It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by YeshuaPiso
President of a sovereign nation that won't let international central bankers bury them under debt?
Accepting national sovereignty, in turn, demands accepting of the principle that power resides in the nation, which means the totality of individual citizens, irrespective of race, religion, belief, gender, occupation, etc. This equality of all citizens before the laws is a necessary condition for the removal of any legal basis for inequality and discrimination.
In the Islamic Republic system of Iran however, national sovereignty does not exist. Instead, "sovereignty and divine laws" reside uniquely in God. Depriving a nation of its rights to sovereignty and making it "godly" means withdrawing a nation its right to self-determination. In this case, the branches of government derive their power not from the people, but from God.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by YeshuaPiso
President of a sovereign nation that won't let international central bankers bury them under debt?
Accepting national sovereignty, in turn, demands accepting of the principle that power resides in the nation, which means the totality of individual citizens, irrespective of race, religion, belief, gender, occupation, etc. This equality of all citizens before the laws is a necessary condition for the removal of any legal basis for inequality and discrimination.
In the Islamic Republic system of Iran however, national sovereignty does not exist. Instead, "sovereignty and divine laws" reside uniquely in God. Depriving a nation of its rights to sovereignty and making it "godly" means withdrawing a nation its right to self-determination. In this case, the branches of government derive their power not from the people, but from God.
DEMOCRACY AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY IN ISLAMIC REPUBLIC
You are wrong sir.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Brasov
Its only irrelevant,when FACTS are brought up......
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4
Originally posted by Ben81
On the same day, the U.S. Coast Guard cutter Adak was also harassed by high-speed Iranian Navy boats while operating 75 miles east of Kuwait City. Iranian personnel in the small boats appeared to be holding AK-47 rifles and at least one video camera, the official said. U.S. personnel on the cutter also reported seeing a forward gun that was manned on one of the Iranian boats, according to the official. Eventually, communications with a larger Iranian vessel in the area were established and the speed boats stopped their harassment.
US Coast Guard
they must really be short of ships to use the coast guards
there is something wrong with the picture
it doesnt belong in the ME
What is the meaning of bringing them there .. ?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
It sounds like another gulf of tonkin playing out...........
Iran and syria has it coming because they have a big mouth towards america and israel and because they are dictators.
Originally posted by Brasov
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Brasov
Its only irrelevant,when FACTS are brought up......
Yeah we know about U.S. "facts", WMDs in Iraq and such... leading to the mass murder of 1,500,000 civilians since 2003.
Look, you better get used to the fact that the civilized world wants to get rid of your war mongering just as badly as it wanted to get rid of the nazi's, or probably a lot more.
The World might have no choice but to NUKE you, ever thought of that?edit on 13-1-2012 by Brasov because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Brasov
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by Brasov
Its only irrelevant,when FACTS are brought up......
Yeah we know about U.S. "facts", WMDs in Iraq and such... leading to the mass murder of 1,500,000 civilians since 2003.
Look, you better get used to the fact that the civilized world wants to get rid of your war mongering just as badly as it wanted to get rid of the nazi's, or probably a lot more.
The World might have no choice but to NUKE you, ever thought of that?edit on 13-1-2012 by Brasov because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Brasov
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
It sounds like another gulf of tonkin playing out...........
Iran and syria has it coming because they have a big mouth towards america and israel and because they are dictators.
What a crock... all counties are ruled by dictators, no one is better that the rest. Iranians vote just lile USAns do, only they get a lot more variety of choices. In the end, whatever peole vote, an unelected corporate/bankster governent controls the U.S.A. and a religous/patriotic clan controsl Iran. I side with the clan, it's more humane.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
You make it sound as though americans are in charge of america.
Iranian Navy speed boats harassed US naval vessels in two recent incidents in the Strait of Hormuz, a senior US defense official said, confirming a CNN report.
(...)
"I can confirm there was some harassment," a senior official told AFP.
(...)
Originally posted by woogleuk
This is a very serious threat that the US Navy faces, I shall attempt to show in this professionally drawn picture I have just knocked up whilst eating my dinner:
People just don't realise the dangers.edit on 13/1/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Equ1nox
Originally posted by inivux
It is not one sided. End of argument.
Originally posted by YeshuaPiso
Originally posted by inivux
reply to post by YeshuaPiso
I hate to break it to you, but it isn't one sided. Ahmadinejad wants nothing more than to watch the world burn.
Is the Western world openly vilifying Iran? Yes.
Is Iran fighting fire with fire? Yes.
I hate to break it to you but you know nothing about Ahmedinajad that you haven't been fed by the Western media.
wow what an amazing reply, with such an amazing argument i guess everyone will have to agree with you now. What if i say it is one sided, end of argument, what would be your amazing response to that?
If Iran wants nothing more than to watch the world burn how come they haven't invaded anyone for hundreds of years? How many countries have the US invaded in the last 10 years?edit on 13-1-2012 by Equ1nox because: (no reason given)
Last week's close encounter between U.S. ships and Iranian speed boats in the Strait of Hormuz was considered "routine" and a "very common occurence" especially for ships transiting the strait, a senior defense official and a U.S. military official tell NBC News.
The officials called the encounters "predictable behavior that has been going on for years."
U.S. Navy officials said the communications were "professional," and the U.S. ships were not forced to increase their security or threat levels.
U.S. officials denied a report that Iranian boats "harassed" the U.S. ships or displayed hostile intent.
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
Methinks that some sort of limpid type mine will soon be placed on the hull of one of the US ships, by the Mossad or CIA, and detonated to do some damage, but hopefully with no loss of life!
This will be the false flag event to justify taking military action against Iran.
Just throwing it out there...