It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
ROMNEY WINS michgan
ROMNEY wins!!
cnn projected winner ROMNEY for MI
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by popsmayhem
ROMNEY WINS michgan
ROMNEY wins!!
cnn projected winner ROMNEY for MI
Yep...but he may not win the majority of the delegates...right now Santorum is leading in more congressional districts.
ROMNEY WINS michgan ROMNEY wins!! cnn projected winner ROMNEY for MI
Efforts to regulate derivatives were thwarted by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, backed by several key officials. In the 2000s, the industry was dominated by five investment banks (Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Bear Stearns), two financial conglomerates (Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase), three securitized insurance companies (AIG, MBIA, AMBAC) and three rating agencies (Moody’s, Standard & Poors, Fitch)
And Romney "winning" MI is a good thing?
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by popsmayhem
ROMNEY WINS michgan ROMNEY wins!! cnn projected winner ROMNEY for MI
So you are aware that Romneys top donors are all bankers? That his top supporter is Government Sachs?
You are aware that if elected, Romney would follow the same fiscal policies because that's what the banks want right? You are aware that as shi**y as the country has been Romney would only continue the status quo?
And Romney "winning" MI is a good thing?
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by coyotepoet
And Romney "winning" MI is a good thing?
It's not that him winning is a good thing, but this win was set in stone. It would of been too dramatic if he would of lost his home state...This primary was the showcase for Romney and Santorum...
It's not that him winning is a good thing, but this win was set in stone. It would of been too dramatic if he would of lost his home state...This primary was the showcase for Romney and Santorum...
case in point.
There are no "free" elections anymore.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Ron Paul projected to do very well in Washington state 3/3 ....the last primary event before Super Tuesday.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Ron Paul projected to do very well in Washington state 3/3 ....the last primary event before Super Tuesday.
I don't see much polling from Washington state, but the latest polling from the 21st, I see has Paul running third.
www.publicpolicypolling.com...
Santorum: 38%
Romney: 27%
Paul: 15%
Gingrich: 12%
I would assume Romney gets a boost out of tonights wins, Santorum has been dropping from his crazy talk lately and tonights loses won't do him any good.
Is there a reason you think Ron Paul will bump up in support?
Wrong. Ron Paul wants to end NAFTA and CAFTA. Ever heard of the Texas Super Highway? Google it.
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by MrSpad
But, you can not expect most college kids to bother looking to much into politics they do not even bother to vote.
Well that's what i find strange, supposedly Ron Paul is a huge hit on college campuses. I find it hard to believe that most of them aren't on some kind of financial aid, grant, or loan.
Or that the guy wants to sell our national parks and shut down the Department of the Interior. Maybe Disney would buy Yellow Stone and make it into an amusement park.
And not only that, Ron Paul would put free trade on steroids, making it even more difficult to compete with slave labor.
Just because the guy wants to minimize government does not mean it's good for the country. It seems people get too caught up in the "liberty" rhetoric.
Paul is nearly as extreme as Santorum...just in a different way.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by jjf3rd77
You can't come out against contraceptives and expect to win, and you can't say that woman who become pregnant due to rape shouldn't be allowed abortions. Ironic that his wife had an abortion before she married him, I wonder how he lives "knowing" he will go to heaven and his wife to hell. I mean that's what he believes right?
He is a nut job for sure.
Ah...You are attacking Santorum on Far Right issues? Just take a look at your buddy's quotes:
..It's academic to talk about civil liberties if you don't talk about the true protection of all life. So if you're going to protect liberty, you have to protect the life of the unborn just as well. I have a bill in Congress ["Sanctity of Life Act of 2007"] which I certainly would promote and push as president...and what it would do is establish the principle that life begins at conception."
Exactly the same as Santorum on Church and State:
The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. On the contrary, our Founders’ political views were strongly informed by their religious beliefs.
He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother's life.
So you see your man is just as crazy as Santorum is and Santorum is doing better in the polls. Methinks your jealous!
edit on 28-2-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
HOW.. PLEASE TELL A SIMPLE CANADIAN... HOW HOW HOW is Santorum in the lead in these States?
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by popsmayhem
ROMNEY WINS michgan ROMNEY wins!! cnn projected winner ROMNEY for MI
So you are aware that Romneys top donors are all bankers? That his top supporter is Government Sachs?
Well gee. his is a conservative, Republican, generational politician, Ex Corporate raider and insanely wealthy. I am shocked