It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Danbones
the bodies buried under the buildings indicate at least a few generations of ownership, and maybe even ancestor worship too
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by Biliverdin
Yet the practice was wide spread leading (probably) to the Asian modern practice of ancestor worship.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by Biliverdin
I was agreeing with you and adding a note !
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by Danbones
the bodies buried under the buildings indicate at least a few generations of ownership, and maybe even ancestor worship too
I'm not a big fan of the term 'Ancestor Worship'. You mourn the loss of something that is valuable to you, barely notice the passing of something that was commonplace. I think therefore that it is more indicative of the growth of the awareness that some humans were more valuable, because they 'gave' and what they 'gave' was lost upon death. Ancestor Worship therefore, to me, is more indicative of the growth of the awareness that knowledge (and skill) was a communicable, and prized, commodity. But that is purely my opinion. Eventually it would have become a matter of worship, but that is the way of all things the further we remove ourselves from the original source of practice and transform it into belief.
And, burial within the home can be seen as utilitarian, where ground was not suitable for a deep burial, or it would require taking unnecessary risk to transport the bodies to a burial site, it was safer to keep the dead within the confines of the settlement, where they would not attract predators and scavengers. Again, what was once a necessity, will under certain circumstances, become a habit. Either way, it is a highly unhealthy practice, and can perhaps be seen as contributory to why these settlements, where such burials were practiced, had to eventually be abandoned....thus preserving them for our study.
Ancestor worship occurs in ancient cultures all over the world, and even in modern times it plays an important role in primitive religions. It is founded on the belief that the dead live on and are able to influence the lives of later generations. These ancestors can assert their powers by blessing or cursing, and their worship is inspired by both respect and fear. The ancestor cult consists of praying, presenting gifts, and making offerings. In some cultures, people try to get their ancestors' advice through oracles before making important decisions.
In ancient China and Egypt, the influence of ancestors was very great.
They were buried in expensive graves and in Egypt a permanent death cult was instituted. It was generally believed that the lack of veneration would cause the deceased to die a second death, which was for many people an almost unbearable thought.
In nearly every primitive tribal religions of Africa ancestor worship is common practice. The ancestors of the tribe are honored as spirits who preserve the moral standards of tribal life. They are also regarded as the intermediaries between the living and the divine powers. And the ancestor spirits play an important role in the initiation rites. Among some west-African peoples the belief is current that the ancestors reincarnate in their descendants.
In Japan, ancestors were worshipped until 1945. At that time, the Japanese Emperor disclaimed any form of divine ancestry and polytheistic ancestor worship was no longer permitted.
In 1997, a fifth mtDNA haplogroup was identified in Native Americans, This group, called ‘"X," is present in three percent of living Native Americans. Haplogroup X was not then found in Asia, but was found only in Europe and the Middle East
www.ocf.berkeley.edu...
The floor of rooms other than the kiva would generally be plastered rather than covered with stone slabs. The interior of the walls would be plastered as well, and frequently painted with designs.....
By 1000 C.E., the Anasazi had advanced to stone construction...
...In addition to the above-ground rooms, a site would have one or more kivas, underground chambers, which are assumed, by parallel with kivas in modern pueblos, to be of ritual use. The kiva would be a circular pit, with walls of the same construction as the above ground rooms, extending a short distance above ground. The floor would be paved in stone slabs, and entrance would be through the roof. The area directly around the entrance would frequently be finished in stone as well, possibly to reduce the amount of wear on the entrance. There would be a hearth inside, with an altar on the other side of the hearth facing the wall. The wall nearest the hearth would have a ventilation opening near the bottom. With an opening at the ground and in the roof, the fire would set up air currents which would provide good ventilation. There would be a bench running around the perimeter of the kiva
Originally posted by Kantzveldt
I made digital reconstruction of the premise for these patterns....
Frustratingly, there has been no furthur information about this site for several years now, no photographs of the overall site which includes cyclopean walls, as mentioned in the funding request
Originally posted by Kantzveldt
reply to post by Hanslune
Question is why didn't it continue to look nice and maybe a whole lot nicer through subsequent generations, why did these carefully contrived and executed patterns degenerate into the various scribbled squiggles, zany zigzags and lazy lozenges haphazardly seen on bone, stone and figurine through the subsequent millenia of the Neolithic period...the same that could be said of the fine constructions at Nevali Cori and Gobekli Tepe...the early Neolithic was the 'nicest'.