It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BobAthome
reply to post by tonycliffs
Confucious say Emporer who play with Fire,,
dont know cant think of anything, confuciousy,,,
Me.
Originally posted by Wildmanimal
reply to post by tonycliffs
I admire your research and interest in history. Yet it should be noted that Leif Erikson is not
celebrated either. These explorers happened to somehow fall through the cracks of history.
History is written by the victors.
Concerning China, have you brushed up on this lately?
en.wikipedia.org...
www.foreignaffairs.com...
The above link is old news, yet still pertinant. After all you are discussing Old History.
I can assure you that it is yet still relative.
online.wsj.com...
These facts appears to be "falling through the cracks" lately as well.
When a lesson in humility is overdue, it is often acknowledged from old friends
before it is recieved from new enemies.
S&F
Originally posted by Aliensun
How do you figure to justify your headline?
Did he even make it around to Europe by rounding the horn of Africa?
Did he sail east and almost get to the Americans from that direction?
Mighty ships and much baggage does not an explorer make.
The virtually independent voyages by Europeans were the ones with the guts (or visions of glory)
Originally posted by isyeye
I think that the Chinese may have been in the Americas thousands of years before Columbus.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
I'm still dumbfounded as to why Columbus gets any credit for the "discovery" of the New World.
Leif Ericson did it 492 years earlier.
[eta]
reply to post by Wildmanimal
Ahhh... I got side tracked watching PawnStars and you beat me to it.edit on 30-1-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
I read an article recenty that entertained the idea that the "american indians" (or first American tribals to be more specific) may have actually come via the Atlantic ocean instead of using the bering strait. The argument was based on the fact the ancient Stone Age arrowheads and spear tips matched closer to the design of European tools and weapons from that time, and not Asian. Also, the earliest settlements seem to have been on the East Coast instead of the west. Last week I saw a show on History, which was discussing this same theory.
edit on 31-1-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pikestaff
Columbus was a bit put out when one of the natives, asked him, in English, "can I have some beer?" British and other European fishermen had been sailing to the North American fishing grounds for year before Columbus, 'they' kept quiet about the good fishing, for obvious reasons.
Originally posted by cenpuppie
That's because the next Emperor after him recalled the entire fleet and saw it as a huge waste of money.
And be damn glad to, because that's right before Gangis Khan swept out of Mongolia. Coincidence? If that fleet hadn't been recalled then he would have access to the both North and South America and history would have been different.
Perhaps that Emperor knew of the coming storm who knows? I do know that man and his fam ruled over the largest Empire in the world, overshadowing the Greeks and Romans.
But then again.. the Divine Wind DID sink damn near their entire fleet when they tried to invade Japan so who knows. When you look at it, at lot of "natural" events influenced the course of human history. A mere coincidence that the entire Spanish fleet was sunk at sea by a hurricane when Spain had the mightiest fleet in the western hemisphere during the war of 1812.
History rocks
Originally posted by tonycliffs
Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
I read an article recenty that entertained the idea that the "american indians" (or first American tribals to be more specific) may have actually come via the Atlantic ocean instead of using the bering strait. The argument was based on the fact the ancient Stone Age arrowheads and spear tips matched closer to the design of European tools and weapons from that time, and not Asian. Also, the earliest settlements seem to have been on the East Coast instead of the west. Last week I saw a show on History, which was discussing this same theory.
edit on 31-1-2012 by FugitiveSoul because: (no reason given)
In the book '1491,' the author states evidence that by the time Columbus arrived in the New World, there were already Mayan and Aztex cities much larger than London or Paris, and that the early pioneers had come from many different directions, not just across the Bering Straits.
Thus we have the comparions of the Egyptian pyramids to the Mayan pyramids, etc.