The MATRIX of 188 - LEY LINES of the 188 DAY Mega-Quake Cycle Discovered & linked to NEW MADRID QUAK

Aren't the ley lines of the world directly related to the magnetic grid?

Also, I think there's more to the ley lines than anyone has yet figured out...

Great find, OP. s&f

Why are the videos documenting something always coming with some silly and VERY lame music? They would be taken more seriously without it. I've never heard of this 188 day theory before it could be coincidence but there seems to be deep research on it, so way to go. Nice thread.

What about the Earthquakes in Italy. China years ago? Aren't they also big?

reply to post by LetsGoViking


If you followed the link you would see that I did not have to do my own analysis with any particular database.

The problem with earthquake lists is that this makes the high variance of the number of earthquakes per year evident in the result. The big variance be seen at the following link. From 2000 to 2011 inclusive the number of 7 to 7.9 quakes ranged from 9 to 23. That a big variability in the number of quakes.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

reply to post by uxon1

I hope I am wrong but viewing how many quakes there have been in that zone almost every day I could not see other hot place like that one.

Every day there are more than 100 quakes in the Los Angeles/San Francisco Area

The small quakes are not necessarily indicative of a big quake to come. There are often many small quakes in events called swarms that never h ave a big quake associated with them.

reply to post by Ghost375

Debunkers/shills quit saying the flat map line...that type of map takes into account the flat problem, that's why the map is curved. He mentions the statistics...why haven't any of you tried to calculate those? terrible debunkers on this website.

The claims here are ludicrous. Would you like to point to any stat that you think supports these claims?

reply to post by Wolfenz


The claims of ley lines is not lost knowledge. It is called modern fiction.

The original source for these claims from 1922 in which Watkins thought he found trade routes in England. These trade routes were change to magic energy lines by new agers. Ley lines are laid out by people that think certain places are special and they connect these places they think are special with straight lines.

In case you are wondering where this word ley comes from, it comes from lea.

Ley lines are modern. There is no ancient knowledge here. It is a way for people to pretend that magic exists by drawing lines for connections that do not exist.

Here's some information and a map of planetary ley lines from 1986. They are the same!
There's more information there about ley lines too.
www.crystalinks.com...

I believe in ley lines. I lived in a house that was situated where several intersected. Phones wouldn't work, electrical disturbances etc for every single person who ever lived there (built in 1940). The phone company called it "atmospheric disturbance" and claimed there wasn't anything they could do. Even stranger was that 2 psychics picked up on the fact that I lived in the middle of some ley lines and wanted to discuss it with me. At the time, I was annoyed by that. Our contact wasn't a reading and I wanted to take care of business. Who cares about some ley lines, right? I didn't. . . . until I noticed they really did influence the phones and electricity.

188 day cycles along 'major' ley lines...

let's attribute the cause to the Earth's inner & outer Core which has been changing/ been more energetic for perhaps the last 100+ years

then these inner Earth Mantle plumes become more pronounced along the specific Latitude Degrees by what is called 'Hyper-Dimensional Physics'

the 'major ley line' results because the Mantle Plume effect on any of the various tectonic plates on the crustal plate


So, indeed ley lines are 'deduced' from the deeper and concentrated energy which the 'hyper-dimensional physics' geometry says exists in certain places or 'lines'


i am still undecided if this thought-bubble/ theory is just Fancy or is Fact & True

reply to post by St Udio


The flow in the mantle is flow and viscous. Why would "Hyper-Dimensional Physics" be used?

I buy into the solar aspect of quakes alot more than this 188 day idea. Theres earthquakes everyday when you use a worldwide model. Previous posters have allready pointed out the fact that he leaves several megaquakes out of his equations.

Per neic.usgs.gov... NDEP2=&IO1=&IO2=&CLAT=0.0&CLON=0.0&CRAD=0.0&SUBMIT=Submit+Search

there have been 543 quakes magnitude 7.0 or greater world wide from 1/30/1973 thru 2/2/2012

Sorry for poor alignment and too big to post all

NEIC: Earthquake Search Results

U. S. G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y

E A R T H Q U A K E D A T A B A S E



FILE CREATED: Wed Mar 14 05:00:38 2012
Global Search Earthquakes= 543
Catalog Used: PDE
Magnitude Range: 7.0 - 10.0
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data


CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEM DTSVNWG DIST
NFO km
TF

PDE 1973 01 30 210112.50 18.48 -103.00 43 7.5 MsGS .C. .T.....
PDE 1973 02 06 103710.10 31.40 100.58 33 7.7 UKPAS .C. .......
PDE 1973 02 28 063749.50 50.49 156.58 27 7.2 MsGS 2F. .T.....
PDE 1973 03 17 083051.80 13.37 122.79 33 7.5 UKUPP 6C. F......
PDE 1973 06 17 035502.90 43.23 145.79 48 7.7 MsGS 8C. .T.....
PDE 1973 06 24 024325.50 43.32 146.44 50 7.1 MsGS 8C. .T.....
PDE 1973 07 23 012257.80 49.99 78.85 0 7.1 UKUPP ... ....E..
PDE 1973 08 28 095040 18.27 -96.60 84 7.2 UKPAS .C. .......
PDE 1973 09 29 004400.80 41.89 130.87 575 7.0 UKPAS 5F. .......
PDE 1973 10 06 150737.30 -60.82 -21.55 33 7.5 UKPAS ... .......
PDE 1973 10 27 065957.40 70.78 54.18 0 7.6 UKPAS ... ....E..
PDE 1973 12 28 134145.80 -14.46 166.60 26 7.8 UKBRK 7D. .......
PDE 1973 12 29 001931.10 -15.12 166.90 47 7.2 MsGS 7D. .......
.
.
.
.
.
PDE-W 2011 01 01 095658.12 -26.80 -63.14 576 7.0 MwWCMT 5FM .......
PDE-W 2011 01 02 202017.78 -38.35 -73.33 24 7.2 MwWCMT 7FM .......
PDE-W 2011 01 13 161641.54 -20.63 168.47 9 7.0 MwWCMT 2FM .......
PDE-W 2011 01 18 202323.48 28.78 63.95 68 7.2 MwWCMT 5CM .......
PDE-W 2011 03 09 024520.33 38.44 142.84 32 7.3 MwWCMT 5FM .......
PDE-W 2011 03 11 054624.12 38.30 142.37 29 9.0 MwWCMT XCM STS...M
PDE-W 2011 03 11 061540.28 36.28 141.11 42 7.9 MwUCMT 8FM .......
PDE-W 2011 03 11 062550.30 38.06 144.59 18 7.7 MwUCMT 5FM .......
PDE-W 2011 04 07 143243.29 38.28 141.59 42 7.1 MwWCMT 7CM .......
PDE-W 2011 06 24 030939.47 52.05 -171.84 52 7.3 MwWCMT 6FM .T.....
PDE-W 2011 07 06 190318.26 -29.54 -176.34 17 7.6 MwWCMT 2FM .......
PDE-W 2011 07 10 005710.80 38.03 143.26 23 7.0 MwWCMT 6FM .......
PDE-W 2011 08 20 165502.81 -18.36 168.14 32 7.2 MwWCMT 5FM .......
PDE-W 2011 08 20 181923.55 -18.31 168.22 28 7.1 MwWCMT 5FM .......
PDE-W 2011 08 24 174611.65 -7.64 -74.53 147 7.0 MwWCMT 6FM .......
PDE-W 2011 09 03 225540.92 -20.67 169.72 185 7.0 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-W 2011 09 15 193104.08 -21.61 -179.53 644 7.3 MwWCMT 2FM .......
PDE-W 2011 10 21 175716.10 -28.99 -176.24 33 7.4 MwWCMT 3FM .......
PDE-W 2011 10 23 104122.93 38.72 43.51 16 7.1 MwWCMT 8CM F.....L
PDE-W 2011 12 14 050459.27 -7.56 146.80 140 7.1 MwWCMT 6FM .......
PDE-Q 2012 01 10 183659.08 2.43 93.21 19 7.2 MwWCMT 4FM .......
PDE-Q 2012 02 02 133440.64 -17.83 167.12 23 7.1 MwWCMT 5FM .......

reply to post by stereologist


This is very true. And also why, while I use statistics daily, I'm not convinced of any predictive power that may be conferred by the stats. I may pay attention if I get an R^2=1 over a non-smoothed, non-corrected dataset, but that's about it.

Thank you for your posts; I look forward to more interaction in the future!
Cheers!

reply to post by truthseekr1111


You can go to: earthquake.usgs.gov...

to get a list of the earthquakes by date (and by magnitude if that floats your boat)

and here: www.timeanddate.com...

to do date calcs for the 188 days prior....

if you plugin the values the op uses, you will see that the dates do not match up. plus there a # load of other quakes in between...so this theory is BS. sorry mate.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Frequency of Occurrence of Earthquakes
Magnitude Average Annually
8 and higher 1 ¹
7 - 7.9 15 ¹
6 - 6.9 134 ²
5 - 5.9 1319 ²
4 - 4.9 13,000(estimated)
3 - 3.9 130,000(estimated)
2 - 2.9 1,300,000(estimated)

¹ Based on observations since 1900.
These numbers have been recently updated, based on data from the Centennial catalog (from 1900 to 1999) and the PDE (since 2000).
² Based on observations since 1990.

I did the search for mag 7.9 and greater and while the AVERAGE is around 188 days I found intervals between 16 days and 32 months.

Are quakes not on the 'ley lines' to be excluded? Why?

reply to post by jjinsane1


Great revelation and explanation. I think I like it

I made a 3d model of the earth with the major intersecting points on the map and they do make a pyramid> i want to upload the image but i dont know how. Any help?

Originally posted by lzkaware
I made a 3d model of the earth with the major intersecting points on the map and they do make a pyramid> i want to upload the image but i dont know how. Any help?

Tools -> ATS Uploads -> Select Image File

Then reply with the direct link

Originally posted by truthseekr1111

Originally posted by crankyoldman

Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by AnonymousCitizen

 

From that description it sounds like the facts they use are cherry picked. For example why they point to the Fiji earthquake as being significant when there were a number of earthquakes between that and the Japan one that were just as large or larger. Why do they ignore the 7.6 magnitude earthquake that occurred on July 6, 2011? Or the three 7.0 earthquakes that occurred in Vanuatu between August 20 and September 3?

I am not defending his method, but one explanation could be that the "188 day thing" is one of the causes of large quakes, but not the only cause. There will be quakes, even large ones, outside this pattern.

Yes, he clearly states that he is using the Chile quake as a baseline. Nowhere in the demonstration does he ever say, or suggest, "cherry picking" quakes that fit. He took the baseline of Chile, then added and subtracted 188, either there is a quake of significant proportions or not. I don't understand why one would not actually see that in the text. He is also pointing out, quite accurately, that while there have been many other quakes, those on the 188 mark are well documented, highly publicized, and included many deaths.

THANK YOU OldMan... couldn't have said it better... appreciate the thoughtful response as you're right on the MARK!

Originally posted by crankyoldman
The ley lines themselves are energy lines that run throughout the planet. Think of them as the planet's nervous system that distributes energy throughout.

EXACTLY!!

Originally posted by crankyoldman
Those who instigate such destructive rituals harness that energy at certain points and times to create the effect. The 33rd Parallel ley line is known for its major energy field, and folks have put all manner of ritual killings in place on that energy line, including many via execution in prisons and wars.

Well said again M8! But unfortunately, you and I both know, MOST skeptics and the like, will never accept or even understand the profound depth and significance of what you're talking about!

Originally posted by crankyoldman
As for his conclusion. I would suggest that the events are less about "intelligent design" and more about certain folks having the ability to create the quakes. These are ritual events, and many have pointed out the time periods in which this rituals will take place. The "coverage" each quakes has received and the deaths, add to the confirmation of ritual.

Now this is the ONLY portion of your post that I disagree with... And I'm not sure you realize that what you're suggesting is actually addressed in a deeper context if you read between the LINES so to speak. In other words, your premise eludes these "historic" quakes show this pattern due to human manipulation ie HAARP.

Sort of. It is my sense that The two major tsumami events, and haiti involved explosions designed to trigger quakes. now, it could be that the quakes were to happen no matter what, the explosions were done to enhance. The ritual dates were easily predicted, in fact, haiti and fukashima were well within my own expectations - exact times weren't perfect. Might be a chicken and egg issue. HAARP is involved to a degree, but I would suggest its main purpose is different then standard physical manipulation.

not to say there aren't "folks" trying to create quakes, but the only way thats possible, is if HAARP EXISTED 200 years ago! I think most will agree it didn't and therefore cannot be part of the EQUATION regarding the CYCLE/PATTERN.

Possibly, but there are other forces at work, forces that manipulate from beyond our realm, but that's for another thread.

which raises even more very interesting questions which is what the video is attempting to convey and force people to consider.

Totally agree. We tend to see patterns and make connections that aren't really accurate. We also dismiss connections that are accurate, our programming, also known as education, has put faulty logic, anchored by irrational fear, into our brains which prevents us from investigating - we'd rather debunk or simply shout bs when asked to look. I applaud the video guy for even making the effort and putting out there so internet hobos can take pot shots at him rather then have a look and think about his points.

3d Image I rendered using the main intersecting points on the maps. Chile, DC, Japan, Australia, And the tip is in Africa.




first time uploading an image i hope it works.

reply to post by SilentKoala


thanks for your help. I uploaded the image.