It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jesiaha
Am I the only one who thinks cruising around in your car with a gun playing vigilante, neighborhood watch or not is a strange behavior and its actually calling for trouble
Originally posted by jesiaha
Am I the only one who thinks cruising around in your car with a gun playing vigilante, neighborhood watch or not is a strange behavior and its actually calling for trouble?
Why did he get out of the car? Some kind of provocation must have taken place...
The whole ''Trayvon was trying to grab his gun...he WAS trying to kill him'' sounds like a weak conclusion and defensive statement. In those circumstances If someone who isn't a cop came to towards me armed, I would feel threatened as well. If it came down to physical altercation I would try to grab the gun as well to disarm him...That doesn't mean I would have any intention to kill him...thats ridiculous.
Originally posted by GhettoRice
reply to post by rebellender
Because he must face a jury of his peers in my eyes, (I don't know what will happen but in any case I don't recall saying he should be jailed or convicted without a just hearing)
Originally posted by rebellender
where is his crime? If you dont know what happened why ever did you post such words
Originally posted by GhettoRice
reply to post by rebellender
Are you implying that on one persons words alone when a life is ended there is no need to investigate the truth of those claims?
Originally posted by GhettoRice
reply to post by beezzer
There most certainly could be, be it media spin to not notice the Robert Bales story or just to rial up race tensions I do not know, I only have limited info to go by, I have chosen to use a larger data set than the OP has.
I cannot carry out personal justice as Zimmerman did, that I know for sure.
reply to post by popsmayhem
The biggest crime being commited here is the MSM distorting the facts. Obama using this as a way to garner votes, the hang the SOB mentality,
Originally posted by GhettoRice
reply to post by rebellender
? Double implication ?
So now your implying that he is totally innocent because of an ongoing investigation, (if they had the info they would arrest him)>right?
where is the precedence for something like this getting done with that quick in the legal system there is now?
Originally posted by MrWendal
reply to post by popsmayhem
You realize the only thing this proves is that a struggle took place. It does not tell who started the physical confrontation. The witness says all he saw was Trayvon on top of Zimmerman. He did not see who threw the first punch, he does not see how Trayvon got on top of Zimmerman or what caused the fighting. All this proves is that a fight took place, and we already knew that.
Originally posted by GhettoRice
reply to post by beezzer
Negative, I would as a respectful person listened to police and not aggressed a situation, this seems to be the logical thing to do even from your point of view being a seemingly law respectful person.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by MrWendal
reply to post by popsmayhem
You realize the only thing this proves is that a struggle took place. It does not tell who started the physical confrontation. The witness says all he saw was Trayvon on top of Zimmerman. He did not see who threw the first punch, he does not see how Trayvon got on top of Zimmerman or what caused the fighting. All this proves is that a fight took place, and we already knew that.
The witness and the cops, sure
think otherwise or with all the race
hate going on they would of had
to have arrested him. they havnt because
they have witness that backs up
the story, the witness saw and heard zimmerman
scream for help PROVING the 911 calls
for help were coming from zimmerman
not treyvon!!
PROVES ZIMMERMAN IS INNOCENT!