It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nightbringr
Except of course remote viewing is a hoax.
Remote viewing/astral projection is one of the easiest things to test for. Simply lock a random object in a safe miles away, and have your "viewer" name the item. Of course, this fails time and time again.
Nothing to see here.
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by Darkblade71
Still, which is it? Nuclear war or meteor impact? What do you think?
if by your question do you mean the end of Mankind?
My humble opinion is that Man did not create his own existance. So I dont think it is possible that Man is able to kill off his own species especially with a Nuclear device.
Watch this Video and imagine the electrical storms (Lightning) is a Nuke detonating. Our Planet is so big and the will of man to survive is so strong. Actually one of our few animal instincts. The will to live. All just my opinion.
Originally posted by Imtor
To tell you, idk where you get this info from but if something is to happen big time - solar flare, tectonics, it is definitely not going to be a meteor, asteroid or any object of that kind.
In order to affect the climate and cause earthquakes, an incoming object has to be at least 500 km diameter, so far 5 meter or 2 meter objects would do one big nothing/ No incoming objects of that kind are observed.
Your 'catastrophic' is over-sensational
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
Interesting. Of course, this is one of those topics that will certainly bring out the naysayers...
I'm not going to lose sleep over this story, but the conspiracy theorist in me is fascinated by the idea that people might really be able to remotely view the future.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
So why would trust a remote viewer any real tests they have been given dont look good for their so called ability.
Originally posted by TheExopolitician
Originally posted by wmd_2008
So why would trust a remote viewer any real tests they have been given dont look good for their so called ability.
In this thread, which is representative of the uninformed societies as a whole, there exists an inordinate amount of disinformation, out-and-out lies and infantile foolishness regarding (remote) viewing. Having trained as a viewer utilizing strict scientific methodology of viewing, I will simply sum by saying that viewing can be highly accurate and rigidly controlled.