It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SecretKnowledge
welcome to ATS. you do realise your gonna have to start a thread when you hit 20 posts about what you've seen/done etc. i mean, after this post of yours people are going to want to know what you've been up to.
this is the right place to share your knowledge you know
Yes but if you can control light, then you can control time in a sense. The two are intrinsincly linked. Check out relativity.
Originally posted by Equinox99
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
There is a problem with what these scientists are doing. Not that it could used for evil but how can you implement such technology and "wipe out a whole village" if the village is already known before the time hole is made? Are you going to walk around and men in black people's brains to forget about this so called village?
Or are they hinting that they will go back in time and erase this village before it was made? This would mean they created a time machine and not a time hole.
Making events disappear is impossible. You will have a better chance at traveling faster than the speed of light. Unless of course you create a time machine.
Just a thought.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by DarknessMatters
No.. look around wired obviously isn't the only source for it, they are just reporting it.
Why is it so hard for you to believe. It's not really that mind blowing when you read it.
Give it about 50 or a 100 years and what they have done with the tech.. that will be mind blowing.
Also, Wired never said Obama went to Mars.. duh. They reported the story of two supposed "time travelers" that were telling the story and how it was denied. www.wired.com...edit on 4-1-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by DarknessMatters
No.. look around wired obviously isn't the only source for it, they are just reporting it.
Why is it so hard for you to believe. It's not really that mind blowing when you read it.
Give it about 50 or a 100 years and what they have done with the tech.. that will be mind blowing.
Also, Wired never said Obama went to Mars.. duh. They reported the story of two supposed "time travelers" that were telling the story and how it was denied. www.wired.com...edit on 4-1-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
So present us with the source that wired,com used.
Also "a event" they could just as well be claiming that they hid the event of a neuron firing of.
Im doubtfull about the validity of the whole story.
edit on 5-1-2012 by Rafe_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
Originally posted by DarknessMatters
Originally posted by J.Son79
Every major news outlet is reporting this. Foxnews, etc.
Any News report I've seen on TV about it, mentioned Wired as the source. So, I rest my case.
How about Nature Magazine to sate those burning questions then.
Demonstration of temporal cloaking
Recent research has uncovered a remarkable ability to manipulate and control electromagnetic fields to produce effects such as perfect imaging and spatial cloaking1, 2. To achieve spatial cloaking, the index of refraction is manipulated to flow light from a probe around an object in such a way that a ‘hole’ in space is created, and the object remains hidden3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Alternatively, it may be desirable to cloak the occurrence of an event over a finite time period, and the idea of temporal cloaking has been proposed in which the dispersion of the material is manipulated in time, producing a ‘time hole’ in the probe beam to hide the occurrence of the event from the observer15. This approach is based on accelerating the front part of a probe light beam and slowing down its rear part to create a well controlled temporal gap—
If this little tidbit is just now released I bet dollars to donuts that they military is a little further ahead in this research than is admitted.