It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Matt93
The MSM plays into the notion that people's attention spans are quite short and they want to see sensational news.
Whatever boosts the ratings I guessedit on 2-2-2012 by Matt93 because: grammar and spelling
Originally posted by SoulVisions
Originally posted by Matt93
The MSM plays into the notion that people's attention spans are quite short and they want to see sensational news.
Whatever boosts the ratings I guessedit on 2-2-2012 by Matt93 because: grammar and spelling
Main-Stream Media? What about ATS posters? I quote, "Pacific Ocean May Be Lost!"
That would fit the definition of sensationalism nicely, no?
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
It's actually worse than your worker friend is making it out to be.
300 tons of nuclear waste were dumped into the pacific the first week of the disaster. Just imagine how much has been introduced to the ocean by this point.
Here, a thread about the water currents and what it means for the planet.
Btw, seals in Alaska already have radioactive poisoning.
Just wait, you haven't heard anything yet...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
reply to post by havok
Our society isn't "progressing," corporate giants hold us back because their right to make a profit outweighs our right to life. Don't agree? Try telling that to our miserable excuse of a government.
If we were truly progressing we wouldn't be relying on fossil fuels, let alone nuclear energy, but there is no money in cheap energy.
Originally posted by Observor
Frankly if it is as bad this implies or worse, what would the knowledge itself do to help other than create panic? How is the public becoming aware of the radiation poisoning help them avoid it? Those who are seriously interested in it have the resources to find out what is possibly happening. The rest are no better off for knowing about it. If they are actively suppressing the information, that is bad. But not actively spreading the information through constant media updates about it is not bad in itself.
There are other things where the knowledge may help people change things and they tend to concentrate on them.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Sounds like a good time to start investing in Geiger Counters so you can scan your king crab or shrimp entrees at your favorite seafood restaurants. Then again if youre detecting radiation on your food then youre already exposed and already screwed.
Originally posted by superman2012
WAIT JUST A MINUTE!!! My TV box hasn't said anything about Japan in months....isn't that over?
When are they going to tell the truth about the actual accident, then maybe they could start thinking of solutions.
Originally posted by KaiserSoze
Look at your map, there are still places in the UK they are not allowed to farm, wild boars too radioactive to eat in Germany, .