It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher
...If Bob had time enough to show it to George Knapp, ...
Gariac thinks anyone who was actually there or witnessed anything AT THE TIME is not important. However, a group of guys who are there viewing conventional craft in a desert years later are all experts. Go figure...
Originally posted by Dalbeck
Thanks for this interesting thread A51 Watcher
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by A51Watcher
...If Bob had time enough to show it to George Knapp, ...
Is it known what George Knapp had to say about the shown sample(s) of Element 115, Gariac?
Dad,
Originally posted by dadfortruth1
Originally posted by A51Watcher
Look, if I am the only guy on ATS and the internet that knows the answer to this 115 question...
WE ARE ALL IN DEEP #### !!!
Look I can and I will look it up on my own, but like I said before, I appreciate your knowledge on this subject (well I did) and would like to hear your take on it! is that too much to ask?
I'm now starting to think your dodging the question.
Originally posted by Pimander
(As for that Pimander character, don't know what he's on about though eh? )
How very dare you.
I think you know better.
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Again, the most stable isotope of Ununpentium 115 has a half life of milliseconds.
It is impossible for that part of Bob Lazar's story to be true.
We may not know about all isotopes yet. There is some interesting science in the creation of novel isotopes. In fact we may not have discovered them all for some of the elements we have known about for ages. Who knows what exotic matter is out there, science is a living growing thing and will have many surprises in store for us.
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Again, the most stable isotope of Ununpentium 115 has a half life of milliseconds.
It is impossible for that part of Bob Lazar's story to be true.
I haven't said what my final interpretation is. Some of it I'm still working on. It's like a dot to dot where the dots aren't joined yet. However, I have the advantage of a huge number of dots and can see lots of the picture.
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Pimander has definitely put the effort in to research and understand the issues under discussion.
I may disagree with his interpretation of the evidence but I try to always give his posts honest consideration.
Originally posted by MajesticTwelve
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Again, the most stable isotope of Ununpentium 115 has a half life of milliseconds.
It is impossible for that part of Bob Lazar's story to be true.
How would you know that when no one has made the most stable isotope?
Which should be Element 115 containing the magic number of 184 neutrons.edit on 2012/1/25 by MajesticTwelve because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
John, I was recently listening to an ATS mix show where you went into some detail about your first hand experience with element 115. You mentioned that you had done some quick experiments with it, and that it was on video. Can you point me to where I can take a gander?
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
My understanding is that the "island of stability" for super heavy elements is theoretical. If you have a definitive source beyond speculative science blogs and internet UFO fan boy nonsense I would be interested to see it.
Perhaps exotic isotopes also have implications for alternative propulsion...
Atomic nuclei are many-body systems built from two strongly-interacting Fermi liquids (protons and neutrons). Uniquely, these two components can be varied over wide ranges in modern experiments, thus creating exotic isotopes: nuclei with unprecedented proton/neutron ratios that are characterized by new modes of excitation and novel structures. Understanding exotic isotopes has implications for astrophysical processes and the physics of neutron stars.
www.surrey.ac.uk...
reply to post by Pimander
Gariac is claiming that 115 is the cornerstone of this debate but apparently doesn't know what happened to it. Do you see where that leaves this expert? He doesn't know who the witnesses were, how many there were, where the alleged 115 is, didn't know that the craft were filmed and never went to A51 when they were testing non-conventional craft. Do you think experts like that need exposing in the interests of denying ignorance or not? Hmmm?
Not if he was telling the truth and wanted to stay alive. You might be right but YOU DON'T KNOW FOR SURE. Being honest in research is VITAL. You can't do it - in fact I'm surprising myself bothering to respond to you any more. Own up to your failings. Everyone who knows me knows I will do that without hesitation. It is becoming increasingly clear that you won't. How sad!
Originally posted by gariac
If he had some element 115, he would have presented it to a lab. Hence the whole story is fabrication (fancy word for lie). Case closed, well expect for the church of Lazar fanbois.
New exotic isotopes are not new elements. You clearly don't understand the basics of what we are discussing. Go Google it then come back and pretend to be an expert if you like but don't expect an easy ride.
Uh, it is called working at the collider. You don't need grad students.There are ongoing projects at every collider to create new elements.
Why have you mentioned Dulce AGAIN when I have made it COMPLETELY CLEAR that I think it's garbage? Another pathetic attempt to distract from your dishonest contribution to this thread. Either that or trolling. The point is YOU DON'T KNOW STUFF that you were pretending to and haven't admitted it. Blind assertion is not research or cool.
Originally posted by gariac
Feel free to be the Bob Lazar expert or the Dulce expert for that matter. Both are clearly fiction. You can be the tooth fairy expert too. Just don't comment on anything that goes on around the Nellis range since your knowledge is lacking there.
Originally posted by Dalbeck
Thanks for this interesting thread A51 Watcher
Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
Originally posted by A51Watcher
(As for that Pimander character, don't know what he's on about though eh? )
Originally posted by Pimander
How very dare you.
I think you know better.
i]Originally posted by Drunkenparrot
I'll vouch for Pimander.
Although I disagree with some if his beliefs and conclusions, I respect his opinions and believe he is sincere.
Pimander has definitely put the effort in to research and understand the issues under discussion.
I may disagree with his interpretation of the evidence but I try to always give his posts honest consideration.
Originally posted by A51Watcher
Thanks for the vouch but really no need. I agree with your assessment of him and actually we get along famously.
That was just my way of kidding him and I assure you he knows it.