It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Your Original Post did not distinguish between Operative and Speculative as you were unaware of the difference. You wrongly assumed the rituals of one belonged to the other.
Originally posted by LUXUS
"Ritual" wasn't on my mind at any point but "teachings" was.
It is true that I was not aware that you have changed your history so that you now only trace your history back to Solomon temple...
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
The was no history to change, it was a creation of the late 1600/early 1700's, and is purely allegorical and apocryphal in nature.
Originally posted by LUXUS
That is your opinion, you chose to believe it is fable, I chose to believe it is history...
...do you also believe that freemasonry was not in existence at the building of Solomons temple?
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by LUXUS
There are many manuscripts that claim all sorts of things about Masonry, but that doesn't mean they are used or were ever used. That is my point. The use of Nimrod is not nor was ever used in any ritual of Freemasonry. It's not like I haven't done the research.edit on 26-2-2012 by KSigMason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by LUXUS
Quit pulling at straws.
Please learn to write better.edit on 26-2-2012 by KSigMason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LUXUS
Basically your not even real freemasons anyway, you have zero knowledge of the ancient teachings. Now go play dress up with your friends
Originally posted by Hipgnosis
Just a quick shout out to my friends here: in a former life I was known as Masonic Light.