It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by eNumbra
It might be a 'policy violation' in your department. Cop much?
You were sure that she slipped her arms to the front.... Instead of the cop cuffing her in front. Now it would be a problem restraining her properly...... So she gets away from the fat bumbling idiot.
Originally posted by eNumbra
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by eNumbra
Then the fat and stupid cop gets her out of the car and fails to notice that she is cuffed in front? Takes her into the station that way? Doesn't notice?
Okay.
What do you expect him to do? Uncuff her then recuff her? That would be even more of a policy violation then simply cuffing her in front, and would give her an even better opportunity to escape.edit on 2/21/2012 by eNumbra because: (no reason given)
She escaped from inside the station.
In the station, sure where there are other cops around. By himself outside, not as likely.
Originally posted by Gawdlike
reply to post by eNumbra
Escape?? after her face smashed the concrete ?? and she is still not able to think rite or move rite you think she could have escaped ?? Now if your talking about before she smashed her head then I take back what i'm saying.. but if not then that's just dumb to even argue that in this situation..
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by eNumbra
She escaped from inside the station.
He screwed the pooch.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by eNumbra
All of this could have been avoided with one variable, if the cop was better prepared for his jobs.
reply to post by eNumbra
One of us is basing our argument on the information we have on hand, the other is making biased assumptions based on prior opinions of police officers.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by eNumbra
One of us is basing our argument on the information we have on hand, the other is making biased assumptions based on prior opinions of police officers.
Yes, I will admit that I know a lot of cops personally.
That would make my learned opinion biased.
Originally posted by kallisti36
Of course the force was excessive and this cop should be on probation at the very least for being too lazy to chase her. What I'm confused about is that the quote says she's in a vegetative state, but she gets up crying right after hitting her head. She doesn't seem to be a vegetable getting up, which leads me to two conclusions: 1. either this source is misrepresenting what happened, or 2. The cop didn't get her medical attention right away and her brain swelled up.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Malcher
Person? The hit and run could have involved a mailbox.
Also.. you would have to take a massive amount of coc aine for a long period of time to hallucinate.
Lovely, but I still would like to know what you expected him to do between the car and the station when he realized her cuffs had changed positions.
I don't think you're missing a thing. A lot of cop bashing here on ATS. Like I said in a previous post, "They’re all azzholes until you need one to assist you when someone if breaking into your home while the wife and kids are sleeping".
Originally posted by Ahabstar
Maybe I watched the wrong video, but I see an officer giving chase while firing the tazer. I see her fall, sit up and hear her ordered to lay back down.
I also see other officers walk up to them. Looks to me like she was fleeing a house (or maybe even the police station itself)? As it appears she came out of a building and there is a parking lot.
Sad if she is hurt, but I don't see a brain dead woman here. Just one that sat up and was able to receive orders to lay back down. Both of which require conscious thought and actions.
Or am I missing something here?