It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeoVain
So you actually believe in the Reptilian theory then? You seem like an intelligent person considering your stargate thread, so that baffles me. But maybe you know something about this that i don´t. Could you please show me the best evidence for this that you have seen, because everything i have seen have been ridiculous, artifacts in low-res vids, news broadcasts that have been modified and where the viewer is "insinuated" to believe a camera artifact is signs of subject being a reptilian... Evidence like that is just too paranoid for me
The whole story of Christ is absurd from beginning to end, and anyone who thinks carefully about the Trinity and the Incarnation quickly finds these concepts to be incomprehensible. Is the Trinity even compatible with monotheism?
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by undo
I think this is less about being right and wrong, than it is about getting the bigger picture. The original Zeitgeist may not be correct on every single issue (although the updated version seems to be better), but the bigger picture painted if you truly understand it, is nowhere near false. And that is what is important. Nitpicking stuff in such works of art are really like not seeing the forest because of all the trees blocking it.
And i certainly do not mind your comments, i find this could get very interesting, if you truly desire to understand the bigger picture. Beware of the false clues, though, if you know what i mean.
The archaeological evidence of the largely indigenous origins of Israel is "overwhelming," and leaves "no room for an Exodus from Egypt or a 40-year pilgrimage through the Sinai wilderness
The tradition of Moses as a lawgiver and culture hero of the Israelites can be traced to 8th or 7th century BCE in the Kingdom of Judah. Moses is a central figure in the Deuteronomist account of the origins of the Israelites, cast in a literary style of elegant flashbacks told by Moses. The Deuteronomist relies on earlier material that may date to the United Monarchy, so that the biblical narrative would be based on traditions that can be traced to about four centuries after the supposed lifetime of Moses.
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by undo
I just see your opinions - would you like to point out your evidence because I might have overlooked it
The Book of Exodus of the Hebrew Bible was composed or redacted around the 6th century BC and was influenced by Neo-Assyrian legend. In particular, the image of Sargon as a castaway set adrift on a river resembles the better-known birth narrative of Moses. But the account of Exodus turns the theme on its head— rather than a royal fostered by commoners before rediscovering his royal blood, Moses is the son of slaves who is fostered by the daughter of Pharaoh.[40] Scholars such as Joseph Campbell and Otto Rank have also compared the 7th century BC Sargon account with the obscure births of other heroic figures from history and mythology, including Karna, Oedipus, Paris, Telephus, Semiramis, Perseus, Romulus, Gilgamesh, Cyrus, Jesus, and others.[41]
Furthermore, a number of 20th-century scholars have speculated that Sargon was an inspiration for the biblical Nimrod, mainly since both figures were credited with the construction of the cities Babylon and Akkad.[11]