on things to improve programs rather than just tossing them out and letting people sink or swim?
What do you think would happen when millions of people are told just that? I think things would get very ugly out of necessity.
3) Pro Women yet Anti Conservative Women – Liberals say they’re for women’s rights yet they destroyed Sarah Palin and her family in 2008. Liberals love Hillary but what did they have to say about Condoleezza?? Have liberals ever denounced all of the chauvinist remarks about Bachman?
Palin did herself in and didn't need anyone else to pull her down. I am far from thrilled with Hillary. I tend to reserve judgement based on action rather than gender.
LAST BUT NOT LEAST…
4) Pro Abortion yet Anti-Death Penalty – Need I say more on this issue?
I don't know anyone that is pro abortion so much as pro choice. As it is we have people complaining about 'welfare babies' and as pretty as some like to try to paint it adoption is not always as rosey as some think.It is the mother that must grow that baby, then birth and often raise it on her own. Maybe she is unable to do so at the time, maybe it came from rape or incest. Maybe there is some problem with it, who knows. Bottom line is she must live with that decision for the rest of her life either way and neither is forgotten.
I’m really not looking for a fight and I truly want to understand what my fellow Americans of the liberal persuasion are thinking, particularly on these issues. I have other questions but this is good enough to get the ball rolling. I will keep my responses civil and on topic and I ask that you do the same.
What say you?
For me one of the biggest differences I see between the two sides you ask about is that one is all about the individual and the other is about the group.There are extremes on both sides. I am opposed to people losing some sense of being unique and thus just becoming another drone in the hive, but I find it abhorrent that anyone is so selfish that they can not have an ounce of compassion for another human being. Many cling so tight to the idea that if you just work hard you will get rich and have a nice (insert items here) this is a myth. I see the right say socialism as if they are uttering a profanity that will bring the wrath of God, yet when I look at a country like Norway I see people with the highest quality of life in the world. We cling to our myth while almost half of our people are either living in poverty or are just a paycheck away. I hear all kinds or religious words thrown around but when it comes to caring for each other the mentality is " I got mine to hell with you"
[/qu
You are a propagandist, with religious xenophobia. You are the kind of person I find far more dangerous to my existence and my way of life than a Muslim person living in a country free of religious persecution
I think it has to do more with the way you framed the questioned, and which answers you decided to reply to. You only seem to be making time for the answers that cause the most controversy with little regards to the vast majority of people identifying as liberals that have completely decimated your questions.
You are not a seeker of truth. You are a stirrer of trash.
i agree. do you know if there is some way to report this idiot to the moderators for this thread? such bigotry and trolling truly shouldn't be allowed on this forum
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Furbs
I think it has to do more with the way you framed the questioned, and which answers you decided to reply to. You only seem to be making time for the answers that cause the most controversy with little regards to the vast majority of people identifying as liberals that have completely decimated your questions.
You are not a seeker of truth. You are a stirrer of trash.
That’s not true. It’s quite difficult and time consuming to respond to 370+ responses. If I'm a 'stirrer of trash' then tell me what trash I was stirring.
I addressed the general theme of the responses…Palin is an idiot which is why the left are justified in lambasting her, Sharpton isn’t liked by the left so the left can’t be responsible for his racism, a fetus isn’t a life, etc.
I read it…what should I say to that?
Sarah Palin is an individual that some people do not like for reasons that are their own.
Al Sharpton is an individual that some people do not like for reasons that are their own.
Originally posted by seabag
Why can’t liberals disagree with Sarah Palin without sexist comments?
Again, when he and others are called out on their political views it’s said to be ‘because they’re black’ rather than just a disagreement. Do you remember the names Clarence Thomas was called by the left? How about the names Herman Cain was called? These were hatful, racist remarks and they went unchecked. Why can’t people disagree with a black liberal without racism being brought up yet racism is the first thing brought up when a conservative disagrees with a black liberal?
Maybe the reason so many have gotten their panties in a bunch over my questions is because they simply don’t understand the question or they are oblivious to the inconsistencies and double standards in play??