It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So NASA says THIS is a "1 millimeter dirt" in the lens of SOHO spacecraft, BUT...

page: 7
28
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 11:53 AM
link   
reply to post by ColAngus
 


You believe everything your told? Mr. Sheeple?



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by putnamcrab
reply to post by Phage
 


so the sensor is made of something that detects frequencies of some type right?


stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...
you can read about the instrument packages here



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


different filters filter out different spectrums and block other spectrums... so... what are you saying?



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:16 PM
link   
My Bad y'all are right I am wrong Peace!

I was a Victim of not enough informantion! I hate when that happens

edit on 25-3-2012 by putnamcrab because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by emberscott
reply to post by Phage
 


My statement was quite clear.

How does nasa explain a fiber of that substantial size getting into that satellite.

What, was the slapped together in someones garage?

If it is a 1 millimeter fiber, it is inexcusable.

I am not, at the moment, even slightly curious about rotations or axes.





They sent up a telescope lens that was ground wrong.

Mistakes happen in human endeavors.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:31 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:38 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:39 PM
link   
gratings ats long time readed first time poster,now as for the 1mm of dirt most of the time i would be in agreement that nasa is misleading and/or covering up somthing about pretty much everything that is nasa/space exportation but in this situation i just dont see anything that would require that kind of action.weather it dirt a smug or scratch in my opinion nothing to cover up.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:39 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by putnamcrab
Who said The object rotates as soho rotates... Maybe you can show me... i have found that not to be so... please send me a link

So, you don't even know which space probe this whole debate is about, which means you posses no technical knowledge about it's instrument package and no knowledge of it's orbital dynamics, imaging techniques or capabilities etc. WHY are you even engaging (ferociously no less) in a technical debate about it?????



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:48 PM
link   
They left a whole piece of cloth in the fuel line of a $1.7 billion satellite just last year.
Delicate rescue saves $1.7B Sat
space tech is complex and things happen despite the best efforts.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 12:57 PM
link   
i44.tinypic.com...

btw whn the sun explodes that huge flare u can deff see a roundness of that object or w.e it is.... maybe its actually a dark star grabbing energy off the sun or maybe a craft but honestly im going with a other planet or star.. maybe its niburu or something idk but that pic comes out more clearer whn the flare is exploded..... way more round
edit on Sun Mar 25 2012 by Jbird because: removed img tags



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:15 PM
link   
also it makes a sphere how is DIRT OR LINT doing this? i44.tinypic.com...
edit on Sun Mar 25 2012 by Jbird because: removed IMG tags



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by burntoast
 


also it makes a sphere how is DIRT OR LINT doing this?

More of a ring than a sphere.
Don't you see a problem with the lighting if it were an object near the Sun?

edit on 3/25/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:25 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I don't understand the confusion on this one. Of all the pics I've looked at here this one is one of the clearest, and it looks exactly like what they say it is, a piece of lint.

The strange disc you guys are seeing is the result of the lint being curved.

Is lint seriously harder to believe than a alien ship that has not moved since they started taking pics?



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:32 PM
link   
I think its 100% normal for lint to be floating near the Sun. Cmon


NASA is full of crap, always have always will. Empty space shuttles, fake moon landings, fake pictures.

IT ALL EQUALS ONE THING = does space even exist as we believe it to outside earth? Is all this money being spent to deceive the human people into thinking there IS a universe/outer space? Throw in some UFO's and we got a conspiracy.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
i dont believe its a craft nor lint i think its a dwarf star or some type of planet that has been there for a while and can only be seen certain days in the year.... im not bying thw whole nasa says its dirt thingy.....



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by holywar666
 


It's posts like this that keep me coming back.

I have to assume that this is extreme sarcasm, because a person couldn't genuinely be that damaged to such a degree. Empty space shuttles.



posted on Mar, 25 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by holywar666
I think its 100% normal for lint to be floating near the Sun. Cmon


NASA is full of crap, always have always will. Empty space shuttles, fake moon landings, fake pictures.

IT ALL EQUALS ONE THING = does space even exist as we believe it to outside earth? Is all this money being spent to deceive the human people into thinking there IS a universe/outer space? Throw in some UFO's and we got a conspiracy.


It's not floating near the sun, it's inside the spacecraft on the sensor.

Does anybody read anymore?



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join