So NASA says THIS is a "1 millimeter dirt" in the lens of SOHO spacecraft, BUT...

reply to post by burntoast


I like your theory. Can you tell me why I should believe you?

reply to post by dainoyfb


I do know which one it is, stereo after. I was saying soho as a description of the system as whole. Yes I know if the object was behind the sun for stereo after it would be facing us! I was playing with other theories to expand the conversation... yes a camera issue more specific a sensor issue reread my post I was trying to get and understanding... u never know before asking!

reply to post by burntoast

and can only be seen certain days in the year

It can be seen in images from every day of every year since the spacecraft was launched.
It is seen in the same place in every frame depending on the roll angle of the spacecraft.

Originally posted by ColAngus
reply to post by holywar666

 

It's posts like this that keep me coming back.

I have to assume that this is extreme sarcasm, because a person couldn't genuinely be that damaged to such a degree. Empty space shuttles.

Could that post be used as evidence for "chemtrails"?

See ya,
Milt

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by burntoast

 

It can be seen in images from every day of every year since the spacecraft was launched.
It is seen in the same place in every frame depending on the roll angle of the spacecraft.

So if one were loonytunes and believed it was a planet of somesuch, then would said looneytunes also have to believe that it's merely been hovering near, not orbiting around, the sun for nearly a decade?

Too much.

Originally posted by putnamcrab
reply to post by dainoyfb

 

I do know which one it is, stereo after. I was saying soho as a description of the system as whole. Yes I know if the object was behind the sun for stereo after it would be facing us! I was playing with other theories to expand the conversation... yes a camera issue more specific a sensor issue reread my post I was trying to get and understanding... u never know before asking!

No, you were outright arguing about something you know nothing about, plain, simple, and obvious.

reply to post by putnamcrab


Admitting your wrong is the first step in finding and understanding the truth.

reply to post by Mandrakerealmz


Are you kidding me? Why on earth should there be any delays in anything, since the fiber or whatever it is, is located within the imaging device, either on the lens or the sensor itself? Do you really think that the SOHO camera is so huge, that it takes a couple of seconds for the light to travel from the lens to the sensor?

For clarification; for every exposure taken, the sensor makes the image, with all the dust and specs etc in real-time.

reply to post by tsurfer2000h


I know... isn't it cool!

Reading all the replies. I have a question. Where did the dirt/fiber come from exactly? Was it allways there? If so it should have shown up before? Correct? So we are to reason that NASA creates a muti- million dollar space craft and the images it relay's back to us are contaminated with dirt/fibers?

Arent these things built in super clean enviroments? So some one tell me exactly where the dirt/fiber came from.
I wouldnt trust NASA to tell me the time of day. All the trillions of our tax dollars pissed completely away in space. Just so we can find out bean sprouts don't grow well in zero gravity.. yea it's dirt.

Originally posted by openyourmind1262
Reading all the replies. I have a question.

You must have missed this one.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Yes, it's always been there. Yes, it's shown up before.
All of this has been covered.

i just dont see in any way shape or form thats its more likly to be planet then dirt/lint on the lens or sensor

reply to post by Phage


Thanks for the explanation. It came from exactly who I knew it would come from I'll collect my $20 now from my wife. As I bet her who exactly would be the one to respond. Thanks for earning me $20 Phage!!

So for those who still believe that this is an object in space, what explanation do you have to offer for just how this object stays in EXACTLY THE SAME PLACE relative to the orbiter for it's entire mission with no change? If it is an alien worldship or Nibiru or something, I would expect it to move. I want your explanation for why this would be.

EDIT: NASA COVERED IT UP does not count because if they covered something like that up, they would just edit out the whole damned thing.

Even if that thing was a rogue planet or some similar anomoly, that thing is getting toasted if it is a real object. I would guess on this occasion that the official story is correct.

It is also important to note that even if NASA lies about a lot of stuff they cannot possibly lie about EVERYTHING. Truth happens, i guess

reply to post by Chadwickus[/url]

Despite the fact it's been there since launch?

ouch and there goes the theory of nibiru......................

For this is a conspiracy site, I wil try to extrude a little bit more this topic.
NASA intentionally left that piece of fiber, cause they knew they eventually will have some event to cover up.
2 cents chipped in

Originally posted by thirdeye3spiral
i just dont see in any way shape or form thats its more likly to be planet then dirt/lint on the lens or sensor

It is not a planet, it is a ship. it came and NASA wanted to watch it at every moment so they set up the cameras. it is sitting there and smaller ships come and go from it, they are busy with something and soon they will probably let us know what.

We are not supposed to know about it so there are plenty of people around to sell the fiber story and debunk any other evidence that there is ships coming and going to and from the sun, possibly arriving through the sun itself.

reply to post by Char-Lee

Yes.

And that ship carefully keeps station such that it appears in the same location in all of the images from a spacecraft which is moving around the Sun and rotates about its own axis. And it manages to do that while avoiding being seen by any other spacecraft or Earthbound telescopes.