It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There’s little truth to claims that Obama has curbed U.S. oil production and driven up gas prices in the process. As NPR noted this morning, the number of drilling rigs in U.S. oil fields has quadrupled under Obama and domestic oil production hit an 8-year high in 2011. For the first time in 60 years, the U.S. is now a net fuel exporter.
Oil demand was actually down 4.6 percent last week over last year, while the supply of gasoline has actually increased slightly since a year ago. So why are gas prices so high? As McClatchy’s Kevin Hall explains today, there is a systemic problem: speculation.
But the numbers tell a different story - the number of drilling rigs in US oil fields has quadrupaled since Mr. Obama's been in office, and last year they pumped the most oil in 8 years.
What ‘War On American Energy’? U.S. On Track To Be Net Fuel Exporter For First Time Since 1949
WASHINGTON — When oil prices hit a record $147 a barrel in July 2008, the Bush administration leaned on Saudi Arabia to pump more crude in hopes that a flood of new crude would drive the price down. The Saudis complied, but not before warning that oil already was plentiful and that Wall Street speculation, not a shortage of oil, was driving up prices.
"Approximately 60 to 70 percent of the oil contracts in the futures markets are now held by speculative entities. Not by companies that need oil, not by the airlines, not by the oil companies. But by investors that are looking to make money from their speculative positions," Gilligan explained.
Gilligan said these investors don't actually take delivery of the oil. "All they do is buy the paper, and hope that they can sell it for more than they paid for it. Before they have to take delivery."
"They're trying to make money on the market for oil?" Kroft asked.
"Absolutely," Gilligan replied. "On the volatility that exists in the market. They make it going up and down."
Ten years ago, speculators only controlled about 30 percent of the oil futures market. Today, Wall Street speculators control more than 80 percent of this market, even though many of them will never use a drop of this oil. Their only function in this process is to make as much money as they can, as quickly as they can.
JPMorgan, which has never hired an oil tanker based on data compiled by Bloomberg going back five years, follows companies including Citigroup Inc.’s Phibro LLC unit and BP Plc in hiring ships to store crude or oil products at sea. The firms are seeking to take advantage of higher prices later in the year.
“It’s opportunity-driven,” Sverre Bjorn Svenning, an analyst at Fearnley Consultants AS in Oslo, said by phone. “I doubt it’s going to be a permanent or new sort of trade.”
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
American refineries produce gas cheaper than others, far cheaper.
Others are paying higher prices for foreign gasoline.
(Recall Energy Secretary Chu's observation that Americans should be paying "European prices" for gasoline.)
Since the Europeans (and others) can buy our gas for less than they currently pay, they are now buying more if our gas.
Since there is a limited supply, they bid the price up.
Simple, really.
You weren'tlistening, or you don't want to tell the truth.
jwedit on 26-2-2012 by jdub297 because: w
Gas prices are on the rise and there's a slew of possible reasons as to why. Tensions with Iran, the Obama administration's policies, and Wall Street speculators have all been cited as factors. But it still doesn't answer why prices are increasing while U.S. demand for gasoline is going down. Weekends on All Things Considered host Guy Raz talks with NPR's John Ydstie about some hidden factors behind the jacked up gas prices.
I would say this is false.. Obama has been warmongering everywhere possible which has had a direct impact on oil..
He is an even bigger warmonger than both Bushes were..
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by jdub297
As the NPR broadcast states, oil production is up higher than ever, and use is lower. They state "US energy policy is not to blame".
What is to blame is the unregulated speculators that are using any opportunity - like fear over Iran - to gouge prices.
Gas prices are on the rise and there's a slew of possible reasons as to why. Tensions with Iran, the Obama administration's policies, and Wall Street speculators have all been cited as factors. But it still doesn't answer why prices are increasing while U.S. demand for gasoline is going down.
Financial speculators historically accounted for about 30 percent of oil trading in commodity markets; producers and end users made up about 70 percent. Today, it's almost the reverse.
A review of data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates oil trading, shows producers and merchants made up 36 percent and speculators 64 percent of all contracts traded in the week ending Feb. 14.
Not surprisingly, big Wall Street traders Tuesday projected oil will exceed $112 a barrel; some, such as Swiss giant Vitol, even suggested $150-a-barrel oil is coming. When they dominate the market, speculators' bids can make their prophecies self-fulfilling.
Oh I am loving the irony.
I can imagine the foaming mouths, the pitchforks and cries of hatred when gas spiked and Bush was POTUS.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by jdub297
Gas prices are on the rise and there's a slew of possible reasons as to why. Tensions with Iran, the Obama administration's policies, and Wall Street speculators have all been cited as factors. But it still doesn't answer why prices are increasing while U.S. demand for gasoline is going down.
A new study says that upcoming US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements could raise the cost of manufacturing gasoline, lead to the closing of domestic refineries, and force the US to double its gasoline imports while causing increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Baker and O’Brien executed the study on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute (API).
“The new EPA requirements could be devastating to consumers and communities across the nation,” said Bob Greco, API’s group director of downstream operations. “Consumers would be hurt by the increased cost of fuel projected by the study, and the closing of refineries could put local economies at risk, meaning there would be fewer jobs. In addition, we would be forced to rely even more on foreign fuel supplies, and that can only weaken our nation’s economy and national security.”
The study examines the potential costs of the EPA’s “Tier 3” fuel standard for gasoline blends, which could be proposed at the end of the year. It determined that the new requirements could boost the cost of making gasoline by up to 25 cents per gallon and could shutter up to seven US refineries. The study also predicted this scenario could drive up CO2 emissions by up to 7.4 million tpy because of the increased energy needed to manufacture the new fuel blend.
“These regulations don’t make sense environmentally or economically,” said National Petrochemical and Refiners Association President Charles Drevna. “The proposal would increase greenhouse gas emissions, hurt American consumers by adding billions of dollars to the cost of manufacturing gasoline, hurt communities and workers by threatening to put some fuel manufacturing plants out of business, and weaken America’s economic and national security.”