187/188 DAYS ? ---- WOW----Strong 7.9/8m long earthquake shakes Mexico City

reply to post by November5th


I think this pretty much backs you up friend.



Came pretty cvlose to emptying that pool.

Originally posted by ragiusnotiel
reply to post by immortalreiku

 

again with the 7.9.. I'm so confused...

being that the number 7.9 was said, by USGS even though it was downgraded, you don't see a strange connection, I think its weird that they have a mock drill for a 7.9 on the day that an earthquake with the same 7.9 which was said even though changed happened. I think its odd. too odd, but I do NOT think it was man made, how is that even possible

Originally posted by November5th
reply to post by TheOneEyedProphet

 

I am in Mexico also.What is annoying to me is that many people on here are talking like this was no big deal.Like it didn´t excite and stimulate their doomsday obsession.Tell that to all of the people who were injured or who are now without homes.For me this was one of the scariest experiences in my life.

Thank you sir, for keeping this real.

It's kind of disturbing that so many people get off on the notion of bad crap happening.

Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine

 

I'm on your side here pal, I'm just doing the maths, this is a new one to me, and.....

Basing it off the Japanese quake, local time:

There was 189 days between the Japanese quake and the Fiji one (March 21st 2011 2:45pm - September 16th 2011 2:30am(?))

There was 187 days between Fiji and this one in Mexico (Sep 16th 2011 2:30am(?) - March 21st 2012 6am)

Obviously the 188 day theory is flawed by +/- 1 day, and given the amount of earthquakes worldwide, it is most likely just a rather large co-incidence.

It's not letting me upload my screenshot but you're wrong there too.. march 11th to september 15th was 188 days.

got to timeanddate.com

Also, THIS quake, isn't the quake we're waiting on...

reply to post by ventian


Now I know about the Fiji EQ, it works out at 189 days: Japan - Fiji, and 187 day: Fiji - Mexico, so the 188 day thing is already debunked.

However, if there is another strong earthquake in 185 days, then I might start to wonder..........I could be responsible for the 2 day countdown doom thread!

reply to post by hapablab


Perhaps the 7.9 was the drill and the 7.4 was the actual quake...?

I know I'm probably reaching, but I don't know- this whole thing didn't sit right with me from the beginning:

1. "earth ruptured" from USGS
2. "7.9 & 7.4" From ABC
3. different epicenters, ABC + Intellicast VS USGS
4. Staged Drill??? From Dutchsinse + Translated News articles

wth.. if that doesn't make a good conspiracy theory.. I don't know what does.
I think there's something way off with this whole thing, and that'll probably be my stance on these quakes from now on, regardless of whether or not I can really "proof & source" substantiate it.

If it looks like poop, and it smells like poop- it's probably poop. Regardless if theres a huge sign over it that says "this isn't poop"

Don't forget to factor in the leap year we had, that will make the 188 days off by a day.

reply to post by My.mind.is.mine


But it happened on September 16th, which is 189 days, you can't use the Japanese timezone and your own timezone to make you right, you can only use one timezone for an accurate measurement.

I concure posted data is strange . check march 14 2012 posts vary .1. but I agree 7.4 and 7.9 is really odd , probability is two seperate quakes a 7.4 ,and 7.9 , we will know soon when they use trianglition by more points to determine this data more accurately. 7.4 . News has been know to sell snow shovels when snow never arrived. All we stated was a 6.9 or plus 7.0 to 10 so 188 is perfect data in a imperfect world.

reply to post by camus154


I dont see the "Critical Thinking" process involved in your comment. I would think that starting with the date of the most recent signigicant earthquake and go backwards 188 days in sequence and see if significant quakes took place on that time line. Sake of arguement states quakes (mini-quakes) happen daily, question is..is there a 188 day cycle of quakes lets say of magnitude of 5.0 or above. We could do the 188 day count and see if there is and the magnitude of perdictable quakes. I think that would be interesting.

reply to post by camus154

It's kind of disturbing that so many people get off on the notion of bad crap happening.

You really are bringing nothing to the table of any value as far as getting down to brass tax of what may be an actual cause that we're looking at here. No one needs your negative bull. Try to come up something that will determine cause like the rest of us. Don't be so pathetic.

Ugh, none of it matters anyway because "this one isn't the one we're waiting on".

Good grief, it's like arguing over the second coming.

Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine

 

But it happened on September 16th, which is 189 days, you can't use the Japanese timezone and your own timezone to make you right, you can only use one timezone for an accurate measurement.

Mag 7.3 Fiji on September 15th...

Link

You're reaching. This theory can't possibly be debunked since we're only on the 187th day anyway.

Originally posted by camus154
Ugh, none of it matters anyway because "this one isn't the one we're waiting on".

Good grief, it's like arguing over the second coming.

WHY do you keep trolling? If you have nothing to contribute to the discussion, go to BelowTopSecret...

Originally posted by randyvs
You really are bringing nothing to the table of any value as far as getting down to brass tax of what may be an actual cause that we're looking at here. No one needs your negative bull. Try to come up something that will determine cause like the rest of us. Don't be so pathetic.

Oh puh-lease. Let's not have any false delusions of grandeur here, lest we think all of this is nothing more than massive ego stroking.

Not a single one of you has brought anything even remotely close to the table that helps explain the CAUSE here. All you're all doing is arguing over times and dates because "the truth is interesting".

Perhaps you'd like to change that now and start explaining how, even if a 188 cycle does exist, how that goes towards explaining a thing?

reply to post by My.mind.is.mine


Yes, this is the 187th day, but you are missing the point:

Using JAPANESE LOCAL TIME for the WHOLE explanation:

There was 189 days between the Japanese quake and the Fiji one (March 11th 2011 2:45pm - September 16th 2011 2:30am(?))

There was 187 days between Fiji and this one in Mexico (Sep 16th 2011 2:30am(?) - March 21st 2012 6am)

Obviously the 188 day theory is flawed by +/- 1 day, and given the amount of earthquakes worldwide, it is most likely just a rather large co-incidence.


SO THERE IS NO 188 DAYS, regardless of whether this was the one, THERE STILL WASN'T 188 DAYS between Japan and Fiji, THERE WAS 189 using JAPANESE LOCAL TIME as a reference for both, as it should be calculated.

reply to post by camus154


Oh my Ga are you really going to... Because an identifiable cycle might actually point to a cause. 123 abc breath in breath out. WTF?

Mind is right your trolling along by the wayside.

reply to post by woogleuk


Why in Gods name would you use Japanese time for both when only ONE of the quakes occurred in Japan???

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by camus154

 

Oh my Ga are you really going to... Because an identifiable cycle might actually point to a cause. 123 abc breath in breath out. WTF?

Calm down for a moment.

Expand on that. Let's say 188 day cycle is true.

Now what? What good does that do, other than possibly prepare every 188 days.

Are you closer to a cause? Has a single one of you posited a possible cause yet due to this 188 day theory?