It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sandalphon
The burqa is a religion-related garment. Being Britain with official religions, people in wigs in important places, and people using clothing as a symbol of rank, including crowns, to ban a burqa would be out of the ordinary. What next, no yarmukles for Jewish men? No habits for nuns? No turbans for sikhs? Do you see where it could go?
The woman isn't hiding a bomb in her burqa. It was in her purse, as the post claims. It would be better to ban purses, if people were so stupid to make a law off of one sensational event in Britain.
Who was the fool who called in the bomb threat? And how did he or she know ahead of time? There is the problem.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Openeye
And what right has the right to wear religious clothing that covers the face infringed upon? The right to know what someone looks like? Last time I checked that wasn't a right.
The right to see someone's face when they can see yours.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Openeye
And what right has the right to wear religious clothing that covers the face infringed upon? The right to know what someone looks like? Last time I checked that wasn't a right.
The right to see someone's face when they can see yours.
I must have missed that part of the constitution.
Originally posted by cavtrooper7
Those of us living in the 21st century require identification.
Originally posted by Legion2024
There is only a few places where it should be banned
1) Driving a car.
2) Inside banks
3) License photo, or any photo ID
4) Airports
5) Schools.
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
The religious argument for it is invalid it is not required by Islam & there are other options.
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Two reasons I would be for banning it:
1 If the overwhelming majority are for a ban then aren't the laws supposed to reflect what the majority wants, not a small minority.
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
2 It allows for instances like this,
Carnita Matthews, 47...
...alleged an officer had removed her burqa to confirm her identity after pulling her over while she was driving in Campbelltown
• “Allah akbar, may all the pigs burn in hell inshallah”.
• videos of Osama bin Laden,
• slurs against infidels and “Kufaars” (non-Muslims),
• “American pig savages” and “Zionist dogs”.
• A video also appears with the title “8 US soldiers killed in Iraq” accompanied by the message from Ibrahim: “Keep them Comming (sic)”.
sheikyermami.com...
Originally posted by Danimaltl
Bruqa's are awesome!
Rise in rickets linked to ethnic groups that shun the sun
"Every pregnancy, you use up your vitamin D stores and if you're not making enough to replenish them, you gradually get more and more depleted.
By your third or fourth child, that child is born already without enough vitamin D.
So they'll be presenting with rickets at around 18 months."
www.independent.co.uk...
Originally posted by ollncasino
they cause rickets.
Originally posted by ToneDeaf
Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer wore burkas ?
The system is the problem not the face/scarf ,
get a grip people
Originally posted by ToneDeaf
_______________________
Most European women would rather eat
chocolate than have sex, and your point ?
Should Europe ban sex ?
_______________________
Originally posted by ollncasino
Well most European women would perhaps prefer to eat
chocolate than have sex with you.
Perhaps you shouldn't generalise so much form
your own negative experiences with European women.
Originally posted by Openeye
It doesn't matter where I moved I would still act and dress the way I want to...