It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by travis911
But they won't be helping the US in a conflict with China...
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
Why are the English contributors here getting off on sending one of their ships to take a missile for the American Navy ? The Americans treat you like DOGS at every opportunity. Do you think they'll send a carrier to les îles Malouines/Mavinas/Falkland Islands Colony ?????
Can I ask you, what the hell business is it of yours to send a ship all the way around the world to waters which aren't yours ???? The colonial mindset hasn't left you.
And to protect your little crapheap destroyer (destroyer indeed, never has the naval classification "destroyer" been used so badly, for the Type 45 is so poorly armed it couldn't itself attack a rowing boat in bad weather) ... to protect this ship, you're relying on European armaments i.e. French and Italian LOL ... and it's European weapons which aren't even in English Navy inventory because you can't afford them !!!!!
Originally posted by jcarpenter
Originally posted by travis911
Most Chinese doctrine suggests for weapons like this to be effective it would need to offensive....
Jog my memory please, when was the last time that China attacked someone offensively? Perhaps you can refresh me as to the last time they went on an empire building spree of false flags, illegal wars, occupations, murder, rape and theft?
Could it be that US strategy of "containing" of China and Russia are driving defensive political & military doctrines of those countries?
The invasion of Tibet began in 1949. Chinese occupation has resulted in the deaths of at least hundreds of thousands of Tibetans, the destruction of over 6,000 monasteries, nunneries and temples, and the imprisonment and torture of thousands of Tibetans.
Originally posted by regor77
Because they know you guys arent going to back em up. "Tuck Tail and Run" is your countries creed if I remember right. Maybe some Legionaires would fight but alot of those come from other countries anyway. Just keep doing what you do best and make art and croissants and we will handle the heavy stuff. Sorry, maybe only your mood is French but so is your stance.edit on 21-3-2012 by regor77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CaptainIraq
There will never be a war between China and the US in my/our lifetime. And until someone comes up with a working defense against ICBMs, there will never be a hot war between two major nuclear powers.
Moot point.
Originally posted by Justwork
Originally posted by woogleuk
Originally posted by Justwork
The Type 45 is a very capable craft, against planes only. There is no known system that can defeat the DF-21D, not even the Type 45 can do anything near it. Even if it could, we would need more than 6.
The type 45 has some of the most sophisticated anti-missile systems in the world.
Advanced air defence
The Type 45 design uses the Principal Anti-Air Missile System, now known in Royal Navy service as Sea Viper. It is a joint British, French and Italian design. PAAMS consists of a SAMPSON fire control and tracking radar, MBDA Aster 15 and 30 missile systems and a 48-cell SYLVER vertical missile launcher, giving both short-range and long-range anti-air capability. The PAAMS system is able to control and coordinate several missiles in the air at once, allowing several tracks to be intercepted. The SYLVER VLS missile launcher can be upgraded to accommodate other weapons if necessary. The Daring class have often been considered to be the most powerful air-defence warships in the world. It has been suggested that the SAMPSON radar is capable of tracking an object the size of a cricket ball travelling at three times the speed of sound. Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope has talked of the RN's pride in a Type 45 being asked to switch off PAAMS because it was "constraining the training" in exercises with US forces. Although the Type 45 represents a significant improvement to air defences, her anti-ship capability is currently limited to the single medium calibre gun and helicopter-borne Sea Skua missiles.
So it can track something the size of a cricket ball travelling at Mach 3, so something of a larger size should be tracked at faster speeds.
Anti-air
Sea Viper missile system.
SAMPSON multi-function air tracking radar. (range 400 km)
S1850M 3D air surveillance radar, capable of tracking up-to 1,000 targets. (range 400 km)
48 cell SYLVER A-50 VLS for accommodation of up to 48× MBDA Aster missiles. A mix of;
Aster 15 - anti-air missiles (range 2-30km)
Aster 30 - anti-air missiles (also anti-ballistic missile capable) (range 3-120 km)
It also has submarine counter measures.
And none are, thankfully, capable of stopping the DF-21D.