9/11 for Dummies: A Closer Look At Motive

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


If it was that simple, than the question on inside trading would be answered and we would all believe in terrorists. But apparently that wasn't the case. Someone else had inside information.

Originally posted by badconduct
reply to post by TrickoftheShade

 

If it was that simple, than the question on inside trading would be answered and we would all believe in terrorists. But apparently that wasn't the case. Someone else had inside information.

So you're saying that the evidence for conspiracy is that some people believe it? Sorry, I don't find that at all persuasive.

And I'm not saying it's simple. Just that Arabs can trade shares. Which isn't really up for debate.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


If it's foolish to believe that there are no Arabs that can trade, than it's foolish to think there are no Arabs that work for the Government. It's also kinda foolish to assume only Arabs are involved with 9/11.

I think just looking at the timeline of events post 9/11 shows there is a great conspiracy or agenda by a group of very, very powerful people.

We have the year 2000 document 'Rebuilding America's Defences' which is highlting countries of interest for American foreign policy - Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran.

Our governments are ticking these countries off at alarming speed- Iraq, Afghan, Libya all done, Syria seemingly next on the agenda as it's on the news along with Iran. It's literally non stop moving from one country to the next- all part of a machine that is helped along by the main stream media's propaganda efforts.

We have a government that will bomb Libya back to the stone ages based on a very little (well no evidence) and yet we sit by whilst the worst violence is being carried out in Egypt.

That alone shows the evil in power.

Evidence suggests Libya was a stable country (debt free, high literacy- Gaddafi had improved the country a lot over his 40 years)- over 1/3 of the entire population of Libya marched in SUPPORT of Gaddaffi, there was no evidence at all of Police killing innocent civilians- the evidence, some of which went mainstream shows there were foreign terrorists inside the country killing police and civiliand in order to create destability.

Yet we bombed Libya to protect the people on 'humanitarian' grounds.

All this, whilst there is 100% evidence the people of Egypt are victims of incredible police/army brutality. Yet the West sits back and leaves them to it. Double standards of epic proportions. But when you realise USA funded the tyrant regime of Egypt for their advantage for 30 years- then we see that the true powers that be do not really care for human life.

Once you can accept this, then seeing that 9/11 was an inside job becomes a lot easier.

Norad never responded to hijacked planes- not even after the first plane hit, they never responded.

Silverstein was at the doctors on the day of 9/11.

The hijackers passport was found in the rubble- despite everything else turning literally to dust.

Buildings fell at close to free fall speed. You don't need to be an engineer to know this was demolition- if it collapses half way up, the bottom half is still solid- so it wouldn't collapse downward with no resistance.

Bin Laden was plugged as the perpetrator on Fox news within an hour of the planes hitting.

BBC reported building 7 had fell before it had. You can't make excuses for reporting the future- no angle of mistake can explain this other than an early press release.

Bush's unbelievable lies post 9/11- he can't even remember which story he told half the time.

The profit groups have made since 9/11- contracts for weapons, oil contracts- we've already got contracts in Libya.

It's so obvious once you just step back and look at the overall picture.

Originally posted by badconduct
reply to post by TrickoftheShade

 

If it's foolish to believe that there are no Arabs that can trade, than it's foolish to think there are no Arabs that work for the Government. It's also kinda foolish to assume only Arabs are involved with 9/11.

They are not of the same magnitude at all. It is axiomatically true that arabic people trade equities. Indeed it's so obviously true that it's hardly worth discussing. And of course arabic people work for the US government. But the last thing - you've shown nothing to evidence that in any way. Except some vague and baseless bigotry about non-westerners' financial capabilities.