It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013

page: 49
56
<< 46  47  48    50  51  52 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2012 @ 11:39 PM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 



an even greater chance of an event such as the OP suggests!

Look up the meaning of fireball and see why it applies to the post I responded to and why you are wrong.


you sure you want to bring this topic up with anybody on the 2012 Thread Topic....um post history tells the tails

see ya,

oh yeah, thanks for the page count

Simply more worthless and off topic commentary.

Be sure to learn the meaning of fireball. And while you are at it learn why meteors do not impact.



posted on Jul, 18 2012 @ 11:54 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist



And while you are at it learn why meteors do not impact.

 


they dont? whats this?

Plenty in Russia, plenty of holes in Georgia and the Carolina's.

guess you know something the rest of the world doesn't

please share, do tell



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


Obviously you did not look up the meaning of meteor. It is a flash of light in the sky.

You really need to look up the terms. Meteors do not impact. The impact is from a meteorite.

You might want to look up other terms that I have pointed out you are misusing.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 07:09 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


no I dont. your pricking on semantics learned in grade school
and you are trying your best to shut down the thread,

move out stereologist

see ya,
edit on 19-7-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 11:52 PM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


It is not semantics. It is using English clearly.

I repeat meteors do not impact.

Your request for censorship is denied.

The claims of RV in general are worthless. No one has made any effort to substantiate the claims.



posted on Jul, 19 2012 @ 11:53 PM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


ok, what ever you say, its my day off


word!!!

all about the last word, no?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


What does any of this whining and misuse of English have to do with the pathetic claims of the RV crowd?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by stereologist
 


ok, what ever you say, its my day off


word!!!

all about the last word, stereologist, no?


Apparently.

www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by PeaNice
 


you dont use the PeaNice profile much do ya Ex?

you gotta break in that profile, like you break in a new member



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 07:15 AM
link   
Here is some quick info I found on Ed Dames
Ed Dames
ATS 04
ATS #2
ATS 3

I look for some more info on him later



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 07:23 AM
link   
reply to post by nancyliedersdeaddog
 


It has been well established in this thread that Ed Dames is an utter failure.

Would you like to add more failures for Dames from the threads you linked to?



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by nancyliedersdeaddog
 


It has been well established in this thread that Ed Dames is an utter failure.

Would you like to add more failures for Dames from the threads you linked to?

Haha I'm fine but It doesn't seem everyone on here feels the same way you and I do about him.



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 04:48 PM
link   
reply to post by nancyliedersdeaddog
 


There are those that look at complete failures of Dames and claim it is a win or not yet a failure.

Interesting how people do that.



posted on Aug, 8 2012 @ 02:14 PM
link   
From the research I have done, remote viewing seems to be an accurate science with empirical evidence to back it up (and even theory involving how time works)... this is an interesting article, I'm surprised I didn't know about it until now. I would suggest reading it to learn more about remote viewing.

If this event does happen, then it should be proof of remote viewing... and if it doesn't, it could be an example of remote viewing failing. But why does all of this kind of stuff just happen to land in 2012??



posted on Aug, 8 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   
reply to post by darkbake
 


I hear what you're sayin. RV went from military to civilian back in 1989. There are aspects to it that involve quantum mechanics and the universe is a hologram theory that I have in the past flat out rejected. I don't have the answers and frankly am fairly agnostic to this. Here is what seems to be a major connection. The future is a story written but depends on the actions of the present. I think that's the best way to explain it coming from me. Some are noted on this thread to say Malarkey and pure Crap and I respect that.

There "is" and there "is" what is going to happen. I mark what "is" by elapse time. Everything related to me involves the clock ticking. Look at it like this. Some people see ghosts. I cant. Are they real? I say no ,BUT. Some see UFO's. I call B.S. because I have never seen one. Are they real? I say no. BUT.

WHAT IF?????
edit on 8-8-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 8 2012 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Personally, I find it to be a waste of energy to debate whether the psychic phenomenon is real. I’ve had psychic experiences throughout my life. Normally it’s been all small, innocent kind of stuff like seeing baseball plays happen before they happen or “seeing” certain numbers someone has in mind. I’ve never trained myself to use this ability, but I know it’s real and I believe that certain individuals with this ability could be trained to use it to see into the future on command.

But I believe we have come to a certain time on our planet when a significant change is about to occur. Courtney Brown and his fellow remote viewers shouldn’t be looked at as the sole predictor of this upcoming event, but rather as one dot that can be connected with many independent dots to form a picture of our near future.

www.youtube.com...

I know there are many here on ATS who might think Clif High and his Web Bot Project can’t be taken seriously. However, he has independently reached the same conclusion about this upcoming event as Courtney Brown by using a completely different methodology. To me, this a another dot that we must consider.

en.wikipedia.org...

www.youtube.com...

Finally, the greatest asset the internet has is its ability to allow individuals from all across the globe to share with each other, independently, any psychic experience they may have had regarding this upcoming event.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Many ATS members have become jaded with regard to threads like the ones above, but I believe right now they are making a mistake. It’s my personal belief that these threads and many other recent ones like them are telling us the mass consciousness of humanity is sensing the same upcoming event as Courtney Brown and his remote viewers and Clif High and his Web Bot Project, thereby creating many more individual dots making this near future picture even clearer.

I believe we are now experiencing and witnessing a truly remarkable time in the history of mankind and we would be wise to step back and look at the bigger picture that is being created right in front of us.



edit on 8-8-2012 by 1questioner because: Adding a link



posted on Aug, 8 2012 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by darkbake
 



From the research I have done, remote viewing seems to be an accurate science with empirical evidence to back it up (and even theory involving how time works)... this is an interesting article, I'm surprised I didn't know about it until now. I would suggest reading it to learn more about remote viewing.

If this event does happen, then it should be proof of remote viewing... and if it doesn't, it could be an example of remote viewing failing. But why does all of this kind of stuff just happen to land in 2012??

RV is accurate science? I don't believe that. On the other I'd love to see what you have that shows it to be accurate or science or both.



posted on Aug, 9 2012 @ 01:25 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


Thanks, I will try to provide that information soon... I was thinking this was an accurate prediction, but the one hole in it is whether or not the prediction itself is a hoax...



posted on Aug, 9 2012 @ 01:51 AM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


Thanks for the heads up bro.

Do me a favor and ask them when something useful will happen. A meteor strike isn't really useful since we'll all mostly be dead anyway.

Thanks anyway. I'll prepare self to not give a damn.



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 10:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by darkbake
reply to post by stereologist
 


Thanks, I will try to provide that information soon... I was thinking this was an accurate prediction...

Remote viewing does not predict regardless of the incorrectly stated subject of this thread.



new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 46  47  48    50  51  52 >>

log in

join