How green zealots are destroying the planet!

How green zealots are destroying the planet!

www.dailymail.co.uk

How green zealots are destroying the planet: The provocative claim from a writer vilified for denying global warming
By JAMES DELINGPOLE
Last updated at 2:23 AM on 4th February 2012
Comments (180)
Share

Just imagine a world where you never had to worry about global warming, where the ice caps, the ‘drowning’ Maldives and the polar bears were all doing just fine.
Imagine a world where CO2 was our friend, fossil fuels were a miracle we should cherish, and economic growth made the planet cleaner, healthier, happier and with more open spaces.
Actually, there’s no need to imagine:

(visit the link for the full news article)

Telling it like it is!
Time to get rid of the watermelon people.
Green on the outside, red on the inside!


Climate skeptics, or at least those challenging the rate of which humans contribute to climate change are owed an apology.

Will you zealots now apologize?
I am doubtful.

Read this great article to find out more about manipulation of the global climate change.

www.dailymail.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

all this is, is another side throwing a punch at the other with some more random points that nobody really knows anything about in real detail...

neither side really knows whats going on.

we are on a rock floating in space, and someone says its hot, and someone says it isn't.

its like a bunch of annoying family members fighting over the A/C temp.

i say, the green boys and girls should keep using more natural ingredients in their chocolate pudding because i love healthy pudding.

the people that say its fine and that global warming is fake, should then proceed to be quite and ignore them.

why do we have to fight? just stop it.

I'm aware of the UN/think tanks' population reduction agenda.

We're basically looking at a psychopaths' royal rumble, here. In one corner, we have the psychopaths who are pushing for using the environment as a means of controlling people, and an excuse for said population reduction.

In the other, we have the psychopaths who want free rein to turn the entire planet into a coal fracked, oil slicked, burnt out cinder, with an atmosphere of pure methane; all in the name of profit.

reply to post by petrus4


who put these horrible people in charge, i certainly didn't

its like i was born and *poof* here i am in this messed up world.

lol yeah green zealots are really ruining the world. Gulf oil spill...Fukishima, Nigeria oil leak, ETC ETC

Originally posted by minor007
lol yeah green zealots are really ruining the world. Gulf oil spill...Fukishima, Nigeria oil leak, ETC ETC

READ THE ARTICLE. SERIOUSLY

reply to post by BBalazs


I think you need to learn to research better

I was only just saying the same thing the other day in my thread 'Hippy Do-Gooders Have Destroyed The World'.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
We agree on this one

reply to post by minor007


The article has NO BEARING On the subjects you mention.
You throwing it in, is PROPAGANDA.
It is a about global warming, so you need to learn to READ better.

reply to post by BBalazs

TextWill you zealots now apologize?

Ha! They should.

Originally posted by BBalazs

Originally posted by minor007
lol yeah green zealots are really ruining the world. Gulf oil spill...Fukishima, Nigeria oil leak, ETC ETC

READ THE ARTICLE. SERIOUSLY

It's an article from the Daily Mail. I wouldn't believe that paper if it said that water was wet.

reply to post by AngryCymraeg


Sigh.
It an article, a viewpoint, by a skeptic, written by himself.
What is there not to trust?
You can argue the points made, but not reading it.
Oh well.
Sigh.

reply to post by BBalazs


The article you posted is already covered here
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And clearly it has been debunked. AS i said you need to research bettter

reply to post by minor007


it not debunked.
what part of it is debunked?
thats a small part of MY ARTICLE:
READ!


BTW: NASA SAID THE SAME THING AS THE MET OFFICE.
ALSO debunked?
well yeah, if you accept no SOURCES, everything is DEBUNKED.
WHAT ARE THE ACCEPTABLE SOURCES DEAR GOD OF ALL KNOWING?
Please provide a CENSORSHIP LIST FOR ME.
Commie.


Sigh.
Still not reading.
Sigh.
Still not using your brain.
Accepting forgone conclusions is exactly what makes a zealot.
Sigh.

Originally posted by BBalazs
reply to post by AngryCymraeg

 

Sigh.
It an article, a viewpoint, by a skeptic, written by himself.
What is there not to trust?
You can argue the points made, but not reading it.
Oh well.
Sigh.

A) Delingpole's just written a book about this. He's blowing his own horn.
B) He claims that we've seen no global warming since 1997. This is laughably incorrect - www.nasa.gov...
C) He complains that people are being nasty about him. Boo hoo, but I fail to to see the relevance.
D) He claims that 'Climategate' was a turning point. It wasn't.
E) He claims that ebil sooper seekrit scientists are really commie traitors and mentions a book that was published in 1968. I fail to see the relevance.

In summary, it's a standard Daily Mail knee-jerk right-wing whinging piece of drivel. 1/10 from me.

reply to post by BBalazs

read this link

Read this link here

as i said research better so that you dont look like an idiot...

reply to post by minor007


yeah, what exactly is your point?
it seems to strengthen the argument of the writer.
sigh.
still not read it, have you.
sigh.

reply to post by AngryCymraeg


its all true.
no one is denying climate change.
duh.
it happens.
read the article.
and read this thread, even nasa is tiptoeing away from climate change being the SOLE effect of humans:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by BBalazs


Excuse me i am a bit confused is English your 1st language or last?

4 January 2012 - 2012 is expected to be around 0.48 °C warmer than the long-term (1961-1990) global average of 14.0 °C, with a predicted likely range of between 0.34 °C and 0.62 °C, according to the Met Office annual global temperature forecast. The middle of this range would place 2012 within the top 10 warmest years in a series which goes back to 1850.

So where is this cooling period? Wait a minute you dont mean the la nina effect?