It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Undercover police officers routinely adopted a tactic of "promiscuity" with the blessing of senior commanders, according to a former agent who worked in a secretive unit of the Metropolitan police for four years.
The former undercover policeman claims that sexual relationships with activists were sanctioned for both men and women officers infiltrating anarchist, leftwing and environmental groups.
The one stipulation, according to the officer from the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS), a secret unit formed to prevent violent disorder on the streets of London, was that falling in love was considered highly unprofessional because it might compromise an investigation.
He said undercover officers, particularly those infiltrating environmental and leftwing groups, viewed having sex with a large number of partners "as part of the job".
"The best way of stopping any liaison getting too heavy was to shag somebody else. It's amazing how women don't like you going to bed with someone else," said the officer, whose undercover deployment infiltrating anti-racist groups lasted from 1993 to 1997. Two years later the SDS became the National Public Order Intelligence Unit, the secretive organisation that employed Kennedy and whose activities are the subject of three investigations.
Original News Article and Source
What say ATS about these despicable tactics?
Originally posted by hadriana
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I think it is state sponsored rape. It would leave an activist feeling deceived and violated. Rape by deception, if you will.
Originally posted by hadriana
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I think it is state sponsored rape. It would leave an activist feeling deceived and violated. Rape by deception, if you will.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
What say ATS about these despicable tactics?
That anyone who is surprised by them must be very naïve indeed. And that anyone who disapproves of them is being rather silly.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
dp
edit on 30-12-2011 by TsukiLunar because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by satron
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
dp
edit on 30-12-2011 by TsukiLunar because: (no reason given)
Are the undercovers down with that?
Originally posted by nh_ee
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
This is simply a carryover of modus operandi from the intelligence community.
Women operatives ala Mata Hari have long been used to infiltrate organizations.
Remember Monica Lewinsky ?
She was MOSSAD tasked with the blackmail of Clinton and more importantly to disrupt the Peace talks Bill Clinton was backing between Yassar Arafat & Israel by orchestrating the entire sex scandal leading to Clinton's impeachment.
from whatreallyhappened site....mossadbug....
Wont post the link due to new censorship measures implemented here ...
Peace
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by hadriana
I see you are one of those people whose definition of rape is elastic enough to mean whatever you want it to mean.
Rape is forced sexual intercourse. Which would be unlikely to yield anything much in the way of intelligence.
What we are talking about here is consensual sex. Deception is a part of every sexual relationship.