WikiLeaks begins publishing 5 million emails from STRATFOR

reply to post by Realtruth


Could you cut and paste a little?

Not a lawyer but have seen people go to prison for being around when someone offed someone else!

It looks to me like someone is having a laugh at the expense of STRATFOR; possibly the same people who put together and distributed that fake Friedman resignation e-mail.

Some of these 'emails' are really quite funny, but it appears that a lot of you are taking them seriously. If reading that glossary doesn't raise eyebrows then you really can't be helped.

reply to post by ajay59


Wonder if being under a corporate umbrella protects them, I guess.

reply to post by TKDRL


This is the message I get trying to follow your link

LOL, looks like I am in no way shape or form going to be able to view that information!!

reply to post by Soshh


I am under the thinking that there might be some fraudulent info coming at us also, but 5 million emails? Don't think it's all fake.

Still waiting, of course,

Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by ajay59

 

Wonder if being under a corporate umbrella protects them, I guess.

That's the problem with large corporations, who is ever held accountable?

Classic example: Wall Street.

Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by Realtruth

 

Could you cut and paste a little?

theres some on like page 5 of this thread

reply to post by SunnyDee



Capital crime is capital crime. If you willingly with hold info that makes you an accomplice!

Originally posted by Highground
reply to post by TKDRL

 

Wikileaks/Anonymous commits illegal acts to get the truth, and it's okay. STRATFOR potentially commits illegal acts to get the truth, and they're evil.

Just interesting to me.

I think the difference is privatized truth vs. open truth.

Wikileaks is releasing the information to the public, Stratfor was going to open up a trading firm that used legal loopholes to profit off inside information.



I don't really want to argue the morality of it all, but I wouldn't act as though the people caught in the loop are innocent either. The focus on banks, firms like this, government is the same focus that has been used to ostracize and alienate regular people for many years.

reply to post by TheGuyFawkes


Yes, I saw that list. I didn't see any of the bigger american media in that list. Are there any of those?

Sorry for the short post.

reply to post by MyMindIsMyOwn


We are sorry,

Site is undergoing a maintenance, please try again later.

I am pretty sure the link will work after the mainenance lol.

Here is a link to grab it. It is an xls document, openoffice opens it up, I think microsoft excel will too.

Originally posted by MyMindIsMyOwn
reply to post by TKDRL

 

This is the message I get trying to follow your link

LOL, looks like I am in no way shape or form going to be able to view that information!!

Try this one instead. Click around till you find it.

it's like saying a child molester is in his right of liberty if he gets off on a technicality. Even if he paid the judge, jury and all involved to create the technicality.

To defend this is wrong and makes everyone suspect. I would really reconsider damage control, it only encourages the opponent in this situation. Which is the general public.

No one in their right mind will have a problem with this. Unless they have vested interests. I am not saying people are shills for doing so, but what rational person says it is ok to let a child molester free due to technicalities.

If it happens people lose trust in the system. If you defend this you lose the trust of your peers.

wrong, ok,

what is the greater wrong. Killing people is wrong, yet we go to war to kill the Hitlers of the world do we not.

It is wrong to steal, yet we confiscate criminal funds.

It is wrong to hold someone against their will, yet we put people in prison.

It is wrong to threaten the freedom and safety of my people, so we steal emails and expose fraud.

This is why one must follow the spririt of the law, and not the literal words of it.
They are just a guide, but when they are corrupted and twisted, the guide is always the spirit.

I am sorry, this is a good thing. It had to happen. They have not left the unavoidable truth any other option.

I have not had the time to watch or read the MSM. Has there been any mention of this?

Edit: I was going to say it was breaking that anonymous is claiming to have forged e-mails but that may just be old news repeated, I'll wait for confirmation either way

reply to post by Soshh


yes i would agree some of them are quite funny and they are just conversational banter between individuals who seem to work for an intelligence gathering agency....but when on looks at the names...the sender and the reciever and the dates and put them together with issues being discussed....it seems to fit into a chronological timeline.....so what i am gathering from you is...hoax......or am i wrong there.

reply to post by SunnyDee


nah its just a bunch of terms they use and the meanings of the terms

i am DL the file on the wikileaks main page and it seems many of the individual files in the 149gb of file there is a great amount of viral infections......hit 17 or so so far......so if your going to download the file make sure your checking it.

reply to post by Xieon


That is the biggest problem I have with these kinds of links. I try my best to verify info, it's in my nature. There is no way for me to vefiry anything, it frustrates me to no end.