It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
yes,, but the people like electric universe, who are saying all these people with technology using all the things capitalism has brought them.... my argument it to the majority of people in the world how cannot find food for their stomachs they would take a crap on a 4g phone and the newer more expensive one that comes out next week..
...
Originally posted by thehoneycomb
en.wikipedia.org...
necrometrics.com...
Rummel blames Lenin for a lifetime total of 4,017,000 democides.
How can you spin this?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what are some reasons why you wouldn't want to see a change in consciousness and systems to promote quality life and work for all?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what are some reasons why you wouldn't want to see a change in consciousness and systems to promote quality life and work for all?
Because a little bit of inequality is a good "school of life". It promotes a little competitive creativity. A completely level playing field turns into...North Korea.
Originally posted by LifeSpeaker
Absence of political system means anarchy and the first thing that pops up into people's minds is 'chaos'! which I consider to be absurd because it is such a baseless opinion as we have yet to put this idea to test.
The concept of a resource based economy (or RBE for short) could be considered an Anarcho-Technocracy in which the most relevant practical knowledge required to run society are carried out by technicians. It would be an open-sourced society, meaning that anyone could contribute to any aspect of society they wanted, assuming they have the requisite knowledge or skill to do so.
Talking about being in control of your own destiny, are you sure you are in this system? You do not even have the liberty of pursuing an interest which does not involve some monetary gain. Your outlook is greatly influenced by the media (which represents the propaganda of the government and huge corporations). So the choice of free will right now is just a mere illusion.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
FORCING people to do anyone's will is wrong. No matter the excuse you want to make.
Originally posted by petrus4
I support feminism, to the extent of such being defined as women having the same right to vote, and the same educational and economic opportunities as men.
Who decides what the little bit of inequality is?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what are some reasons why you wouldn't want to see a change in consciousness and systems to promote quality life and work for all?
Because a little bit of inequality is a good "school of life". It promotes a little competitive creativity. A completely level playing field turns into...North Korea.
Originally posted by petrus4
When you've got psychopaths running things on a global level, yes. They are the primary issue, as I've said.
Originally posted by colin42
Who decides what the little bit of inequality is?
So a little bit of inequality within the sexes has served women well hasnt it.
You do not have to promote competition in the human species it is ingrained but for a game to be truley competitive there has to be a level playing ground and that is what builds the quality in the competition.
Creativity is ingrained and is nurtured by encouragement not oppression.
Inequality does in no way promote quality, life and certainly not work for all. It promotes envy and hatred and increasing inequality. The clue is in the word. INEQUALITY.
So you are saying that the corperations and multi nationals are actually communist companies persueing communist ideas. Please. The aim of these corperations is to dominate the market and take over or stifle the competion. To achieve a monopoly. You label it how you want but it does not in anyway validate your ideology.
there cannot be a free market in a monopoly (with 1 participant). that is the very definition of communism my friend.
No you answered it and answered it incorrectly as I pointed out.
one ring to rule them all.
Oh please who is the misguided idealist here. Your statement above is so disconnected from reality that the only answer is. Please wake up, your snoring.
in capitalism all market particapents are equal. they are unequal due to PEOPLES choices, not TOP DOWN COMMANDS, such as COLONISE, RAPE!
Originally posted by ImaFungi
what do you think the next 20 years are going to be like?, if you dont mind expending some of your creative mind energy on me..
and what exactly do you mean by the school of life stuff?
o you believe there is no way you could have ever been born to a poverished family?
i will posit an abstract theory,..., the actions of the modern man/women,,, the capitalist/baron/ruler/elite, the families of extreme wealth...... the playing out of history how they accumulated their private properties and stored horded energy credits and valuables and what not.... is much how life started on this planet.... and the starting gates of the different races of species,,, it is a race... last one standing.... from the end of time,, the pure breeds are just trying to wait out the rest of the population... because you actually view it as a deadly competition.... you feel you would have been a fool to submit to love, and compassion.. those things cant get you anything or any where... just an idea that poped up,,, when trying to decipher the truth, of just exactly what is going on in this world,, i am not bias to all possible possibilities, it is stranger then fiction... it is cynical,, but the truth may be cynical.