It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gwampo
reply to post by smithjustinb
so what's a black hole?
Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
reply to post by smithjustinb
Your logic is flawed..
Or have you seen anyone floating around at night, ever ?
Originally posted by metalshredmetal
i think your theory can be resolved when you realize that all matter is densely cohered light.
Originally posted by sy.gunson
That then raises the next interesting point which is if gravity is an effect depending upon light then how come black holes have massive gravity holes. That would contradict the theory. I am interested to hear some theretical answers....
Originally posted by Gwampo
reply to post by smithjustinb
so what's a black hole?
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
At first I thought: "Light has no impulse, as its mass is zero."
But then I thought about Radiation Pressure, resulting from E = h*ν, with m = h*ν / c^2 as an equivalent to "real" mass. It is absolutely tiny, but detectable.
But nethertheless, light does not create gravity.
Molecules "catching" photons, having them orbiting the nucleus? Nope.
Even if that would be true, there is no mechanism to emitt them only in one or two directions, so you would get an indifferent emission with a sum of zero in its vectors,
Originally posted by mileysubet
So how do you explain the moons effect on gravity, it receives aprox the same amount of light but has just 1/6 the gravity of earth?