It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“These regulations don’t make sense environmentally or economically,” said National Petrochemical and Refiners Association President Charles Drevna. “The proposal would increase greenhouse gas emissions, hurt American consumers by adding billions of dollars to the cost of manufacturing gasoline, hurt communities and workers by threatening to put some fuel manufacturing plants out of business, and weaken America’s economic and national security.”
According to the study, implementing a nationwide (save for California) summer season 7 pounds per square inch (psia) RVP specification and sulfur limits of 20 ppm per gallon cap and 10 ppm per company annual average would remove a large quantity of natural gas liquids (NGLs) from gasoline. The modeling indicates that US domestic gasoline production would decrease by 1,157 thousand bpd during the summer, which is equivalent to 14% of projected summer 2016 hydrocarbon gasoline consumption. Under this scenario, summer gasoline imports would need to increase by 125%. However, the volume of gasoline with lower sulfur and lower RVP that would be available from foreign refineries is not clear. Regardless, regulations that close US refineries or lead to reduced output will make the US that much more vulnerable to supply disruptions, as more refined product will have to be obtained from overseas.
Domestic refinery investment costs for implementing the lower sulfur and lower RVP standards could range from $10–$17 billion. The study’s authors predict that if such standards are implemented, the US could see the closure of four to seven refineries. These refineries would make the decision to close rather than make the required investments to be compliant. Total compliance costs for the US domestic refining industry would be in the range of $5–$13 billion.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by jdub297
Tensions with Iran - in other words, speculation that supply will be cut (we don't actually buy oil from Iran, but other countries do). This hasn't affected our supplies at all, and as repeatedly pointed out, our supplies are at an all time high.
The Dodd-Frank Financial Reform bill, signed into law on July 21, 2010, mandated that the CFTC write rules for the oil markets designed to stop speculation from controlling prices on crude oil and gasoline and driving them to astronomical levels, as they did in 2008. The bill also demanded that these rules be in place and working by February of this year.
There's just one problem: Those rules haven't yet been written and approved.
They haven't been written largely because of the pushback that the CFTC has received from the traders that make massive profits from the financial oil markets and the advocacy groups and lawyers that represent them. As the CFTC has proposed new rules, they've been met by a who's who of derivative traders and their advocates arguing for the status quo and urging caution, including PIMCO, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, the Futures Industry Association (FIA) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) -- to name only a few. The lawyers arguing their case are predictably the best, brightest and most expensive in Washington, including attorneys from Alston & Bird, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Patton Boggs, Sullivan, Cromwell and Skadden, Arps.
Under this pressure, the CFTC has buckled and thrown in the towel on much of the needed rulemaking, at least for now. To take one example, the Commission has given up trying to craft a rule on position limits in oil derivatives until at least 2012, and position limits is only one of thirty complex rulemaking areas the CFTC has acknowledged it must tackle before its mandate is complete.
The Oil Speculators(IE big banks) and the oil industry also want the pipeline from Canada that Obama has blocked and this is a way for them to put pressure on the administration to get it approved
The big banks in the US also do a lot of business in Canada and would make a lot of money from loans for the pipeline plus new money in there banks from the pipeline after its built.
(Key Facts on Keystone XL)
- By draining Midwestern refineries of cheap Canadian crude into export-oriented refineries in the Gulf Coast, Keystone XL will increase the cost of gas for Americans.
- TransCanada’s 2008 Permit Application states “Existing markets for Canadian heavy crude, principally PADD II [U.S. Midwest], are currently oversupplied, resulting in price discounting for Canadian heavy crude oil. Access to the USGC [U.S. Gulf Coast] via the Keystone XL Pipeline is expected to strengthen Canadian crude oil pricing in [the Midwest] by removing this oversupply. This is expected to increase the price of heavy crude to the equivalent cost of imported crude. The resultant increase in the price of heavy crude is estimated to provide an increase in annual revenue to the Canadian producing industry in 2013 of US $2 billion to US $3.9 billion.”
- Independent analysis of these figures found this would increase per-gallon prices by 20 cents/gallon in the Midwest.
- According to an independent analysis U.S. farmers, who spent $12.4 billion on fuel in 2009 could see expenses rise to $15 billion or higher in 2012 or 2013 if the pipeline goes through. At least $500 million of the added expense would come from the Canadian market manipulation.
One of the most important facts that is missing in the national debate surrounding the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline is this – Keystone XL will not bring any more oil into the United State for decades to come. Canada doesn’t have nearly enough oil to fill existing pipelines going to the United States. However, existing Canadian oil pipelines all go to the Midwest, where the only buyer for their crude is the United States. Keystone XL would divert Canadian oil from refineries in the Midwest to the Gulf Coast where it can be refined and exported. Many of these refineries are in Foriegn Trade Zones where oil may be exported to international buyers without paying U.S. taxes. And that is exactly what Valero, one of the largest potential buyers of Keystone XL's oil, has told its investors it will do. The idea that Keystone XL will improve U.S. oil supply is a documented scam being played on the American people by Big Oil and its friends in Washington DC.
The study examines the potential costs of the EPA’s “Tier 3” fuel standard for gasoline blends, which could be proposed at the end of the year. It determined that the new requirements could boost the cost of making gasoline by up to 25 cents per gallon and could shutter up to seven US refineries.
Originally posted by jdub297
...tell the whole story.
The truth is simple market forces: supply v. demand.
...
...tell the truth.
(edit: mine)
As the NPR broadcast states, oil production is up higher than ever, and use is lower. They state "US energy policy is not to blame".
What is to blame is the unregulatedspeculators(corporate interests, lobbyist’s, politicians) that are using any opportunity - like fear over Iran - to gouge prices.
Originally posted by spirit_horse
One thing that is also causing higher prices is that many US refineries are shut down right now to set the refineries up for new blending regulations that the EPA has made them do by spring 2012.
New requirements could raise cost of gas, shutter US refineries
edit on 26/2/12 by spirit_horse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ANNED
The Oil Speculators(IE big banks) and the oil industry also want the pipeline from Canada that Obama has blocked and this is a way for them to put pressure on the administration to get it approved
Originally posted by type0civ
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Economics is such a tricky subject and difficult to comprehend. My view is that MANIPULATION of the free markets by our so called govt and corp leaders gouges us.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the most galling part for me is ...
...a joke of course, because they own congress
Originally posted by XXX777
The price of these commodities would be very low and very steady if market forces were at work in the usual way that people imagine market forces work.
The fact is that the derivative market controls the price. The derivative market was created as a control mechanism. If you don't understand it, study it. The price is manipulated not by 'speculators' but by the manipulators.
This idea that Joe Sixpack at home with a computer and a futures trading account moves the market is total bullcrap. The market is manipulated by a manipulator far bigger than all the at home players combined.
Blame Oil Speculators, Not Obama, For Rising Oil Prices
The speculators serve no purpose other than drive the cost of oil higher than it would be without them so... you can be certain the big oil has no problem with their existence in the market.
What's indisputable is that oil and gasoline are not in short supply, and that demand is weak. That was clear in the latest weekly energy market update by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) — for the week ending Feb. 10.
Originally posted by SkyMuerte
You can no more blame just Obama, or just Speculators, or just Bush, or just Goldman Sachs, or just Anyone Else for this mess anymore than you can blame a single cancer cell for killing you.
The mess is systemic. The patient is dying and all the doctors are out golfing.......