"End of World" Imminent: This WARNING is very real.

Originally posted by Aqualung2012
Now, if we truly embrace and understand the nature of impermanence, then we can be peaceful. Even if this weather is leading to bleeding F10 FIRE tornados which cause earthquakes everywhere they go... we can be peaceful. Even if death comes, we can be unafraid.

Our impermanence is not something that we should embrace or simply sit back and accept, hence why we must secure the future of our species by venturing out into the cosmos - rather than accommodating wishy washy spirituality and fantasy as we close our eyes and secretly wish the nightmares away.

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

go to this site:
sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...

select SOHO MOVIE from left hand column

select 'LASCO C3" from the left hand column that now appears. Enter start date 20120306 and end date 20120307 exactly like i typed it in the appropriate box.. Notice that at precise the same moment the CME appears on the left side of the Sun, particle radiation from it reaches the instruments sensors. particles are protons neutrons and electrons, mass

If you can get into the navy LASCO archive which is not that difficult if you're a good website navigator ,you can watch movies with 1 second image intervals that clearly show particles arriving to the satellites instruments three to four seconds before the light of the CME......but this one is sufficient to prove light speed matter, which disqualifies and falsifies SR, GR and quantum physcis/

edit on 31-3-2012 by InterdimensionalWarrior because: (no reason given)

On page fourteen of this thread I suggested why this video doesn't prove your point about light speed matter. I'd really appreciate it if you would answer it directly.

reply to post by Exsisto


You would have to have a basic understanding of science to understand, and you don't

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

I have already provided enough data and verifiable information to convince anyone that isn't a half wit that the end date of the long count and the mass extinctions are connected. I have also debunked disqualified and throughout falsified general relativity, special relativity , and quantum physics, with incontrovertible empirical evidence..

WHAT????
where?

i almost feel guilty, likes its unethical to comment on someone so lost to any common reality.
it's like gawping at the freaks at the circus.


(apologies if this information was retro-actively given, i'm still catching up. it's very entertaining.)

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior
reply to post by Exsisto

 

You would have to have a basic understanding of science to understand, and you don't

There are literally children in middle school who have exercised more scientific understanding than you have in your entire thread.

Originally posted by Exsisto

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

go to this site:
sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...

select SOHO MOVIE from left hand column

select 'LASCO C3" from the left hand column that now appears. Enter start date 20120306 and end date 20120307 exactly like i typed it in the appropriate box.. Notice that at precise the same moment the CME appears on the left side of the Sun, particle radiation from it reaches the instruments sensors. particles are protons neutrons and electrons, mass

If you can get into the navy LASCO archive which is not that difficult if you're a good website navigator ,you can watch movies with 1 second image intervals that clearly show particles arriving to the satellites instruments three to four seconds before the light of the CME......but this one is sufficient to prove light speed matter, which disqualifies and falsifies SR, GR and quantum physcis/

edit on 31-3-2012 by InterdimensionalWarrior because: (no reason given)

On page fourteen of this thread I suggested why this video doesn't prove your point about light speed matter. I'd really appreciate it if you would answer it directly.

Then simply restate you reason. if it is the time period between frames watch the NAVY archive movie, which is harder to access but not that hard

reply to post by InterdimensionalWarrior


Right. Exactly what I thought. You're great at insulting people, and awful at presenting even the simplest of rebuttals to my very reasonable and logical argument invalidating your video evidence about radiation particles traveling at light speed.

reply to post by InterdimensionalWarrior


If what you are saying is true, about the kind of solar shot or kill shot and what is going to happen here, then I'm curious other than being elite and underground what is it that people should do?

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

Originally posted by Exsisto

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

go to this site:
sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...

select SOHO MOVIE from left hand column

select 'LASCO C3" from the left hand column that now appears. Enter start date 20120306 and end date 20120307 exactly like i typed it in the appropriate box.. Notice that at precise the same moment the CME appears on the left side of the Sun, particle radiation from it reaches the instruments sensors. particles are protons neutrons and electrons, mass

If you can get into the navy LASCO archive which is not that difficult if you're a good website navigator ,you can watch movies with 1 second image intervals that clearly show particles arriving to the satellites instruments three to four seconds before the light of the CME......but this one is sufficient to prove light speed matter, which disqualifies and falsifies SR, GR and quantum physcis/

edit on 31-3-2012 by InterdimensionalWarrior because: (no reason given)

On page fourteen of this thread I suggested why this video doesn't prove your point about light speed matter. I'd really appreciate it if you would answer it directly.

Then simply restate you reason. if it is the time period between frames watch the NAVY archive movie, which is harder to access but not that hard

I've refuted your irrefutable evidence, and now you're vaguely redirecting me to another archive movie, which may not even exist, rather than presenting the rebuttal yourself?

Hilarious.

reply to post by Exsisto


sage words my friend, but you should take time and comb your hair, it is starting to look like a book!

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior
reply to post by Skepticesque

 

These types of psychological tactics are useless against me. I know for 100% certain my iq is at least 50 points higher than yours, probably 60.

Say something on topic. You are not supposed to engage in personal attacks, actual retorts

For someone with a genius-level IQ, your grammar, diction, and punctuation are at about the level of a 5th grader. Your "scientific knowledge" is questionable at best.

This thread is an EPIC fail. No conspiracy, just a fact. You've succeeded in derailing your own thread with antagonism. I can't believe we get this many pages on a thread with no factual evidence, just a typical "doom and gloom" end-of-the-world fragmented rambling.

Originally posted by Exsisto

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

Originally posted by Exsisto

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

go to this site:
sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...

select SOHO MOVIE from left hand column

select 'LASCO C3" from the left hand column that now appears. Enter start date 20120306 and end date 20120307 exactly like i typed it in the appropriate box.. Notice that at precise the same moment the CME appears on the left side of the Sun, particle radiation from it reaches the instruments sensors. particles are protons neutrons and electrons, mass

If you can get into the navy LASCO archive which is not that difficult if you're a good website navigator ,you can watch movies with 1 second image intervals that clearly show particles arriving to the satellites instruments three to four seconds before the light of the CME......but this one is sufficient to prove light speed matter, which disqualifies and falsifies SR, GR and quantum physcis/

edit on 31-3-2012 by InterdimensionalWarrior because: (no reason given)

On page fourteen of this thread I suggested why this video doesn't prove your point about light speed matter. I'd really appreciate it if you would answer it directly.

Then simply restate you reason. if it is the time period between frames watch the NAVY archive movie, which is harder to access but not that hard

I've refuted your irrefutable evidence, and now you're vaguely redirecting me to another archive movie, which may not even exist, rather than presenting the rebuttal yourself?

Hilarious.

No actually you are refusing to restate your reason because it is a pointless exercise in futility and a distraction get me to waste my time and go back and search for the post while yo mount an organize disinformation op.. if you have a disqualification, what is it?

Originally posted by InTheFlesh1980

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior
reply to post by Skepticesque

 

These types of psychological tactics are useless against me. I know for 100% certain my iq is at least 50 points higher than yours, probably 60.

Say something on topic. You are not supposed to engage in personal attacks, actual retorts

For someone with a genius-level IQ, your grammar, diction, and punctuation are at about the level of a 5th grader. Your "scientific knowledge" is questionable at best.

This thread is an EPIC fail. No conspiracy, just a fact. You've succeeded in derailing your own thread with antagonism. I can't believe we get this many pages on a thread with no factual evidence, just a typical "doom and gloom" end-of-the-world fragmented rambling.

Then why bother even relying

BUSTED

reply to post by InterdimensionalWarrior

Since you keep referencing the Maya and some prophecy would you please post said prophecy complete with a citation as to where it comes from? I'm talking either the monument, stela, frieze, or manuscript that it originally comes from.

Since you are also referring to a cycle corresponding to 13 baktuns would you care to explain why there are monuments in Palenque that refer to dates far beyond 13 baktuns? Or what about Coba Stela 1 which refers to a date trillions of years ago?

One final question. If the Long Count did measure a cycle why does it only measure 5,100 years when the precession of the equinoxes (which is the cycle most associated with the Galactic Equator) takes 26,000 years and the time it takes for the solar system to leave and then return to the Galactic Plane 40 million years?

I am beginning to believe that there is a dedicated group of shills in this thread. This is the SKUNK WORKS forum. If you don't agree with the OP, please leave the thread. You will not convince someone who is seeking the truth, with the guidance of the creator, that the information contained in this thread is incorrect. If someone wants to believe they will. So all the people on here calling for this thread, or any other thread they don't agree with on the Skunk Works forum to be closed, GIVE UP. Go AWAY! The people who are actually interested in the OP want to hear the OP's evidence, not read through 24 pages of posts, from the same people, over and over. I'll state it one more time LEAVE THE THREAD IF YOU DON'T AGREE! Rant over. Sorry.

OP I look forward to hearing more of your evidence.

Originally posted by InterdimensionalWarrior

No actually you are refusing to restate your reason because it is a pointless exercise in futility and a distraction get me to waste my time and go back and search for the post while yo mount an organize disinformation op.. if you have a disqualification, what is it?

Here you go, pal. Let me hand-feed information in your own thread to you...

There are a couple of coronal ejections in this video. The first, smaller ejection starts on 3/6/12 at 06:18 UTC. The next, much larger ejection detected begins on 3/7/12 at 00:42 UTC ...

It takes light 8 minutes and 20 seconds to arrive at Earth from the Sun. Here's the equation:

Distance between the sun and the earth
= 15 x 10^7 km
Speed of light
= 3 x 10^5 km/s
Time taken by light to reach the earth
= (15 x 10^7) / (3 x 10^5) s
= 500 s
= 8 minutes 20 seconds.

If matter is traveling at the speed of light as suggested by the OP, by 3/7/12 00:51 UTC the particle radiation from the Sun should be bombarding the satellites.

However, the notable visible particle uptick doesn't really begin until around 3/7/12 04:54 UTC, roughly four hours after the larger coronal mass ejection. The particle bombardment doesn't seem to zenith until roughly 3/7/12 09:54 UTC, nine hours later.

I'm no scientist, but this video evidence doesn't seem to support the OP's claim of proof that matter is traveling at the speed of light. Nowhere near it, in fact. And there's certainly no evidence of a covered-up major scientific breakthrough.

reply to post by InterdimensionalWarrior


Terribly sorry ID but you are arrogant, lying on several accounts and show a piss poor grasp of science. The worst part is one minute you are fighting to save people then wishing their families dead out of spite.

The galactic plane and equator are entirely different. One by definition we never cross and the other will not be crossed for 30 million years. If you do not understand the real difference in those terms perhaps you should tone down the arrogance.

You claim all native american elders state there is some big event. No they dont. Although I am only a quarter native american the conversations that I have had with elders from various tribes call outright lies.

You say Hawking impressed no one before his illness. Being as it hit him at 21 that is possible. Albeit untrue. Several of his college projects are impressive. His singularity equations prior to being totally wheelchair bound was some of the most impressive work in the field in the past 50 years.

Mass extinctions? Not hardly. 600 dead dolphins isnt a mass extinction.


You also contradict yourself numerous times on your solar theories.

Much of your information about magnetic fields and solar decline and increase is wrong or contradictory.

You are far too arrogant while present errant information. Your generalizations being so obviously false are unscientiffic. And your mean spirit glee while threatening peoples families is pathetic. When someine calls you on anything you cry to the gods they are paid disinfo agents.


You may be some sort of scientist, just not a very good one. Science and prophecy are polar opposites. One is based in evidence, reason and proof. The other is the easter bunny. You also keep saying intuition. Do you really think anyone even remotely believes that you are credible? You are arrogant and overly emotional. You are hateful. You may be intelligent but you arent that educated in the field of science. You misrepresent yourself and others. I for one will be glad when this thread closes and you slither back to obscurity and spew your hateful nonsense somewhere else.

Good luck with saving the world and finding a forum for your lies and poor science. Maybe you can go save folks on david ickes forums.