It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ColAngus
Originally posted by shortsticks
It's kind of pointless at this point to try and explain to the likes of you.
In my experience, when someone pulls the "you wouldn't understand so I'm not going to explain it" card, it means they've been skunked.
How are you posting so prolifically if you're down to your last penny? I'm just trying to understand here.
edit on 5-4-2012 by ColAngus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by shortsticks
reply to post by TheProphetMark
exactly and like I already said, this is the movement or reason I should say to keep children indoors. the direct consequence is having ADD children, the alternative being all of our kids having skin cancer.
Originally posted by shortsticks
I'm 99.99999999999% certain that
no one (100% of everybody) will survive.
Originally posted by ColAngus
reply to post by MamaJ
You know I was addressing the OP. He's stated he believes this event will occur on 12/21/12 and that 99.9999999% of the population will be destroyed.
Regardless, thanks for your personal responses to those questions. I haven't lost a child as you described, but I have lost a parent very much like that. Take that as you wish.
Originally posted by gaurdian2012
crazy perhaps but your definately on to something I too am old enough to remember looking directly at the sun bright golden yellow circa 70's now the sun is blue white in appearance so something has changed infact my theory is the global warming is due to the sun not the amount of carbon we waste star and flag for stating the obvious
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by mayabong
I'm an advocate of sungazing and recommend it to anyone. I stared at the sun for 30 minutes straight yesterday. Start slow at dawn, your eyes get strong.
Yeah, no. Do not stare at the Sun. New Agers like David "I'm a LIAR" Wilcock advocate staring into the Sun but science and people with damaged retina's are the PROOF anyone needs that staring into the Sun is a terrible idea that can and will lead to physical damage your eyes.
Again, to those that think Sun gazing is a good idea, it's not.
Originally posted by mayabong
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by mayabong
I'm an advocate of sungazing and recommend it to anyone. I stared at the sun for 30 minutes straight yesterday. Start slow at dawn, your eyes get strong.
Yeah, no. Do not stare at the Sun. New Agers like David "I'm a LIAR" Wilcock advocate staring into the Sun but science and people with damaged retina's are the PROOF anyone needs that staring into the Sun is a terrible idea that can and will lead to physical damage your eyes.
Again, to those that think Sun gazing is a good idea, it's not.
I'm speaking directly from experience. Yes your eyes do get stronger and your vision actually improves. You need to start slow.. 10 seconds at dawn.. next day 20 seconds and so on. Eventually staring at the sun is as easy as staring at a lightbulb in your living room. Improved vision is not the only benefit, but also physical and mental well being. This is not a "new age" thing its actually very old. Like I said yes, if you stare at the midday sun without training your eyes you will burn your retinas. You don't go for the gym the first time and try to benchpress a huge amount of weight, you start slow.
sunyoga.info...
Everything this guy says in the video is 100% true.
edit on 5-4-2012 by mayabong because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by mayabong
We get that you believe in this nonsense but the fact is staring into the Sun is harmful to your physical self, and no video about a Costa Rican farm is going to convince me otherwise.
Originally posted by Furbs
Originally posted by Realtruth
Without proof, facts, or links has anyone noticed the difference in the suns brightness?
I love that someone named Realtruth is asking people to forgo proof and facts.
It really is a testament to the anti-intellectual mentality that is creeping into ATS.
Originally posted by mayabong
Originally posted by Swills
Originally posted by mayabong
I'm an advocate of sungazing and recommend it to anyone. I stared at the sun for 30 minutes straight yesterday. Start slow at dawn, your eyes get strong.
Yeah, no. Do not stare at the Sun. New Agers like David "I'm a LIAR" Wilcock advocate staring into the Sun but science and people with damaged retina's are the PROOF anyone needs that staring into the Sun is a terrible idea that can and will lead to physical damage your eyes.
Again, to those that think Sun gazing is a good idea, it's not.
I'm speaking directly from experience. Yes your eyes do get stronger and your vision actually improves. You need to start slow.. 10 seconds at dawn.. next day 20 seconds and so on. Eventually staring at the sun is as easy as staring at a lightbulb in your living room. Improved vision is not the only benefit, but also physical and mental well being. This is not a "new age" thing its actually very old. Like I said yes, if you stare at the midday sun without training your eyes you will burn your retinas. You don't go for the gym the first time and try to benchpress a huge amount of weight, you start slow.
Everything this guy says is 100% true.
Originally posted by ColAngus
reply to post by mayabong
Ugh.
There's going to be a lot of blind hippies soon.
Originally posted by mayabong
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by mayabong
We get that you believe in this nonsense but the fact is staring into the Sun is harmful to your physical self, and no video about a Costa Rican farm is going to convince me otherwise.
Yep, thats what the eyeglass and contacts companies want you to think. After all 75% of americans wear corrective eyewear. Wouldn't want people actually thinking self healing is possible.