posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:19 AM
wow, its funny how some people try to debunk this, with such terrible methods.
Some focus on the 7+ magnitude...when that's not what you should be looking at to debunk it.
It's the magnitude of the Earthquake when it's on the "near" side. When Earth would be between some object and the sun.
And both times we've been in that position, there's been a large Earthquake. Of course the earthquake will be smaller when Earth is on the other
side of the sun. That's why you only look at the big ones.
If it's right, and there is a large object incoming, then this pattern wouldn't extend into the past that far....the force of gravity increases
exponentially. You'd only see the pattern for a year or two, before *smack*. So looking at dates in the past is pointless.
The better method of debunking it would be to see what direction it's heading from, and actually go outside and look there, because there is
definitely a pattern there, trying to deny the pattern exists is kind of dumb....
The past two threads I've authored are about how something major is going to happen in March(the only detail I gave was "some will call it natural,
but it's not", and the thread after that is about how the sky(some of the stars specifically) isn't normal, and people need to look at it.