It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
If we don't believe yet in Christ, why would we fear in the Hell He created????
I'm sure you would like to quote a verse saying God (or Jesus, according to you) created Hell for people.edit on 1-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LaughingatHumanity
reply to post by jmdewey60
According the the gnostic gospels which were conveniently stricken from the good book during the council of Nicaea all souls within hell were released via christ and hell ceased to exist from that point.
Kind of hard to keep people obedient when your own scripture chased out the bogeymen, so they just left that part out.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
"Gird up your loins" is a safe, flowery way to say. "Stop crapping your pants."
In the same way when the Lord addressed King Cyrus He told him that he would "Loose the loins of kings".
Did you get this from one of your YouTube videos?
You could have a psychological need to feel you are right, like a survival instinct so that your kids trust you.
If I say that I am at peace and at rest then why would you want me to believe anything else. I have found the rest that Christ Promised. You are still searching all over the place and have no rest. This is why I pray for you.
OK, then back to your old tricks, then, ignoring what I just quoted and pretending you never said that, all the while creating a distraction from the actual topic because you are a compulsive poster and write things without even thinking about them.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
If we don't believe yet in Christ, why would we fear in the Hell He created????
I'm sure you would like to quote a verse saying God (or Jesus, according to you) created Hell for people.edit on 1-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Where did I say Hell was created for people in my post above that you quoted?
The Council of Nicea addressed the Arian heresy. Everyone voted against Arius and his heretical claims about Christ except two people. Also a date for Easter was decided upon. There is no record whatsoever that the books of the Bible were discussed at Nicea.
Originally posted by Frira
Jesus is God-- the second Person of the Holy Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit-- One God in three Persons.
I believe what you are noticing is the fairly recent emphasis-- particularly among fundamentalist evangelicals (fairly recent as a identifiable group of Christians)-- confessing Jesus as Lord and seeking to persuade others to do likewise. That emphasis ought not be to the exclusion of the confession of God the Holy Spirit and God the Father-- but it sure comes off that way.
Whether it is meant in such a way, it seems very much to have that American "individualism" as its tone in a sort of "It is all about Jesus and me-- and it can be about Jesus and you" leaving little, if any, room for an "us."
So if I understand this correctly, if one has God 100% in his life, his head, his heart, and his actions. Has freed himself from the bondage of self, lives a righteous life, is of services to others, carries the word of God not just in his own words, but mainly in his actions, and loves all through God.
I don't know that such is correct-- formulas such as those will vary from one person and another based upon wisdom, gifts, experiences and such.
And trying to define a formula for getting into Heaven may be problematic. To start with-- How would one have God 100% in his or her life? Playing Abraham, I tease by asking, "what if only 90%... how about 50%...?"
It is not "bondage to self," but "bondage to sin" which is most often considered. A somewhat high spirituality often attempts to minimize the ego so that true and spiritual self may emerge, but that is a whole different topic-- but a good one.
That when he get's upstairs and meets the Big Man, the Big Man is going to say, "you have lived a very good life, done well, but because you never called Christ your savior, Shepard, etc... I have to send you to hell..." then pulls the big lever and the trap door opens beneath him?
No. To the contrary.
Jesus told us that some who confess His Name will be told by him "Depart from me... I never knew you;" and to the great delight and surprise of others who have never heard of Jesus, He says, "Come! O blessed of my Father!"
Honestly, I am torn as to which is better. I believe I have a "personal relationship with Christ" but it is very difficult work-- more difficult than loving an enemy-- which anyone can do-- Christian or otherwise. To a large degree, it hurts. But the relationship is worthwhile. Even if I had a guarantee of salvation-- which I do not-- I would rather live a life in misery knowing Him than not.
Nor is it a good evangelical tool for North American ears to be told, "Blessed are the poor" or "Blessed are those who mourn" as it goes against the "American way." Certainly, "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God" will cause pews to empty in some churches-- or at least cause quite a bit of squirming.
I am not the product of a church which emphasizes public declarations as a form of evangelizing. There is a very private component which is emphasized-- "work, prayer, and study" come to mind as a "rule of life" I have followed.
My spiritual gifts may include being a good teacher; but they almost certainly do not include being an evangelist-- so you can see where my objection to that emphasis instead of one of teaching, may persuade me to oppose it as a "formula."
Originally posted by Awoken4Ever
God is the big picture, not Christ. Christ is secondary,
Originally posted by Awoken4Ever
"When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come."
Since people often find it easier to be a result of the past than a cause of the future.
Originally posted by Awoken4Ever
reply to post by FugitiveSoul
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. This is none of my business, and I respect you completely if you don't wish to answer because it really is none of my business, but I am wondering if you are a New Ager?
I only ask, because a lot of what you are saying sounds like that.