It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by daskakik
Is the amount of sodium relative to the amount of calories similar to eating a pizza? Yes it is because there's a lot more calories in a pizza. But the crucial issue is that the fructose has a very non-linear effect for the amount of calories it has -- creating much more fat per calorie and also it is poison.
Wrong there are not that many more calories in pizza 210 for the info I posted. A coke has around 150 so 71% of the calories but 13.75% of the sodium.
Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to post by daskakik
The biggest danger is the monopolization that every soda drinker contributes to. A monopoly with the power to instigate health problems in this country (unabated), strong arm foreign governments and slash and burn rain forest.
Greedy corporations have manged to cheapen the world. They invest in our weaknesses.
In a study conducted by University of California researchers, 16 volunteers were given a strictly controlled diet including very high levels of fructose. Another group was given the same diet but with high levels of glucose (regular sugar) replacing the fructose. Over 10 weeks, the volunteers that were given fructose produced new fat cells around their heart, liver and other digestive organs. They also showed signs of food-processing abnormalities linked to diabetes and heart disease. The control group of volunteers on the same diet, but with glucose sugar replacing fructose, did not have these problems.
Originally posted by technologicalsingularity
reply to post by kn0wh0w
Answer= Depopulation aka U.N agenda 21
the easy way to figure out the correct diet, is observe the folk that repulse you, like chav's/scroats/benifit bloaters in the UK, watch what they eat, when they eat and how frequently, now do the reverse! Little tip, the common vile folk, drink vodka/disarno/jeagermister/etc + cola, they love spirits and of course the alcofat = cider(future alcoholics!) when i was growing up i was taught that spirits and cider were for homeless alcoholics, my parents were right!, they love energy drinks such as red bull/relentless and most of all, monster, they love cola, small snacks such as pasty's/hotdogs/burgers/crisps/donughts that they can eat whilst walking that are approx 120-200cal, they drink drinkable yogurts such as yog, yogurts such as muller, harribo sweets , cookies, tea or coffee with full fat milk + 2 sugars or worse, sweeteners.
between 700 - 1000 calories a day can be consumed by just drinking 10 -12 tea or coffee with milk and 2 sugars, with ketchup or mayo as added flavourings on food (excluding the calories of the food itself) i know this because it's my job to watch people, look around, observe, do reverse and save your own life, don't become a number in agenda 21.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
But the fructose is increased so that it is in the same ratio as natural cane sugar. If it is sweeter why would more be used? Doesn't make sense. There is no fiber in sugar. Not even organic sugar.
Some basic biochemistry will help you understand this. Regular cane sugar (sucrose) is made of two-sugar molecules bound tightly together -- glucose and fructose in equal amounts. The enzymes in your digestive tract must break down the sucrose into glucose and fructose, which are then absorbed into the body. HFCS also consists of glucose and fructose, not in a 50-50 ratio, but a 55-45 fructose to glucose ratio in an unbound form. Fructose is sweeter than glucose. And HFCS is cheaper than sugar because of the government farm bill corn subsidies. Products with HFCS are sweeter and cheaper than products made with cane sugar. This allowed for the average soda size to balloon from eight ounces to 20 ounces with little financial costs to manufacturers, but great human costs of increased obesity, diabetes and chronic disease. Now back to biochemistry. Since there is there is no chemical bond between them, no digestion is required, so they are more rapidly absorbed into your blood stream. Fructose goes right to the liver and triggers lipogenesis (the production of fats like triglycerides and cholesterol). This is why it is the major cause of liver damage in this country and causes a condition called "fatty liver," which affects 70 million people. The rapidly absorbed glucose triggers big spikes in insulin -- our body's major fat storage hormone. Both of these features of HFCS lead to increased metabolic disturbances that drive increases in appetite, weight gain, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, dementia and more. But there was one more thing I learned during lunch with Dr. Bruce Ames. Research done by his group at the Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute found that free fructose from HFCS requires more energy to be absorbed by the gut and soaks up two phosphorous molecules from ATP (our body's energy source). This depletes the energy fuel source or ATP in our gut required to maintain the integrity of our intestinal lining. Little "tight junctions" cement each intestinal cell together preventing food and bacteria from "leaking" across the intestinal membrane and triggering an immune reaction and body wide inflammation. High doses of free fructose have been proven to literally punch holes in the intestinal lining, allowing nasty byproducts of toxic gut bacteria and partially digested food proteins to enter your blood stream and trigger the inflammation that we know is at the root of obesity, diabetes, cancer, heart disease, dementia and accelerated aging. Naturally occurring fructose in fruit is part of a complex of nutrients and fiber that doesn't exhibit the same biological effects as the free high fructose doses found in "corn sugar.' The takeaway: Cane sugar and the industrially produced, euphemistically named "corn sugar" are not biochemically or physiologically the same.
Originally posted by CaptChaos
The point he was making is that they put salt in it to hide the horrendous amount of sugar, and to make you THIRSTIER. The carbonation hides it too. Ever drank a flat soda? Mmm, mmm.
The natural sodium content of water, however, varies from 0 to over 500 mg per liter (a liter is about one quart), averaging 17 mg per liter.
Hell, the straight up syrup they make it out of is classed as Hazardous. Ever seen a tanker truck full of Coke syrup? Warnings all over it.
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by CaptChaos
The point he was making is that they put salt in it to hide the horrendous amount of sugar, and to make you THIRSTIER. The carbonation hides it too. Ever drank a flat soda? Mmm, mmm.
Does that mean that I should believe the guy although he is either ignorant or lying. Does Gatorade make a person twice as thirsty since it has twice the sodium?
Hell, the straight up syrup they make it out of is classed as Hazardous. Ever seen a tanker truck full of Coke syrup? Warnings all over it.
Concentrated syrup has got a pH of
Since there is there is no chemical bond between them, no digestion is required, so they are more rapidly absorbed into your blood stream. Fructose goes right to the liver and triggers lipogenesis (the production of fats like triglycerides and cholesterol).
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
I'm reading it and have seen it posted many times before and it is wrong. I even showed you the math showing sodium content when compared with caloric content. I never agreed that a can of coke has the same amount as half slice of pizza I said half a slice of whole wheat bread. I then specifically said that a slice of Little Ceasers 12" pepperoni has 7.27 times the amount of sodium than a coke.
I posted information that shows that both sugar cane sugar and HFCS are just as bad.
The "0 - 500mg" was from the site I linked above. The point about the sodium in water is that it is there and doesn't make you thirstier which was the point made in the OP.
edit on 28-1-2012 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
A twelve pack would be about half a 12" pizza so it isn't like drinking pizza.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by fulllotusqigong
I posted information that shows that both sugar cane sugar and HFCS are just as bad.
edit on 28-1-2012 by daskakik because: (no reason given)
2. HFCS and cane sugar are NOT biochemically identical or processed the same way by the body.