It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Just like the ''culturally oppressive'' dresses that women have to wear in the West, covering up their breasts.
What's the difference ?
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by SprocketUK
No, those were 3 separate polls, you can't just add them together and say 5000
Actually, statistically you can average the means of the three polls, which works out as
(62% + 66% + 66%) = 64.5%.
2 out 3 people in the UK support banning the burqa.
Pew Research
Pew Global
YouGov
Three polls of a total sample size of 5,000 people is a very large poll of statistical significance.
Originally posted by SprocketUK
You have to be very careful with such small samples as you can get wildly skewed results depending on the places and times of day you survey people.
The three polls, which are not small except in your imagination, were carried out by two respected professional polling organisations: YouGoc and Pew Research, which being professional polling organisations took steps to ensure the polls were representative.
I can understand why you prefer to believe that your own opinion(one person) as being more representative of what British people think than three polls amounting to the opinions of 5,000 people (psychologically we all tend to place a lot of emphasis on our own opinions) but you surely can't expect anyone else to agree with you?
2 out 3 people in the UK support banning the burqa.
Originally posted by SprocketUK
What a pompous, condescending bigot you are. Keep your thread, I see no point arguing with you since you lack a basic understanding of statistics, fairness or any other worthy trait.
Originally posted by SprocketUK
It's obvious that you aren't prepared to let anything sway your outlook from its present "phobic" tracks.
Originally posted by SprocketUK
Life is too short to spend time with people who get on your nerves so I'm outta this. My last comment on this subject is simply Don't be putting your own prejudice and fear on the rest of us, you live with it if you want, but leave us normal Britons out of your twisted little utopia.
Originally posted by purplemer
I would like to ban the thick and stupid people from the Uk. The racist ones that support the removal of the burqa.. There have now been numerous scientific studies done that show people with racist inclinations have a lower IQ score.. I would also like to see people with a low IQ score removed from ATS
Originally posted by purplemer
I would like to ban the thick and stupid people from the Uk. The racist ones that support the removal of the burqa..
It could be observed that it is breath takingly arrogant to describe the 2 out of 3 British people who support the banning as "thick and stupid" and "racist
Are you, in your spasm of politcal correctness suggesting that Syria and the Muslim Canadian Congress are 'thick', 'stupid' and 'racist'?
Originally posted by purplemer
Arrogant maybe, but also truthful, most people are stupid we both know this to be true. That is why I would propose kicking all the stupid people out of the UK.
You want to ban people from wearing a cloth over there face. I would rather ban stupid people. May I ask who would be left with a better society..You with your culturally diffused society or me with my society of high thinkers...
If you can't see the difference between a women covering her breasts and a women covering her face and body in a burqa, then I can only assume you are either blind or a Wahhabi Muslim.
Yet, you have shown no evidence of this superiority. Are you comfortable calling 66% of British people, 59% of Spanish, 82% of French, 71% of Germans, Syria and the Muslim Canadian Congress 'thick', 'stupid' and 'racist'
There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy. The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults.
These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
Originally posted by purplemer
Yet, you have shown no evidence of this superiority. Are you comfortable calling 66% of British people, 59% of Spanish, 82% of French, 71% of Germans, Syria and the Muslim Canadian Congress 'thick', 'stupid' and 'racist'
The sad thing is I do have the evidence to back it up.....
There have been scientific studies done that suggest that stupid people are racists..
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by purplemer
Yet, you have shown no evidence of this superiority. Are you comfortable calling 66% of British people, 59% of Spanish, 82% of French, 71% of Germans, Syria and the Muslim Canadian Congress 'thick', 'stupid' and 'racist'
The sad thing is I do have the evidence to back it up.....
The really sad thing is that you are calling the Muslim Canadian Congress thick', 'stupid' and 'racist' against Muslims.
Work that one out.
It couldn't maybe just be that you are wrong?
Egypt bans women university teachers from wearing burqas
english.ruvr.ru...
I suppose Egypt is full of people who are thick', 'stupid' and 'racist' against Muslims as well?
edit on 18-3-2012 by ollncasino because: grammaredit on 18-3-2012 by ollncasino because: correct error
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by ollncasino
You asked for evidence and I supplied it...I have heard your opinion. Any chance of backing it up with some real evidence...
Originally posted by 23432
Banning a piece of cloth for security reasons ?
No .
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
reply to post by Morgenstern89
I'm no fan of all the post 9/11 fear mongering either, but surely you must understand that the criticisms of the culture can't all stem from hate, ignorance, or bigoted religious views.
But is about hate and the rest. No one criticizes another culture while their government is killing them out of good will.
For example during the Vietnam war if someone from the West, especially the US, came forward criticizing Vietnamese culture, it would be fair to accuse them of being a hate monger. It does not matter even if there is some justification because it is adding insult to injury.
On 9/11 when 3000 Americans died, it would have been unacceptable to hark on about American racism, drug taking and rapes, etc. as fundamental elements of American culture and use it as justifications for the 9/11 atrocity.
Criticizing another religion and culture of far off countries is an irrational preoccupation and it constitutes fighting talk. When the Afghan take their revenge on American soldiers who kill their people, please remember what you have written. You contributed to the conflict.
edit on 17-3-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)