It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
reply to post by absolutely
There's a large language barrier. Are you trying to say that since the notion of God is "out of reality" (trans: outside reality). So, in your mind, that this is where free expression derives itself? (in your words "free expressions cant but be through true existence")? Therefore "existence is forced negatively through infinite inferiority" this then meaning existence of free expression can't derive from something inferior like mundane terra, but instead must come from a greater source? Therefore "a fortiori," God must be greater than time?edit on 25-1-2012 by Xtraeme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xtraeme
reply to post by absolutely
I imagine when you use CQFD you mean, "ce qu'il fallait démontrer" (as in "which was to be demonstrated")? I'm going to take a guess and assume you're French. Try to understand that what you're writing doesn't parse in English. It would be like me trying to communicate with you in French by going to translate.google.com, typing in English sentences, and then pasting the French translation verbatim as a response. So, stringing together the components of what is intelligible. I take it rather you view the abstraction of God as absolute. Therefore incapable of change. (This is how I interpret, "if god exist then time life is his freedom entity so whatever move dont change its fact same constant ... no obviously free expressions are existing in truth realisations ways bc reality exist."). So therefore God can't be time. Since time is change. Am I warm?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by absolutely
I think i might understand what you were trying to express...
if we are ignorant, as a default setting of individual conscious beings....We have the opportunity to be able to grow and learn, build knowledge and evolve and make subjective beliefs of the objective reality, create our own path or groove, explore that individuality...
taken to the extreme; if immediately after you were born, god were to take your point of awareness and immerse it with all truth of the universe, every aspect of fact,every potential and every possibility, to fill you with complete understanding,, you would not be free in anyway, or you would not be able to be subjective...
you would be a slave of the absolute truth?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by absolutely
I think i might understand what you were trying to express...
if we are ignorant, as a default setting of individual conscious beings....We have the opportunity to be able to grow and learn, build knowledge and evolve and make subjective beliefs of the objective reality, create our own path or groove, explore that individuality...
taken to the extreme; if immediately after you were born, god were to take your point of awareness and immerse it with all truth of the universe, every aspect of fact,every potential and every possibility, to fill you with complete understanding,, you would not be free in anyway, or you would not be able to be subjective...
you would be a slave of the absolute truth?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Philodemus
WOW! Phil! First of all...I have admitted to everyone on this board that I have three Major Weaknesses...1. I can't spell worth a crap! LOL! 2. I can never remember where I placed my keys or sunglasess and 3. I have a MASSIVE EGO![qoute]
I mentioned it was my first post, yes? How, or more importantly WHY would I care to know, about your personality traits? I was unaware it was my job to research the history of those posting on my thread. I thought those coming would turn their brains on, ask appropriate questions on areas that are unclear (if needed) and then contribute in someway other then being immediately condescending to the author for reasons unrelated to the subject of said thread. Maybe next time you are "greeting" a new member, you could start with a list of your flaws and circumvent the problem altogether.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Philodemus
So here is how it all connects to your topic...Since Time is simply a mesurement of MOVEMENT of Particles over distance....and since distance in our Universal state is Relative as is Time...since all Objects of Mass will create a Gravity well no matter how big or small dependent upon the amount of Mass...as it pertains to your topic....Logic dictates if God is Time and Time is Relative then so must GOD be relative.
So if we are actually living in a Multiverse with Many Divergent Universal States as well as Many Universal States at an Infinite Level that have nothing to do with us....where Time there may not even exist as a law of Physics....then does that mean GOD does not exist where Time does not exist?
Wrong. That proves that you do not understand the intent of my post in the slightest. I AM NOT TRYING TO PROVE ANYTHING. I AM NOT TRYING TO PROVE GOD IS TIME.
I AM NOT TRYING TO PROVE GOD IS TIME.
The title of the thread is misleading to this idea, but that is what all writers do. They grab your attention with title but do not base it so far out of the ballpark that once you've read the article you feel ripped off. I was trying to make a correlation in the way man refers to both god/God and time in similar terms and in the way that man has come to worship time as though it were a god.
I was speaking analogically. It is a prose expression of a poetic idea I have mulled around for years. I did not feel as though it fit well enough under any of the other forum headings for, boiled down it is a philosophical concept. Why would I try to prove that time is literally god? Who would attempt such an asinine feat?
That's it. It's a pity I have to spell it out for such an obviously intelligent individual as yourself.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Philodemus
By the way...what I am talking about is not Physics 101. And although I bear you no ill will...and could have but did not pick appart many inaccuracies that you stated even though you pointed out my...well known to this Board...Bad Spelling Issue...I would like to give you a bit of advice....In one of my jobs...I deal with very dangerous people who i cannot trust and it is my job to make contact and protect my associates on my team. I have found that 100% of the time that hostilities break out is when there is a lack of communication or an assumption by one side or the other on what they believe the other side is doing. Don't let that happen here. I was trying to help not judge or make you look silly. Believe that. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Philodemus
Phil...I will try to take it easy on you! LOL! First of all...we are not living in a 4 dimentional Universe....current calculations put it either 10 or 11....probably more in my opinion...and I will prove this to you. Hopefully you will understand a bit of Physics.
There is more I could tell you about other infinite Universal conditions where we do not exist and have different physical laws altogether...but I think that will be a bit too much for now.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Time is mind and mind is not God.
God is timeless, eternal.
Mind and time is an appearance.
God is the seer and knower of all things, including time and mind.
Secondly, I would like to point out that I do not believe in a god as an actual being.