It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Furbs
Originally posted by justwokeup
- Presenting new evidence, or new insight into old evidence makes you a reporter/historian (ok)
- Presenting the same old stuff again and again makes you a hack (ok, if people want to hear it again)
- Writing fiction and presenting it as fact makes you a scam artist/low life.
Somebody dumb enough to fall for one of these scams would just fall for a different scam otherwise.
This is the problem with the entire genre.
There is no way of knowing who is 'legitimate' and who is someone in it for money.
What do you think of a person that gives new insight to old evidence that he doesn't believe is credible?
What about the person that presents the same old stuff knowing that it is all bogus hoaxes?
Again, the authors aren't the problem with this genre. The consumers are the problems. There is little discrimination between authors/publishers that promote 'factual evidence' [sic] and those that promote intentional fraud.
I mean, look at Georgio Tsoukalos. How is anything this man says credible evidence of anything? His education is in sports information and communication.
He isn't a scientist.
He isn't an anthropologist.
He is an author and television personality.
And yet he is a trustworthy source? Why? The consumers like him. His hair sells ad time for the History Channel.
Originally posted by justwokeup
Thats true. The horrible truth though is that the majority of people in the media fronting subjects or writing articles about them have little or no real understanding of what they write.
Its mostly recycled articles and repeated interviews.
When you see how badly the media treats a more mundane subject you really do know about it starts you worrying. My god, is all reporting this bad? on every topic? Eventually you realise, yes, yes it is.
Originally posted by ThisToiletEarth
I know a site that relies completely on the U.F.O. community and crappy videos surfacing. In fact without the videos ad revenue would be down and would result in amateur looking site.
Check out their site.
Originally posted by ThisToiletEarth
I know a site that relies completely on the U.F.O. community and crappy videos surfacing. In fact without the videos ad revenue would be down and would result in amateur looking site.
Check out their site.
A great deal more of what about UFOs? FACTS-TRUTH??? So where are they then? As far as this enigma is concerned, this is what everyone wants, is it not? But, after all the research these people have supposed to have done, they've failed to deliver!! I bet some have earned a great deal of money though-- as an example:
Originally posted by fleabit
And I daresay that Stanton Friedman probably knows a great deal more than you do about UFOs. He spent countless hours researching, requesting documents, hundreds of hours in archives.
Originally posted by dejarmaX
Basically they can write any ol' crap they want, suggesting it's the real deal without having to prove a fekin thing- knowing people will buy it! Not good when you consider some of the data is based on info from an anonymous source! Best scam in the world IMO. You 'go figure' & do the maths.
Originally posted by skywalk
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
well after seeing 3 spaceships in my life, im a believer and if you still deny that ufo, alien, etc are among us... well sorry but go back to your cave and just die there.
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
Great post so far everyone; however, If you read back on what I have written my point is this. These guys and others like them are selling this stuff as fact! Isn't that fraud? Shouldn't it be illegal to write about things that you are calling facts, or speak about them - when in fact they are not facts!
Sure we know their frauds, but others who are hard-core believers do just that ,,,Believe! Isn't it kinda a duty to save our fellow brothers who really don't know any better and are being sucked out of their ass-hole into buying this stuff?edit on 4-4-2012 by Mr_skepticc because: (no reason given)