It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by jedi_hamster
Actually some police that were there have said they thought he should have been arrested that night, of course he says he's innocent, the witness didn't say he's innocent they only said what they saw and they only saw half the story.
He is in no way innocent. He is actually one hundred percent guilty the question was never if he was innocent it was if he was justified.
The fact is he may have very well put the kid in a stand your ground position before the kid put him in one. So in that case who is wrong. Even if the tables turned on him, the kid had the right to defend himself with force first due to Zimmermans actions. Unless you fools think Zimmerman got out of the car with his gun and then turned his back on a suspicious character. Why did he get out of his car.
Tell me this. He got out of his car close enough to the kid that the kid could get to him before he got back in? So he was returning from what? Talking to the kid? Guys get real. The kid didn't jump him Zimmerman most likely tried to detain a kid he admitted he thought was getting away that he showed actual resentment and hatred towards.edit on 27-3-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
he was monitoring his neighbourhood. as someone said, what would you want such person to do, nothing? watch people from the distance and not follow them when they look suspicious?
when he told the police that he's following him, he was told that he does not need to do this. NOT that he CANNOT do this, because he COULD.
act like a batman? he was returning to his car when he got attacked, he was protecting his own life. he tried to call the police, in return he got his head smashed on the ground.
if someone's obsessed, you are.
This shows that treyvon was a thief!
He was casing some apartments
thats what lil treyvon was doing.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by popsmayhem
This shows that treyvon was a thief!
He was casing some apartments
thats what lil treyvon was doing.
Are you familiar with the psychological term "projection?" Please look it up before you reveal too much about yourself.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Freenrgy2
Well.. there was only one and it did no such thing.
If there is another one I haven't read it, where was it hiding for so long?
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Trayvon’s backpack contained 12 pieces of jewelry, in addition to a watch and a large flathead screwdriver, which described silver wedding bands and earrings with diamonds.mine.
www.miamiherald.com...
HMMMMM, I wonder where he got
all that bling bling, NOT HIS?
OF COURSE IT IS NOT HIS..!!
This shows that treyvon was a thief!
He was casing some apartments
thats what lil treyvon was doing.
edit on 27-3-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)
I'd like to see it. Otherwise, your full of bunk as both eye witness accounts describe Martin attacking Zimmerman.
Originally posted by capone1
I havn't gotten too much into this whole incident, but I'd like someone to clarify something for me. I see all these posters on here saying "The MSM is lying to you about Treyvon! He was actually a thief!" Well, if the MSM was being racist, wouldn't they be trying to portray Treyvon as a thug, and not as a good kid?
Originally posted by capone1
I havn't gotten too much into this whole incident, but I'd like someone to clarify something for me. I see all these posters on here saying "The MSM is lying to you about Treyvon! He was actually a thief!" Well, if the MSM was being racist, wouldn't they be trying to portray Treyvon as a thug, and not as a good kid?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Freenrgy2
I'd like to see it. Otherwise, your full of bunk as both eye witness accounts describe Martin attacking Zimmerman.
Wrong. There is one account describing the two struggling. It does not say who attacked who. Other than that, we have audio accounts and the testimony of the killer, who admits killing the victim but claims it was in self defense.
I didn't say who attacked who initially. I said Martin attacking Zimmerman (i.e. smashing his head into the sidewalk over and over again).
Originally posted by DJW001
Are you familiar with the psychological term "projection?" Please look it up before you reveal too much about yourself.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Freenrgy2
I didn't say who attacked who initially. I said Martin attacking Zimmerman (i.e. smashing his head into the sidewalk over and over again).
Saying that Martin was "attacking" Zimmerman implies that Martin initiated the fight. We don't know that.
Oh god, really?
The word "attacking" implies action in progress. It makes no distinction as to who initiated.
Your choice of using the word "attacked" implies someone who initiated the action.
Don't twist my words.
1at·tack verb \ə-ˈtak\
Definition of ATTACK
transitive verb
1
: to set upon or work against forcefully
2
: to assail with unfriendly or bitter words
3
: to begin to affect or to act on injuriously
4
: to set to work on
5
: to threaten (a piece in chess) with immediate capture