It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by areyouserious2010
Not just two people.. two cops. Trained for situations exactly like this. Knowing who was involved. Not a cartel member, terrorist, or serial killer, but an autistic kid.
Powell-Watts was screaming, livid, and inconsolable after her son was killed. She was furious that officers used deadly force against her son this time, rather than subduing him with a stun gun.
“They shot my son,” she yelled as officers as she was blocked from entering the Calumet City police station. “Every last one of you know my son has autism.”
Gilmore said police had been called to the home 10 times since 2010 to deal with the boy. Stephon’s father called police again Wednesday morning after the teen had become aggressive.
Calumet City Police Chief Edward Gilmore said the boy cut a police officer through his shirt sleeve with a “kitchen knife.”
“I think they did everything they possibly could to avoid this,” Gilmore said. “It’s unfortunate that we had to get to this situation.”
Watts’ mother Danelene Powell-Watts told myfoxchicago.com that police had tased him in past altercations.
‘They murdered my son, shot him twice in the head and decided to kill him,’ Mrs Powell-Watts told the station.
Gilmore said a year ago, all of the officers in the department went through a three-day autism awareness program to learn how to handle calls involving people with autism.
Trigger happy is a term normally used when an excessive amount of ammunition is used or when a shot is fired too hastily.
It seems in this situation, "trigger happy" would not accurately describe the actions of the police.
The officers only fired one shot each, totaling two shots. Two shots is no where near excessive under the circumstances. If the officers fired a total of 24 rounds, then yes, but two shots? No.
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by olliemc84
I have a 15 year old autistic son, this could have been my child.......I am stunned and heart broken
by this story.
I understand you have a 5 year old son? It is easy to say your son wouldn't do this or blame the parents as irresponsible, until you find yourself in their shoes. Dealing with a 5 year old autistic boy, your methods
would work. However, at 15, there is quite a difference.
I've. got. 10 years on you and a 15 yr. old teen is a whole new ballgame. You have the disability plus hormones, plus puberty, plus peer pressure, plus an inability to understand and regulate emotion, equals a time bomb.
Never say never! I used to make that mistake often. Do not be so quick to judge the parents.
No, the police are to blame no one else!! They were ill equipped to handle the situatuon! There should be a full investigation and they should be brought up on charges.
This kid was terrified and should in no way be held responsible for what happened.
Paxedit on 2/3/2012 by paxnatus because: (no reason given)
“They didn’t have to shoot him. They could have tasered the child. He’s only 15 years old,” Wayne Watts said. “They could have tased him, like they did him before, took him to the hospital and he would have been fine and that’s what I want to know. Why couldn’t they do that to him so that he could still be breathing with us right now?”
Originally posted by olliemc84
CBS Chicago Story
Really?? Everything they could? What about a taser, pepper spray, or a baton? Instead of shooting him in the head.
Gilmore said a year ago, all of the officers in the department went through a three-day autism awareness program to learn how to handle calls involving people with autism.
Well that program seemed to work....
Not just two people.. two cops.
Trained for situations exactly like this.
Knowing who was involved.
Not a cartel member, terrorist, or serial killer, but an autistic kid.
I know all about the 21 foot rule.
People tried to use the same poor argument when the cop murdered the wood carver.
I do know what I am talking about, what I know and what you think I know are two completely different things.
Why call the police in to deal with a kid with autism? I don't get it. Why didn't they call a specialist/doctor?
Well why would the officers need to fire 24 rounds when two rounds to the head is sufficient? They were trigger happy when
a) they (the entire station, apparently) knew the situation they were walking into.
b) officers are trained in hand to hand combat and are trained with the use of a baton or pepper spray.
Originally posted by olliemc84
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
reply to post by olliemc84
Having said that, why would the father be fighting with his autistic child to the point where the boy had a knife in his hands? Having been around a 5 year old with autism and seeing the fits that he can go through, the best thing to do in that situation is to try to talk him down or isolate him in a room where you know that he cant hurt himself. For the father to be having an extended fight with his handicapped son to the point where the police have to be called is IMHO irresponsible.
you know there are lots of different types of Autism right?
each demanding their own approach.
a whole lot of things could've spraked this situation.
seen it happen quite a few times at my internship.
(i work with autistic (young) adults)
Yes, I do understand.
Maybe the parents of this kid are not responsible enough human beings to be taking care of a special needs child. For the police to have to be called 10 times is pretty ridiculous. Maybe this kid should have been taken from his parents and put in a safer environment where educated people could attempt to help him, not fight with him. Who knows? He may still be alive.
When you use the police at a parenting tool, something is wrong. Terribly wrong.
Originally posted by yourboycal2
reply to post by CaptainNemo
When two officers went downstairs, police say the boy lunged at the officers with a knife. The boy's father, who witnessed it, says it was only a butter knife.
we should define "lunged" , regardless if it was a butter knife or not . Butter knife still does damage.
Do you think the shooting was justifiable.? The police department had knowledge of the boys handicap, and previously have dealt with the same situation, using tasers to subdue him.
previous knowledge ! can't justify it then . it was murder . Excessive force . Im curious though at the lunged part still , how heat of the moment it really was , or there was plenty of room to pull something else off.
Yea no taser on the officer either , many fails resulting from bad prep , bad communication , bad trainiing , series of bad events
resulting in the death of someone , without knowing what really happened hard to call it murder. But def, wrong.
“The lead officer did not have a taser. As he came down the stairs he was immediately confronted by the offender , who slashed his arm.”
consistently going off his meds , abusing his parents , what a bad history!
whats the procedure of locking up tools , objects that a special needs child should be kept away from ?
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by olliemc84
I have a 15 year old autistic son, this could have been my child.......I am stunned and heart broken
by this story.
I understand you have a 5 year old son? It is easy to say your son wouldn't do this or blame the parents as irresponsible, until you find yourself in their shoes. Dealing with a 5 year old autistic boy, your methods
would work. However, at 15, there is quite a difference.
I've. got. 10 years on you and a 15 yr. old teen is a whole new ballgame. You have the disability plus hormones, plus puberty, plus peer pressure, plus an inability to understand and regulate emotion, equals a time bomb.
Never say never! I used to make that mistake often. Do not be so quick to judge the parents.
No, the police are to blame no one else!! They were ill equipped to handle the situatuon! There should be a full investigation and they should be brought up on charges.
This kid was terrified and should in no way be held responsible for what happened.
Paxedit on 2/3/2012 by paxnatus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by areyouserious2010
reply to post by paxnatus
Please do not let me disagreeing with you overshadow my empathy towards your situation.
The parents are to blame. Maybe not after the first time the police were called to help them get their child under control, no matter what the mental handicap, but after the 10th time the police had to respond to the house because the child was out of control, measures needed to be taken. The parents failed to take those measures.
These measures needed to be taken by the parents, way way way before it got to this point. The parents should have consulted a doctor, a social worker or a mental health worker way before the 10th time the police needed to be called. The child should have been placed or steps should have been taken to move the child into an environment where the explosive behavior can be controlled, the child can be subdued and the child does not have access to anything that can be used as a weapon.
We do. There is a WIDE network, but the problem is an autistic child a hot potato. Remember the game. One potato, two potato....No one wants to get caught holding the potato (taking care of the child or the situation). Parents are extremely overwhelmed. There used to be respite, where the parents can drop the child off for a couple of nights and get a break. States are cutting that. Social workers tell you to call the police. The police are ill-equipped to handle the situation at hand. You're told if they refuse their meds call the police with an ambulance and bring the child to the hospital to take them. They refuse to transport the child if the child refuses to go. But, if they don't take their meds, they become exceedingly out of control. If you take them to the ER to have them take their meds, the ER gets p*ssed at you for bringing the child in for a non-emergency. But this is what you are told to do! They have mobile crises you can call to help calm the child down, but they can't come out if the child is violent. For liability reasons. I have been in this state for going on 9 months and I STIIL can't find a facility willing to take my daughter on. As I said in an earlier post, most facilities are for boys only, or they don't take mental handicap or developmental disabilities, or they don't take kids out of control. But you NEED a facility to help get the child under control. You can't dope them till they're a zombie. What. What would you have us parents do? I'm not arguing with you, I'm just trying to let you know how it really works for us parents. You're told all this help is out there, yet no one wants to provide it. Where are the state funds going??? It's certainly not going to help these kids. It's not like we can just drop them at the nearest church doorstep and say, "You're on your own kid." Even with me in NC and my daughter in PA with her father, I feel a tremendous responsibility to her, to get her the help she needs. It just isn't there. Not for all of those children anyway.
Police are given basic training on how to deal with mentally handicapped or disturbed people. That is it. They are not doctors, psychologists or social workers. When a mentally handicapped individual threatens their life, the situation has to be handled accordingly.
I agree, they're not psychologists, doctors or social workers. But these providers tell us parents to call the police. They get mad if we bring them to the hospital. Because now they have to deal with it. And when you call the police and the police bring them in, you still get in trouble with the doctor. Even though you did EXACTLY what they told you do. My personal experience, some of these doctors don't care. They don't. My daughter was in the ER back in Oct. and the doctor was releasing her. He hadn't signed the papers yet, so she was still a patient. She got mad that they were releasing her. She thought she could live there. When these child are in their world and they have something set in their minds, there's no changing it. She started beating me, right in front of the doctor. After seeing her continually hit on me and having security pull her off, he DISCHARGED her and told me to take her to the parking lot. He said if she continued to beat on me, call 911 from the parking lot and have officers respond to the PARKING LOT OF THE HOSPITAL!! Once they responded have her brought back in and they'll readmit her! Well then why in God's name did you discharge her???!! THIS, this is what we parents deal with.edit on 4/28/2012 by happyhomemaker29 because: (no reason given)edit on 4/28/2012 by happyhomemaker29 because: (no reason given)