It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Appears to be an ETS (episodic tremor and slip) event in NW Oregon. Started a couple of days ago under Portland and has been slowly moving updip and to the southwest. Ken Creager estimates it has accumulated 52 hours of slip so far. Aaron Wech notes that the last slip event here was about 21 months ago, and that Brudzinski & Allen found events in that area recurred at 19 months +/- 3 months. So ... it's about time!
For ETS recurrence, the accreted terranes composing the upper plate above ETS generate inherently sizable along-strike variations in structure, composition, and age that are presumably more significant than long-term effects of ETS on upper plate structure. This supports an interpretation where variations in the Wrangellia, Siletzia, and Klamath blocks control behavior of the ETS source zone. A clue to how continental blocks could be responsible for differences in ETS recurrence is geochemical evidence that the different terranes have different fluid content (Schmidt and Grunder, 2006), which could trigger ETS via high pore fluid pressures (Kodaira et al., 2004; Obara, 2002). An intriguing hypothesis is that different terrane composition affects the rheology of the upper plate and hence the plate interface (Kohlstedt et al., 1995). For example, the Siletzia terrane represents denser, stronger, more oceanic crust, while the Klamath terrane represents lighter, weaker, more continental crust. Such a scenario would suggest that the low-lying Siletzia region has a longer recurrence interval because the upper plate has the strength to accumulate strain for longer periods between slow slip episodes.
It seems likely that there is a very predictable pattern to the tremor and slip patterns. As time goes on, this web site will try to point out the latest patterns in tremor, earthquakes and slip (when available). If there is a radical departure from the pattern then this might be one signal of a forthcoming megaquake.
Originally posted by Olivine
Time for a tremor update. All of the map data is from the PNSN interactive tremor map.
This map is the past 4 days since my last map post:
And this is the map showing this most recent episode over time:
As you can see, the burst of tremor just south of Portland, Oregon has moved south and west over time. The western (up-dip) movement is important during tremor episodes; I'll come back to that.
It's also interesting that Vancouver Island and central Washington have become active again, considering those areas had their longest recorded episode ever, back in the fall 2012.
The 3 yellow lines on the maps indicate the depth of the plate interface (20, 30, & 40 kms--moving west to east) as the Juan de Fuca oceanic plate gets shoved under the North American plate.
The central Oregon burst began fairly deep, around 45 kms down-dip, and has moved up-dip to approximately 25 kms.
Here is an illustrated cross-section of the fault:
source
After observing repeated ETS events, the geoscientists have concluded that the lower limit of the transition zone is at about 25 kms depth. Their modeling shows the plate interface to be 100% locked up-dip, near 10 km depth. Then the coupling (locked-tight-ness ) drops to only 50% at 25 kms deep. From 25 to 40 kms (the depth of the majority of tremor and slow-slip), the coupling drops rapidly from 50% to only 15%; and below 70 kms the slab is freely slipping into the mantle. (I've paraphrased this info from here.)
Now, the website WillowWisp linked a few posts above, written by W.D. Stanley, of USGS (formerly?) (who published on ETS in 1999), hypothesizes that the central Oregon block (Siletzia terrane) is the main sticking point for the entire fault line. He reasons that because the area is primarily composed of denser, stronger mafic rock, as opposed to the northern and southern ends of the CSZ, the asperities at the plate interface, in this area, are tougher to break.
When a critical percentage of these sticking points crumble, that is when a major earthquake will happen.
He also proposes the following:
It seems likely that there is a very predictable pattern to the tremor and slip patterns. As time goes on, this web site will try to point out the latest patterns in tremor, earthquakes and slip (when available). If there is a radical departure from the pattern then this might be one signal of a forthcoming megaquake.
Let me put this together:
1. During an ETS event, the stress applied to the "locked zone" is increased, because the interface down-dip is "unlocked" for a short time, allowing the full weight of the down-going slab to "pull" on the locked zone.
2. The 25 kms depth on the interface seems to be the westward, up-dip limit of tremor and slip.
3. If there is strong deviation from "normal" ETS patterns, it could signal the megathrust EQ is near.
So, we should try to establish what the "normal" ETS patterns are, and be on the lookout for radical departures from said patterns. Easy
(If I have misunderstood any of this, or just have it flat out wrong--please set me straight!)
Same area, different topic. I find this small quake interesting. Mag 2.1 Check out the depth--87.4 kilometers?
Ack! I can never get a post right on the first try. Or second.
The current tremor west of Salem and Eugene, Oregon is ongoing. Realtime tremor It is also still moving up-dip, into the transition zone.
Also, I'm not sure why I've never "clicked" the chart option on the interactive tremor map before, but it is fun!
(well, I'm a geek and easily amused)
This is a screencap of one option.
You can set it to show latitude or longitude movement, hours of tremor, # of discrete epicenters, etc, and you can play it as a movie. Check it out.edit on 3/12/2013 by Olivine because: addingedit on 3/12/2013 by Olivine because: (no reason given)edit on 3/12/2013 by Olivine because: more mistakesedit on 3/12/2013 by Olivine because: do you ever just have "one of those days"?
There are suggestions that the tremor activity is too synchronous along Cascadia and elsewhere to be coincidental, but there is no plausible way to link activity. So we await either someone showing the synchronicity is consistent with randomness (the likely outcome) or a connection is demonstrated and explained.
This same area had little swarms in 2008 and 2011, never getting an event as big as M3, who knows why. Our stations are far enough away that we cannot confidently measure the earthquake depth.